{"task_id":"st_01a000b1","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-14T14:33:58.419Z","updated_at":"2026-08-15T03:46:45.125Z","notification":{"run_epoch":8,"notified_epoch":8},"name":"task26-owner-card-emission-debug","task_summary":"Diagnose why the Owner review card was never emitted","description":"Diagnose missing Owner review card emission","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: determine and minimally repair why the already-launched Task26 synthetic clean window did not create or persist the first owner_review Telegram card. Deliverable: a verified root-cause report plus the minimal tested repair and an exact post-repair next action/evidence pointer. Work in /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach and sibling /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. Authoritative state: one controller launch succeeded for arm candidate digest f9a461..., hermes-gateway-dualcoachtest.service is active/running PID 3836302, but a 30-second event-driven inotify+journal subscription observed no state event and the onboarding publication outbox ledger/emergency files remain empty with SHA-256 8df495.... Do not relaunch the controller, rerun provider auth, call Telegram getUpdates, send/click Telegram, activate any real customer, commit, push, or release. Follow the debugging skill: form at least three hypotheses and discriminate them using service unit ExecStart/environment, profile config/state, deployed package equality, journal, process descriptors, and the controller launch contract. Confirm root cause before editing. Lock it with a deterministic failing test, apply the smallest repair through source/candidate packaging as required, run LSP/focused tests, and use supported service lifecycle only if needed to verify card creation without clicking it. Preserve exactly-once/idempotency and candidate binding; if a new candidate/re-arm is required, stop before any second launch and report that precise boundary. No broad unrelated cleanup.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as fail-closed cleanup only - completed through production APIs and systemd.\n\n**PASS cleanup**\n\n- Both sessions: `EXPIRED`, generation 2\n- Both invite tokens rejected\n- Live `PREPARED` sessions: 0\n- Registry customers, activations, deliveries, publications, owner reviews: all 0\n- Watcher PID `3954026`: exited status 3, stopped/reset/unloaded\n- Watcher unit: `not-found`, PID 0\n- Gateway PID `3948382`: stopped/reset\n- Gateway: `inactive/dead`, PID 0, result `success`\n- Third invite created: no\n\nPrivate audit receipt:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-expired-human-window-cleanup-5e6f2f2a01321ac89c2950e511e7346d23070c51146c14c22c04db54034b28f1/cleanup-blocked-audit-receipt.json`\n\n- Mode: `0600`\n- SHA-256: `08fe1b6556e991c8f90fb4204fd63abe23d83917529c08e21b6da6d41930f414`\n\nThe receipt records one verification-wrapper exit `1`: canonical expiry had already committed, but the wrapper incorrectly expected `expire_unbound()` to return only changed sessions rather than the complete ledger. Process-boundary verification then passed.\n\n**Sole remaining human action:** authorize a fresh canonical invite window only when synthetic actor `8527916639` is ready to open it immediately. No valid Telegram link or Start action currently exists.\n\nNo controller launch, provider request, manual update consumption, Telegram action, activation, source edit, commit, push, or release occurred.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":172129,"turns":8,"tool_calls":9,"output_tokens":7212,"total_tokens":373587,"generation_ms":163798,"tokens_per_second":44,"cost_usd":0.6450990000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9218836565096953,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8510624360286592}}