{"task_id":"st_019fd721","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd4c6-0643-7514-a41b-c7184413a453","root_session_id":"019fd4c6-0643-7514-a41b-c7184413a453","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-06T12:51:35.314Z","updated_at":"2026-08-06T13:00:35.253Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-goal-audit","task_summary":"Audit achieved live goals and evidence gaps","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Audit whether the DualCoach live QA actually achieved its user-visible goals and identify evidence gaps. This is an executable read-only review, not a context handoff. DELIVERABLE: PASS/FAIL verdict per onboarding, trainer review, owner review, activation, customer check-in, operator review, delivery, cleanup; cite file/state/transcript evidence and flag any claimed outcome not backed by real-surface evidence. SCOPE: /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent current worktree, /tmp/ulw-20260806-115331.nMdb3v.md, dualcoachtest profile state. VERIFY: inspect current diff and durable artifacts; do not trust summaries. STOP WHEN: a criterion-by-criterion evidence table and production-readiness blocker list are complete.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4171522,"error_message":"Final-deliverable steer ignored after repeated silent-running checks; record lane inconclusive, not approval.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":539886,"turns":16,"tool_calls":82,"output_tokens":19340,"total_tokens":1713177,"generation_ms":436791,"tokens_per_second":44,"cost_usd":3.1834010000000004,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.8828533005519483,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7695852670593452}}