{"task_id":"st_019fe10b","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","root_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-08T11:03:48.448Z","updated_at":"2026-08-08T11:09:20.059Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-task7-hardening","task_summary":"Task 7 CRITICAL bypass와 CAS·identity·atomicity findings 전면 수정","description":"Task 7 hardening implementation","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Harden Task 7 to full Specification 7 compliance in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. You are the sole editor; preserve unrelated dirty/untracked work, do not edit .omo, commit, reset, stash, clean, activate releases, contact providers/Telegram, or touch real customers. Read the authoritative Task 7/Specification 7 plan plus the current candidate and independent audit artifact agent://st_019fe102. Current stable hashes are source ecfde83c454216bed08557be47ba4d7600ce51e1effd1aabba7d91d0ea86912a, tests 8511eee970d997f8f403fa376eee291fa37bca5faae2c10a5fee0ade207aedc9, current aggregate c757e0fb795ba0babaca8476b382873928ef7fd82f828cf0c342cf28a4bcae62. Resolve every established finding with failing-first tests and the smallest coherent architecture, preferably one mandatory Task 7 journal with legacy ledgers as projections: (1) no V2 legacy draft or edited child may approve/deliver without typed generation history; migrate safely once or fail closed; edited children must have predecessor-linked history; older approved drafts cannot be reused for newer check-ins. (2) generation, record digest, canonical check-in revision/event identity, and draft revision CAS pins must be mandatory at every public mutation and real card/callback boundary; stale cards must reject rather than default to current state. (3) use the canonical finalized check-in event_id, never wizard session_id. (4) Task 7 must not activate Task 8 queue/worker/provider generation orchestration; separate/gate any currently activated inline provider/card generation path without undoing unrelated work, while retaining Task 7 approval/delivery stale-card enforcement. (5) eliminate cross-ledger split states: approval and delivery projection writes must be atomic or durably recoverable/idempotently reconcilable under injected write failures. (6) align model/provider contract, generation-provider receipt, delivery-provider contract/receipt, retry attempt accounting, bounded typed failure categories, old-draft disposal, and terminal semantics. (7) reject successor timestamp regression and every missing/extra/noncanonical persisted field fail-closed. (8) add real branch tests for legacy bypass, edited-child history, card CAS, canonical event identity, older-draft reuse, cross-ledger fault injection/recovery, independent stale digest/draft revision, receipt state matrix, timestamp regression, terminal/nonretryable errors, and provider-call count versus attempts. (9) fix the Task 7-added `_generations_path` `reportUnannotatedClassAttribute` warning; no Task 7 changed symbol/line may add BasedPyright diagnostics. Existing 666 errors elsewhere must be independently classified with verifier-only temporary delta, never repository baselines or suppressions. Preserve `approved != delivery_pending != sent_audited`, deterministic digest-chain reload, two-attempt policy as defined by the plan, and Task 8 scope boundaries. Run focused/exhaustive tests, complete affected nutrition/Telegram regressions, Ruff, LSP where available, changed-line strict delta 0/0/0, offline build, content/diff checks, and isolated manual drivers including injected write failures and real card callbacks with zero network/provider/customer effects. Remove temporary artifacts and return failing-first evidence, exact candidate files/hashes/ordered digest, commands/results, real-surface observations, cleanup/non-touch receipt, and residual risks. Return PASS only when every CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM finding is demonstrably closed.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":489237,"error_message":"장시간 read-only 분석만 반복하고 편집 진전이 없어 구현 책임을 새 워커로 전환","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":331536,"turns":10,"tool_calls":44,"output_tokens":13521,"total_tokens":869153,"generation_ms":317257,"tokens_per_second":43,"cost_usd":1.580302,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9378233776043305,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8060287600276754}}