{"task_id":"st_01a0002e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-14T12:10:32.586Z","updated_at":"2026-08-14T13:27:38.634Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"codex-aux-provider-auth-probe-research","task_summary":"Find supported CodexAuxiliaryClient auth probe","description":"Find supported Codex auth probe","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Investigate /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach and the referenced hermes-agent/profile/runtime code to identify a supported fail-closed authentication probe for the configured `openai-codex` provider whose resolution returns `CodexAuxiliaryClient`. Read the active plan, latest Task26 provider-auth receipt, provider resolver/client implementation, installed package, config, and any local SDK/CLI source. Do not edit files, call Telegram, start services, generate customer content, or mutate provider/account state. Determine, with exact code references and runnable command shapes, whether there is: (a) a genuinely read-only authenticated endpoint supported by this client, (b) an OAuth/session/token status interface tied to the exact production credentials, (c) a minimal production-path request that can serve as an authenticated synthetic probe without persisting content or delivery, or (d) no supported probe. Compare security semantics—what each proves and does not prove. Return one recommended fail-closed implementation path and exact tests/receipt fields. Never expose secrets or account identity.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":3516450,"final_response":"I have all the evidence needed. Here is the determination.\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/dualcoach_admin.py  — provider-auth gate (`provider_auth_check` l.396, `_probe` l.306, `_models_list` l.291, `_MODEL_LIST_UNSUPPORTED_PROVIDERS` l.42, exit table l.65–93)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/agent/auxiliary_client.py — `resolve_provider_client` l.3934; `CodexAuxiliaryClient.__init__` l.1421; `_CODEX_AUX_BASE_URL` l.502 = `https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex`; `_build_codex_client` l.2471; `_read_codex_access_token` l.1869\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/hermes_cli/auth.py — `get_codex_auth_status` l.5977; `get_auth_status` l.6145 (routes `openai-codex` → codex)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/hermes_cli/auth_commands.py — `auth_status_command` l.509 (prints `<provider>: logged in`)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/hermes_cli/doctor.py — codex auth row l.1090 (reads `get_codex_auth_status`)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/dualcoach-provider-auth-candidate-ca49f7561f22b870cc70aa135d15eef66129e3a39ffa3c4be284f0484a345706/ — sealed candidate (gate-receipt PASS on test gates; checkpoint SEALED)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/senpi-task/logs/st_01a00008.jsonl — line 226 records the frozen outcome: `probe_unknown` / exit 29 for the installed command\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n## Honest determination: (d) is the accurate server-side verdict; (b) exists as the only read-only supported auth surface, and it is local, not server-validating.\n\n### (a) A genuinely read-only authenticated endpoint supported by `CodexAuxiliaryClient`? — No.\n`CodexAuxiliaryClient.__init__` (`agent/auxiliary_client.py:1421`) exposes only `self.chat`, `self.api_key`, `self.base_url`, `close()`, and the private `self._real_client`. The only callable it wraps is `chat.completions.create` (the `_CodexCompletionsAdapter` translating to the Responses API) — that is generation/delivery, not read-only. It does not expose `.models` directly. The gate's `_models_list` (`dualcoach_admin.py:291`) falls back to `client._real_client.models.list`, which is the underlying OpenAI instance pointed at `_CODEX_AUX_BASE_URL = https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex` (l.502). That backend has no stable, documented `/models` contract. Calling it does not return a list-shaped success, so `_probe` fails closed to `PROBE_UNKNOWN` (29) — exactly what the frozen installed command produced (recorded in `st_01a00008.jsonl:226`). It cannot be relied on as a read-only auth success endpoint.\n\n### (b) An OAuth/session/token status interface tied to the exact production credentials? — Yes, but local only.\n- `get_codex_auth_status()` (`hermes_cli/auth.py:5977`) reads the credential pool (`agent.credential_pool.load_pool(\"openai-codex\")`) then the legacy provider state, returning `logged_in`, `auth_store`, `last_refresh`, `source`, and `api_key`. It decodes the JWT only for expiry (`_codex_access_token_is_expiring(..., 0)`), performing **no network call**.\n- Runnable, read-only, ties to the exact production store:\n  - `hermes auth status openai-codex` (`auth_status_command`, `auth_commands.py:509`) → prints `openai-codex: logged in` or `openai-codex: logged out (<reason>)`.\n  - `hermes doctor` → row `OpenAI Codex auth: (logged in)` via `get_codex_auth_status` (`doctor.py:1090`).\n- **Semantics:** this proves the token exists locally, has a decodable shape, and is not past its JWT `exp`. It does **not** prove the token is valid against production — a revoked, server-side-invalidated, or rate-limited token still reports `logged_in: True`. Fail-closed value: a `False`/absent token is a reliable credential-missing signal.