{"task_id":"st_019fd7a3","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","root_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-06T15:13:42.495Z","updated_at":"2026-08-06T15:16:02.660Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-golden-contract-executor","task_summary":"실행 가능한 Golden Path 계약과 failure matrix 작성","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Execute plan task `2. Write the Golden Path contract`.\n\nRead `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md` Specification/Todo 2, the immutable manifest JSON/MD, and the relevant current DualCoach implementation/test files under `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent` (read-only). Obey `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/AGENTS.md`. You may edit ONLY `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/dualcoach-golden-path-contract.md` using apply_patch. No product/test edits and no commit/push/reset/stash/clean/checkout/restore.\n\nCreate an executable, decision-complete contract for the real Telegram surface, not generic prose. It must define:\n- Exact actors and channel boundaries: customer DM, staff/operator room, provider boundary, durable state/outbox boundary.\n- Canonical lifecycle from onboarding through role review, activation, customer check-in, atomic generation enqueue, async draft generation, operator card, approval, explicit delivery, receipt reconciliation, and cleanup.\n- Privacy guard: customer health content and customer-specific role outputs never appear in staff room; staff receives only operator-safe card metadata.\n- Approval versus delivery semantics: approve stores immutable review and enqueues intent; deliver is a separate explicit authority transition; retries never infer delivery.\n- Startup/callback boundaries and exact failure interpretation.\n- For EVERY step: concrete command/request/event, expected visible UI, expected durable state, timeout/observable completion condition (no sleeps), binary pass/fail, operator recovery action, and cleanup.\n- Exactly-once outbox semantics: idempotency key, intent/attempt/receipt/unknown-delivery states, duplicate-callback behavior, process-restart behavior, unknown-provider response handling.\n- Failure matrix covering dirty/stale state, malformed update/callback, prompt injection/untrusted text, cancellation/restart at every durable transition, hung provider/callback/UI update, flaky async tests, misleading success output, repeated interruptions.\n- Explicit fresh-isolated live rehearsal prerequisites and safe customer-disable cleanup.\n- Candidate digest `19ed0e9232e240553b9a96a2e6a33d10f1096be49e5ebafc019287d75984e45c` and manifest boundaries.\n\nBaseline: state current gaps/NO-GO conditions rather than claiming implemented behavior. Manual QA for this doc: execute a consistency driver/review that mechanically checks every lifecycle row has all required columns, every required failure class has a row, and all privacy/exactly-once invariants appear. Record exact invocation/output in the artifact. No prose-pinning tests.\n\nCleanup: no temp files/processes/credentials/customers/runtime/product changes; retain only the contract artifact.\n\nReturn strict DoneClaim with changed_files, baseline, checks, manual_qa, adversarial coverage, cleanup, risks. Stop only when the artifact passes its mechanical completeness review.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n\n<Selection_Gate>\nBEFORE selecting this category, VERIFY ALL conditions:\n1. Task does NOT fit: quick (trivial), visual-engineering (UI), ultrabrain (deep logic), artistry (creative), writing (docs)\n2. Task requires substantial effort across multiple systems/modules\n3. Changes have broad impact or require careful coordination\n4. NOT just \"complex\" - must be genuinely unclassifiable AND high-effort\n\nIf task fits ANY other category, DO NOT select unspecified-high.\nIf task is unclassifiable but moderate-effort, use unspecified-low instead.\n</Selection_Gate>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":489237,"error_message":"No contract artifact after extensive reconnaissance and explicit finish-now steer; replacing with foreground executor.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":140151,"turns":3,"tool_calls":18,"output_tokens":2046,"total_tokens":104067,"generation_ms":41632,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":0.1622388,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.5403736492234019,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.36133737171758756}}