{"task_id":"st_019fe164","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","root_session_id":"019fd78b-bc20-7f7e-baca-b4bb0dc6b301","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-08T12:41:51.198Z","updated_at":"2026-08-08T12:57:03.708Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"dualcoach-task7-remediation3","task_summary":"Repair Task 7 authority, callback, atomicity, and typing failures","description":"Fix Task 7 adversarial failures","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Work only in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. Execute one goal: remediate the pinned Task 7 candidate so every blocking finding from the latest independent automated/manual/architecture audits is fixed. Deliverable: a new immutable candidate receipt with failing-first evidence, exact hashes/digest, tests, manual hermetic QA, type-delta evidence, cleanup, and non-touch evidence. Do not commit, push, reset, stash, clean, release, access network/providers/real Telegram/customers, or modify /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo. Preserve unrelated dirty work. Use apply_patch for edits and read for file inspection. Test-first and keep scope to Task 7.\n\nRequired defects to reproduce and fix:\n1) Authority deletion: marker-only deletion and ledger+marker deletion must fail closed after establishment. Never recreate authority or marker from projections. Bind source_digest to actual canonical authority bytes/root; make establishment/migration durable and distinguish legitimate initial legacy migration from deletion. Add restart tests and byte-exact non-mutation.\n2) Physique Telegram save callback still invokes _humanize_korean_copy -> _request_physique_coaching_stage inline. Remove all inline provider invocation from physique and adaptive callbacks. Task 8 exclusively owns provider/card generation orchestration; Telegram may enqueue/read/render authority only. Update expectations and prove actual callback path has zero provider/claim/release/transport before explicit delivery.\n3) Edited-child cross-ledger split: failure after child generation write but before request, canonical event, or draft projection must not leave an accepted orphan. Implement a minimal authoritative append-only transaction/intention/reconciliation design under existing single-host fcntl model (architecture recommendation Option A), not SQLite. Test every write boundary and hard restart/replay. Ensure deterministic convergence or exact rollback semantics.\n4) Worker API must be claim-bound and typed end-to-end: claim returns an opaque claim identity/CAS containing attempt/generation/worker binding; complete/release require it; stale worker cannot affect a newer attempt. Completion receipt must be derived/validated against persisted provider artifacts, not any 64-hex input. Typed retryable and terminal outcomes; bounded two attempts; restart tests.\n5) Delivery split must be recoverable through the real callback UX after provider/transport success and receipt/audit persistence failure, with refreshed current pins/reconcile operation and exactly-once transport. Test actual callback adapter with hermetic fake transport and hard restart.\n6) Complete mandatory fault/restart matrix: marker-only deletion, ledger+marker deletion, every child-generation/request/event/draft boundary, stale completion after reclaim, provider success then receipt-write failure, wrong-existing lineage predecessor, restart after each. Persisted/reloaded timestamp regression. Global lineage across multiple children and cycles.\n7) Global lineage must bind predecessor to declared parent, customer, check-in revision, exact parent tip and remain acyclic; unrelated existing digest must reject.\n8) Separate generation and delivery provider contract versions as well as receipts.\n9) Type quality: independently reproduce basedpyright using the project's real configuration and a HEAD/worktree baseline. Fix all diagnostics attributable to Task 7 changed symbols/lines without ignores, casts-to-Any, suppressions, baselines, or weakening checks. Do not promise whole-file zero if unrelated debt exists; provide exact reproducible baseline/candidate delta and changed-symbol mapping. Also reconcile the inconsistent prior type commands rather than accepting reported counts blindly.\n10) Add genuinely restart-based tests for child recovery, worker outcomes, adapter delivery recovery, persisted timestamp rejection, global lineage, and projection fault recovery. Collection counts must be reported from exact commands, never copied from prior receipts.\n\nBefore editing, inspect current bytes and confirm digest bb3a36f16afcb94762e9e2c7eabd551c993f3b69ee48fbbb28cfb3f0e69d7441 or report drift and pin the actual starting state. Read the approved plan and Task 7 evidence context in /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach, but do not edit orchestration state. Return concise finding-to-fix mapping, exact commands/results, real-surface hermetic QA, candidate hashes and ordered digest, cleanup/non-touch receipt, and any remaining blocker. Stop only when all listed defects pass or when a precise irreducible blocker is proven.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":489237,"error_message":"Serialize Task 7 ownership; overlapping writer caused candidate drift and syntax collisions.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":912361,"turns":58,"tool_calls":96,"output_tokens":36642,"total_tokens":10705394,"generation_ms":787252,"tokens_per_second":47,"cost_usd":7.6372599999999995,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9897963102843462,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9749294013020454}}