{"task_id":"st_019fe163","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","root_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-08T12:40:05.847Z","updated_at":"2026-08-08T12:57:03.705Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-task7-candidate-remediation","task_summary":"Fix Task 7 callback isolation, typing, and missing restart coverage","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Work in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. Continue Task 7 only. Preserve all unrelated dirty work; no commit/push/reset/stash/clean/release/network/provider/real Telegram/customer action. Candidate digest bb3a36f16afcb94762e9e2c7eabd551c993f3b69ee48fbbb28cfb3f0e69d7441 has independent FAILs. Deliver a new stable candidate receipt.\n\nBlocking defects to reproduce failing-first and fix minimally:\n1) Real physique save callback still invokes _humanize_korean_copy inline at telegram.py around 6926, reaching _request_physique_coaching_stage around 7549. Physique Telegram callbacks must invoke zero provider/generation pipeline inline. Add a regression against the actual callback path, watch it fail with the observed ['draft'], then remove/replace the inline provider-dependent humanization while retaining authority-derived behavior.\n2) Independent basedpyright found 23 errors in Task 7 symbol ranges, 15 on changed lines, using a temporary project config. Reproduce with the verifier-compatible command/config, classify exact diagnostics, and make Task 7 changed-symbol/new-line diagnostics zero without suppressions, casts-to-Any, ignores, or repository baseline changes. Do not fix unrelated whole-file debt.\n3) Add genuine restart/fault coverage called out by automated audit where absent: edited-child recovery after hard restart including partial projection; worker receipt and terminal/retryable outcomes after restart; persisted/reloaded timestamp regression; broader global lineage referential integrity; child/create projection-fault recovery. For Telegram adapter transport split after provider success but receipt/audit persistence failure, cover only if this belongs to Task 7's current adapter seam; otherwise provide exact proof why it belongs to a later named task and ensure current callback remains fail-closed/exactly-once within Task 7 contract.\n\nAlso ingest the manual PASS evidence already available: deleted journal, child generation write fault, retry/terminal, delivery intent refresh, adaptive authority path. Do not regress it.\n\nVerification required on final bytes: focused hardening, all affected suites, Ruff, scoped git diff --check including untracked test, UV_OFFLINE=1 uv build --offline, static forbidden-symbol/provider-inline checks, verifier-compatible basedpyright changed-symbol/new-line delta, hermetic manual callback probe showing zero provider/claim/release/transport before explicit delivery, hard-restart fault drivers, temp cleanup, scoped status non-touch, per-file SHA256 and ordered candidate digest. Return failing-first evidence, exact commands/results, coverage mapping, residual risks, and cleanup/non-touch receipt. Stop only with implementation and tests completed or one precise blocker.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":489237,"error_message":"Serialize Task 7 ownership; overlapping writer caused candidate drift and syntax collisions.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1017777,"turns":56,"tool_calls":110,"output_tokens":24111,"total_tokens":8566985,"generation_ms":558319,"tokens_per_second":43,"cost_usd":6.066820000000002,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9974707772233236,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9721131319506761}}