{"task_id":"st_019fd76c","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd4c6-0643-7514-a41b-c7184413a453","root_session_id":"019fd4c6-0643-7514-a41b-c7184413a453","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-06T14:14:12.976Z","updated_at":"2026-08-06T14:17:42.201Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-privacy-decision","task_summary":"Choose definitive Telegram privacy architecture","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Choose the definitive Telegram privacy architecture for DualCoach. This is a read-only executable decision assignment. DELIVERABLE: a concise decision memo choosing one model, with rejected alternatives, migration impact, and exact acceptance criteria. SCOPE: Read /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/retrospectives/dualcoach-live-qa-2026-08-06.md and /tmp/ulw-20260806-dualcoach-production-plan.md. Compare customer bot DM + staff-only review group against shared group/topic and per-customer group models. Ground in Telegram Bot API visibility semantics and observed live-QA privacy confusion. Do not edit files. VERIFY: The recommendation must prevent one customer from seeing staff or another customer's content while preserving trainer/owner/operator workflows. STOP WHEN: one recommended choice and its release gates are explicit.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4171522,"error_message":"No terminal memo after repeated checks and explicit final-deliverable steer; closing inconclusive and resolving from existing evidence.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":209216,"turns":4,"tool_calls":29,"output_tokens":6701,"total_tokens":190911,"generation_ms":182294,"tokens_per_second":37,"cost_usd":0.7280960000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.7048635924166632,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.4752836436675533}}