{"task_id":"st_019fff10","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-14T06:55:50.818Z","updated_at":"2026-08-14T11:28:49.561Z","notification":{"run_epoch":7,"notified_epoch":7},"name":"task26-security-review","task_summary":"Audit privacy authority and fail-closed controls","description":"Task26 security reviewer","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Act as the Task26 security/privacy Oracle reviewer for `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach`. Audit the exact fixed candidate and canonical evidence: customer DM isolation, customer-free staff membership, Owner-only authority, wrong-role/stale/duplicate fail-closed behavior, callback binding/CAS, request/schema seals, redaction, no trainer marker/claim/invite/card/route/data access, synthetic-only delivery gate, cleanup and archived receipt integrity. Return PASS only if release-blocking security/privacy findings are absent and evidence is candidate-bound. Otherwise report severity-ordered findings and remediation. No edits or external actions. Persist a 0600 redacted receipt under `.omo/evidence/task26/` if convention allows. Observable stop: decisive PASS/FAIL and residual risks.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":3516450,"final_response":"I read this as an immediate v5 stop - I’ve halted adjudication and will preserve read-only findings for v6.\n\n- No v5 PASS/FAIL receipt was written.\n- Snapshot and product source were not mutated.\n- No live, Git, delivery, service, or Task27 actions occurred.\n- Provenance digest/permission findings and quality Ty diagnostics remain unresolved.\n- Task26 v5 is not approved; awaiting v6.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":407828,"turns":9,"tool_calls":41,"output_tokens":13146,"total_tokens":1161392,"generation_ms":264326,"tokens_per_second":50,"cost_usd":1.442362,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.957967370189844,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9082931706272}}