{"task_id":"st_019ff976","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-13T04:52:30.312Z","updated_at":"2026-08-15T03:46:45.114Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"task23-structured-replacement-generation-v1","task_summary":"Create approved Task23 replacement generation","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"User explicitly authorizes exactly one Task23 replacement generation while preserving terminal token90f6df222e870e58. Sole delegated implementation/live executor. Read plan/boulder/ledger and st_019ff92a evidence first. Test-first implement smallest cloud draft hardening: request native structured JSON object/schema when provider API/model supports it, parse exact nutrition-coach-response-v2, persist privacy-safe validation diagnostic code/JSON path/shape metadata on failure (never raw customer/model prose), and retain failed-output structural audit within bounded hashes if contract permits. Implement explicit owner-authorized replacement transition: from exact exhausted terminal token2/2 + finalized event/revision to exactly one new token/job, predecessor/replaces binding, no reuse/deletion, no second replacement on duplicate/restart, stale/wrong actor/revision/provider fails closed. Existing token remains terminal audit. New job gets normal bounded attempts. Operator message140 retry callback may invoke only this explicit authorized replacement if bound to exact owner/card/generation and policy receipt; or use a one-purpose CLI with this authorization evidence if safer. RED tests for duplicate replacement, crash boundaries, structured response, diagnostic redaction, old token immutability; GREEN focused generation/operator/Task23/restart. Reseal once; Ruff/Ty owned files, compileall/direct verifier. Live: authenticate current owner route/card and write an approval evidence receipt for this user's explicit authorization without fabricating Telegram owner callback; use the supported CLI/operator authority boundary already approved by user. Create replacement exactly once, run provider worker with HERMES_HOME; event-confirm draft_created exactly1 for new token and Owner DM operator card updated/published exactly once, no approval/send. Controlled restart proves old terminal + new draft stable, no duplicate jobs/cards. Customer nutrition delivery0. If provider fails again, stop after bounded attempts without another replacement. No plan/ledger/todo/commit/push/release. Store redacted evidence and return DoneClaim with old/new token linkage, diagnostics, draft/card IDs, tests/PIDs/delivery0.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n\n<Selection_Gate>\nBEFORE selecting this category, VERIFY ALL conditions:\n1. Task does NOT fit: quick (trivial), visual-engineering (UI), ultrabrain (deep logic), artistry (creative), writing (docs)\n2. Task requires substantial effort across multiple systems/modules\n3. Changes have broad impact or require careful coordination\n4. NOT just \"complex\" - must be genuinely unclassifiable AND high-effort\n\nIf task fits ANY other category, DO NOT select unspecified-high.\nIf task is unclassifiable but moderate-effort, use unspecified-low instead.\n</Selection_Gate>\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as read-only forensic evidence review - I inspected persisted records and code paths only; no live action was taken.\n\n**Successor `664046dbca210afc` persisted diagnostics**\n- Stage: `generation_failed`, generation `3`, attempt `1/2`.\n- Terminal code: `invalid_model_output`.\n- Detail: `model output failed strict validation`.\n- Retryable: `false`.\n- Validation audit hash: `6ec361a7f699e5534c9b6c817e3c555fdd24e62286da7bf3232bf4541a3e0e18`.\n- Draft revision and provider receipt: both `null`.\n\nNot persisted: individual diagnostic code(s), JSON path, actual JSON type, actual key set/count, expected-vs-actual values, raw response hash(es), or a parser-versus-semantic classification. The audit hash commits to those privacy-safe per-pass hashes but is intentionally non-reversible.\n\nThe worker performs one correction pass after a rejected first pass. Terminal failure means that correction also did not yield an accepted `ValidatedCoachProposal`; no draft was created.\n\n**Parent comparison**\n- Parent `90f6df222e870e58`: generation `6`, attempt `2/2`, `generation_failed`, `invalid_model_output`, non-retryable, no draft/provider receipt.\n- Parent detail was broader: `model output failed schema or semantic grounding`; it has no validation audit hash.\n- Its redacted postcheck records one semantic correction, but no JSON-path/type/key diagnostics. Neither parent nor successor retained raw model content.\n\n**Structured-output enforcement**\n- The cloud request path constructs:\n  - `response_format.type = \"json_schema\"`\n  - name `nutrition_coach_response_v2`\n  - `strict = true`\n  - top-level object with `additionalProperties: false`, all 11 response fields required, and a closed `recommendation` object requiring exactly `calories`, `protein_g`, `carbs_g`, `fat_g`.\n- Actual transmitted request payload and provider schema acknowledgement were **not persisted**. `generation_provider_receipt` is `null`; there is no provider response ID or acknowledgement record.\n- The profile has no explicit draft provider/model values, so code defaults are `openai-codex` / `gpt-5.6-terra`, but the resolved provider/model is likewise not durably recorded.\n\nStrict JSON schema enforcement can still produce `invalid_model_output`: it governs JSON structure, while the deterministic validator also requires matching customer/revision bindings, allowed evidence/focus IDs, target consistency, grounded numbers, recommendation/copy consistency, and safety constraints. The evidence cannot establish whether this was a provider schema miss, semantic grounding miss, or validator defect. It is **not deterministically fixable from retained evidence without the discarded response**; nor is genuine model semantic failure proven.\n\n**Card 141 and authority**\n- Label: `Check-in saved\\nDraft generation failed`\n- Buttons: one `재시도` button.\n- The button is UI state, not new authority to retry.\n- Current authority route: owner DM `(\"8693203710\", \"8693203710\", \"0\")`; card state is `published`, generation `3`.\n\n**Recommended next action:** obtain fresh explicit owner authorization before any retry or replacement; leave the terminal successor and card untouched.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":157746,"turns":4,"tool_calls":13,"output_tokens":8153,"total_tokens":757661,"generation_ms":154712,"tokens_per_second":53,"cost_usd":0.2955528,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9774653878485269,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9645580834360674}}