{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"running","residency_state":"resident"}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as end-to-end execution of Todo11’s r71 observer rebinding and two-stage runtime proof - I’ll inspect the exact plan and receipts, establish red tests, make only the authorized observer/service changes, then capture the manual and natural-timer hash-chain evidence."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The plan confirms the scope is surgical: the production generation remains committed original r71, while the observer alone moves from the immutable r70 chain to a fresh r71 chain. I’m now establishing the exact authority/runtime bindings, prior observer fix, and pre-mutation service/file baseline before writing the two failing tests."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The red phase is specific: the new exact-binding test fails on the old 81a7a06e/r70 tuple, while the previously failing configured-authority regression remains green. I’m applying only the generation bindings and unit/checksum changes; the seven-day cadence, evaluation, append, and finalization logic remain untouched."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"edit","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"The first and only manual service start exposed a real current-authority gap: all r71 runtime checks passed, but the newly configured a41c authority root contains no inherited 2026-08-31 day-status row, so the fresh chain correctly appended FAIL rather than a false PASS. I’m tracing the sealed authority lineage now; I will not delete the failed row, replay the manual start, trigger the timer, or fabricate a PASS."}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"read","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":true}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"write","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"lsp_diagnostics","is_error":false}}
{"type":"tool_execution","payload":{"tool":"bash","is_error":false}}
{"type":"assistant_message","payload":{"text":"I read this as Todo11 end-to-end execution - I executed it fail-closed and recorded the truthful blocker.\n\n**Result: no DoneClaim.**\n\nEvidence:\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/nutricoach-telegram-checkin-stepper/task-11-observer-r71.json`  \nSHA-256: `64b3eeee5d3b1621b7cd5e258c1a2c8fcf28274b0d8aca41c0e459635e085f85`\n\nFindings:\n- r71 bindings, service runtime, writable path, and checksum manifest were updated.\n- Observer tests: `9 passed`; Ruff, basedpyright, ty, compile, and LSP passed.\n- The sole manual run truthfully produced `FAIL:first_day_status`.\n- The next natural timer run also produced `FAIL:first_day_status`, correctly hash-linked to the manual row.\n- Root cause: current r71 authority `weekly-operations-authority-a41c97c8a467b030` has zero day-status rows; the required 2026-08-31 status exists only in predecessor r70 authority.\n- I did not delete/rewrite the failed chain or manufacture PASS.\n- Timer remains active/waiting; gateway PID `3376522` and `NRestarts=0` remained stable.\n- r70 observer and protected customer/delivery hashes remained unchanged; no customer/provider/network, cron-manual, gateway-restart, r71b, or Git actions occurred.\n- Subscriptions, temporary files, and debug journal were cleaned.\n\nArchitectural review: responsibilities and typed boundaries remain intact; no variant, escape-hatch, defensive-layer, parameter-bloat, logging, or one-off-helper issues were introduced. Runtime remains in the 245-LOC warning band."}}
{"type":"transition_applied","payload":{"type":"transition_applied","status":"completed","residency_state":"resident"}}