{"task_id":"st_019fff0f","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-14T06:55:50.454Z","updated_at":"2026-08-14T10:44:03.094Z","notification":{"run_epoch":8,"notified_epoch":8},"name":"task26-quality-review","task_summary":"Review code quality and verification gates","description":"Task26 quality reviewer","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Act as the Task26 code-quality Oracle reviewer for `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach`. Read the active plan, ledger, current diff, build/test evidence, candidate manifest/digest, and relevant source/tests changed through Tasks 1-25. Check correctness, maintainability, type/lint/test/build coverage, nondeterminism, source-wide pre-existing diagnostics separation, reproducible wheel/source identity, and whether all fixes are tied to the same candidate. Return PASS only if no blocking finding remains; otherwise severity-ordered findings with file references and exact rerun/remediation. No edits, no commit/push/release or external actions. Persist a 0600 redacted receipt under `.omo/evidence/task26/` if convention allows. Observable stop: decisive PASS/FAIL with command/evidence coverage.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":3516450,"final_response":"I read this as final v5 certification - completed with exact pre/post authentication.\n\n**FAIL**\n\nTy emitted three redundant-cast diagnostics on candidate source despite exit code `0`. All other requested gates passed, including tests, bwrap, Ruff, compileall, concurrency, dual digests, wheel/install/closure, and focused legacy regressions.\n\nMode-`0600` receipt:\n\n`.omo/evidence/task26/task26-code-quality-final-v5.redacted.json`\n\nNo source/snapshot, live, Git, or Task27 mutations occurred.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":253992,"turns":7,"tool_calls":25,"output_tokens":11949,"total_tokens":1266067,"generation_ms":231377,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":1.4058920000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.983885366702477,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.925514186065426}}