{"task_id":"st_019ff92a","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-13T03:29:27.847Z","updated_at":"2026-08-15T03:46:45.114Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"task23-generation-and-staff-route-recovery-v1","task_summary":"Recover Task23 generation and operator card","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Sole delegated Task23 blocker repair; do not advance Task24. Read plan/boulder/ledger and st_019ff91c evidence first. Two connected post-checkin failures: token90f6df222e870e58 transitioned generation_pending->generating->generation_failed nonretryable invalid_model_output; automatic operator card failed `Message thread not found`. Begin read-only incident audit with >=3 hypotheses each. For generation, authenticate provider/model request/response redacted shape, schema parse/grounding failure, correction attempt, claim/lease/history; determine whether valid content was rejected by parser/schema drift or provider returned invalid shape. Preserve exact finalized checkin event/revision and token; no new job/token, no claim deletion/direct JSON. Test-first live-shaped reproduction, implement smallest retry-safe correction/reconciliation so existing failed job can be explicitly resumed after product defect/auth fix, at most one bounded correction, resulting in one draft revision or a truthful retryable state. For staff route, authenticate configured forum chat/topic, prior gen29 route, current Telegram getForumTopic/message evidence, whether topic59 was deleted/migrated and exact canonical owner surface. Do not guess/create group/topic or send customer content to wrong surface. If configured topic is stale, implement/use supported readiness migration to an existing authenticated owner-only topic or DM only if plan contract permits; otherwise stop with exact human admin action. Fix normal runtime publication so one operator card for this token is sent exactly once after draft, stale route fails before provider send, duplicates/restart safe. Reseal once if bytes change; run focused generation/operator-card/Task23/restart tests, Ruff/Ty owned files, compileall/direct verifier. Controlled live retry under valid HERMES_HOME, preserve delivery0 and synthetic-only scope, restart and verify draft/card receipt count1, no Task24 approval/send. Store redacted evidence. No plan/ledger/todo/commit/push/release. Return DoneClaim or one exact human-only route blocker.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n\n<Selection_Gate>\nBEFORE selecting this category, VERIFY ALL conditions:\n1. Task does NOT fit: quick (trivial), visual-engineering (UI), ultrabrain (deep logic), artistry (creative), writing (docs)\n2. Task requires substantial effort across multiple systems/modules\n3. Changes have broad impact or require careful coordination\n4. NOT just \"complex\" - must be genuinely unclassifiable AND high-effort\n\nIf task fits ANY other category, DO NOT select unspecified-high.\nIf task is unclassifiable but moderate-effort, use unspecified-low instead.\n</Selection_Gate>\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as read-only Task23 failure diagnosis - I inspected the durable state, validator, provider path, and successful fixtures without mutation.\n\n**Finding:** token `90f6df222e870e58` exhausted attempt `2/2`. Each attempt reached `semantic_grounding correction=1`, then terminal `invalid_model_output`; no draft, provider receipt, or delivery exists.\n\n- Failure JSON path: `draft-generations.json[token][5].error.code = \"invalid_model_output\"`; `retryable=false`.\n- No parser/schema JSON-path diagnostic was recorded. The validator returns only `None`.\n- The requested two failed provider envelopes are not durable: failed raw strings are discarded. Raw output is persisted only after validation as `coach_artifacts.raw_coach_output`; that ledger does not exist for this token.\n\n**Contract and correction**\n- Model contract: `nutrition-coach-response-v2`; provider contract: `chat-completions-v1`.\n- Configured/default draft route is `openai-codex` / `gpt-5.6-terra`; provider readiness passed.\n- Expected response: JSON object with exactly 11 keys; `recommendation` is an object with exactly 4 keys.\n- Cloud generation requests a 256-token completion but does **not** enforce native JSON-object response format.\n- Correction prompt required one JSON object, exact offered identifiers/facts, and the supplied schema. Its result failed the same opaque validator gate.\n\n**Hypotheses**\n1. **Parser/schema drift rejecting valid output:** not proven. Current tests and two archived accepted artifacts parse the same 11-key/4-target-key V2 shape successfully.\n2. **Provider emitted Markdown, non-JSON, or wrong fields:** possible, but unprovable; the bytes were not retained. Both outputs did reach validation as nonempty strings.\n3. **Grounding validator overly strict:** not generally supported. It accepts current golden fixtures and archived valid artifacts, but may have rejected a specific unavailable output.\n4. **Model/config mismatch:** not supported. The configured model/provider align with the recorded contracts; this was not auth, transport, or provider-readiness failure.\n\n**Message 140**\n- It is the single owner-DM operator status card, not a customer delivery.\n- In `generation_failed`, it displays only `재시도` (retry).\n- That button invokes the owner/CAS terminal-repair transition; it exposes a retry control but cannot retry this token now because the bounded attempt budget is exhausted. It has no approve/send button in its current state.\n\n**Root cause:** failed provider outputs are collapsed into `validate_judgment(...) -> None` and discarded before persistence, leaving an opaque strict-validation failure. A more specific claim about malformed provider JSON versus a particular grounding rule is not evidence-backed.\n\n**Recommended action:** keep this token terminal; fix the cloud draft path to enforce structured JSON and retain redacted failed-output validation diagnostics in a disposable test, then authorize a new recovery policy rather than retrying this exhausted token.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":342460,"turns":9,"tool_calls":60,"output_tokens":11137,"total_tokens":1605191,"generation_ms":214050,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":0.9219055999999999,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.94035104278506,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8363882277513811}}