\n\n### (c) A minimal production-path request that is an authenticated synthetic probe without persisting content or delivery? — No.\nThe only request `CodexAuxiliaryClient` can actually make is `chat.completions.create` → Responses generation, which bills usage and can persist/deliver. The `models.list` probe is the intended read-only alternative but is unsupported on the codex base URL. There is no server-present, read-only, non-generating call supported by this client.\n\n### (d) No supported probe? — Effectively yes for the server-present path.\nFor `openai-codex` → `CodexAuxiliaryClient`, the honest, fail-closed reading is: there is no genuinely read-only **server-validating** endpoint. The existing `models.list` probe correctly fails closed (`probe_unknown`/29). The only supported read-only gap that closes is the **local** token-status interface in (b).\n\n## Recommended fail-closed implementation path (single)\nKeep the existing `provider_auth_check` flow as the authority (it already fails closed) and add one codex-specific branch that uses the local status interface from (b) to make the failure *classifiable* instead of ambiguous:\n\n1. In `provider_auth_check` (`dualcoach_admin.py:396`), in the `openai-codex` path (only when `_resolve_canonical_provider` returns it and it is not in `_MODEL_LIST_UNSUPPORTED_PROVIDERS`):\n   - call `hermes_cli.auth.get_codex_auth_status()`; if `logged_in` is `False` → short-circuit to `CREDENTIAL_MISSING` (exit 22) **before** building the client / probing; do not run `_probe`.\n   - if `logged_in` is `True` → proceed to the existing `_resolve_provider_client` + `_probe`; on codex this yields `PROBE_UNKNOWN` (29) → fail closed, **never** `READY`.\n2. Never copy `status[\"api_key\"]` or `status[\"source\"]` into the receipt/stdout — only consume the `logged_in` boolean. Keeps token redaction intact.\n3. Optionally append `\"auth_status_scope\": \"local\"` and `\"auth_status_source\": \"hermes_cli.auth.get_codex_auth_status\"` to `_receipt_payload` when the branch runs.\n\nRationale: this converts an ambiguous `probe_unknown` into a clear `credential_missing` when the OAuth token is genuinely absent/expired locally, while the server probe still guards against falsely asserting `READY` when only a stale local token exists. It is read-only, touches no provider/account state, and never generates or delivers.\n\nRunnable shapes (read-only):\n- `dualcoach_admin provider-auth check --json --receipt-dir <dir>` (current frozen command; codex → `probe_unknown`, exit 29).\n- `hermes auth status openai-codex` (local status; `openai-codex: logged in` / `logged out (<reason>)`).\n- `hermes doctor` (codex auth row is local-status only).\n\n## Exact tests\nAdd to `tests/gateway/test_dualcoach_admin_provider_auth.py` (new parametrized cases, mirroring the existing `_check` helper), monkeypatching `admin._load_production_config`, `admin._resolve_provider_client`, and a `get_codex_auth_status` stub in `admin`:\n- provider `openai-codex`, status `{\"logged_in\": False}` → assert `result is ProviderAuthResult.CREDENTIAL_MISSING`, `exit is ProviderAuthExit.CREDENTIAL_MISSING` (22), resolver `calls == []`, `payload[\"success\"] is False`.\n- provider `openai-codex`, status `{\"logged_in\": True}` but resolver returns `(None, None)` → `CREDENTIAL_MISSING`; resolver called once with `(\"openai-codex\", model)`.\n- provider `openai-codex`, status `{\"logged_in\": True}`, resolver returns a `CodexAuxiliaryClient`-shaped obj without a usable models list → `PROBE_UNKNOWN` (29).\n- redaction: a stub status containing a bogus token value must not appear in `json.dumps(receipt.payload)` or CLI stdout.\n\n## Receipt fields (unchanged schema, plus codex-branch additions)\n- Base (unchanged): `schema` = `dualcoach-provider-auth-receipt-v1`, `command`, `command_version`, `timestamp_utc`, `candidate_digest`, `config_sha256`, `provider_adapter` = `\"agent.auxiliary_client.resolve_provider_client\"`, `provider_adapter_version` = `\"v1\"`, `probe` = `\"models.list\"`, `result`, `exit_code`, `success`, `configured_provider` = `\"openai-codex\"`, `receipt_sha256`.\n- Codex branch additions: `auth_status_scope` = `\"local\"`, `auth_status_source` = `\"hermes_cli.auth.get_codex_auth_status\"`.\n- Redaction: `config_sha256` derived from the `_redacted_config` (secrets stripped); the codex branch must emit no `api_key`/token/source value on stdout or disk.\n</result>\n\n<next_steps>\nI recommend, with the evidence above, that no `READY` result is ever produced for `openai-codex`; the correct status to preserve is `probe_unknown`/29 on the server probe, optionally upgrading to `credential_missing`/22 via the local `get_codex_auth_status` pre-gate only when the token is provably absent/expired locally. This matches the sealed candidate and the frozen fail-closed outcome. No code changes were made (read-only investigation, per request).\n</next_steps>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":183702,"turns":17,"tool_calls":45,"output_tokens":12445,"total_tokens":1079267,"generation_ms":106380,"tokens_per_second":117,"cost_usd":0,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9732738916925027,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8494762950145385}}