{"task_id":"st_01a002c1","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T00:10:50.489Z","updated_at":"2026-08-15T03:46:45.125Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"ui-runtime-truth-ulw","task_summary":"Trace completed-resident worker runtime lifecycle","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Reproduce and diagnose the Senpi completed-resident worker revival state using runtime evidence only. This is an executable read-only assignment, not a context handoff.\nDELIVERABLE: One concise report with exact task record states, process/session facts, event ordering from completed -> task_send -> revived, and one falsifiable root-cause candidate. Include literal commands and artifact paths.\nSCOPE: /projects/richard/omo-native-pirate packages/senpi-task and packages/omo-senpi plus a disposable isolated runtime. Do not edit source. Do not touch dualcoach runtime.\nVERIFY: Prove every claim from observed values; distinguish no-task, completed, resident, running, and terminal states. Journal and clean disposable artifacts.\nSTOP WHEN: The report contains the first observed divergence or says BLOCKED with the exact missing capability. Before long work report `WORKING: runtime truth - <phase>`.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as runtime reproduction and diagnosis - I ran the isolated Senpi harness, preserved evidence, and stopped at the first reported divergence.\n\n## Result\n\nCompleted-resident revival was reproduced on Senpi `2026.8.14`.\n\n- Task: `st_01a002c2`\n- Parent session: `01a002c2-af96-765d-97ab-24b08070e033`\n- Child session: `01a002c2-b4e5-7f33-90a2-08629d2aa5f4`\n- Execution: `in-process`; task record had no PID.\n- Final record: `status=completed`, `residency_state=persisted_only`, `notification.run_epoch=1`.\n- Four isolated Senpi scenario PIDs were launched; `leakedPids=0`.\n- Real Senpi state changes: none attributed to the run.\n\n## Observed ordering\n\nDurable task log:\n\n```text\nrunning/resident\nassistant_message: first unit complete\ncompleted/resident\nrevived: run_epoch=1\nassistant_message: second unit complete\ncompleted/resident\ncompleted/persisted_only\nsuspended: quit\n```\n\nParent events establish the requested boundary:\n\n```text\ncompletion wake: status=completed\ntask_send start: {\"to\":\"e2echild\",\"message\":\"do the second unit\"}\ntask_send end: {\"kind\":\"revived\",\"task_id\":\"st_01a002c2\",\"run_epoch\":1}\ncompletion wake: status=completed, second unit complete\n```\n\nThe same child session JSONL contains both the original prompt and follow-up, proving session reuse.\n\nState distinctions from observed values:\n\n- **No-task:** invalid-category flow returned `task_id=\"\"`, `status=plan_error`; zero task records.\n- **Running:** initial tool result and store transition reported `running`.\n- **Completed:** terminal run status observed after each response.\n- **Resident:** independent residency axis; the first terminal state was `completed/resident`, hence still messageable.\n- **Terminal:** not a separate stored value; `completed` was the observed terminal status.\n- **Shutdown:** residency changed to `persisted_only`, followed by `suspended`.\n\n## First divergence\n\nHarness verdict was `FAIL` solely because `task_output_peek=FAIL`; observed `task_output_event_count=0`. Revival, ordered JSONL, wake delivery, isolation, and cleanup checks passed. The driver itself exited `0`.\n\n## Falsifiable root-cause candidate\n\nThe revival path reuses the resident handle and increments `run_epoch`, but does not persist a new `running` transition: the log goes directly from `completed/resident` through `revived` to the second response and another `completed/resident`.\n\nFalsification: delay the second child response and read its task record after the `revived` result. This candidate predicts it remains `status=completed,residency_state=resident` while the second turn is executing; observing `status=running` would falsify it.\n\n## Commands and artifacts\n\nExecuted:\n\n```bash\ncd /projects/richard/omo-native-pirate\nTASK_E2E_OUT_DIR=/tmp/senpi-runtime-truth-st_01a002c1/evidence \\\nSENPI_BIN=/home/cube/.local/bin/senpi \\\nnode packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/task-e2e.mjs\n```\n\nExtraction:\n\n```bash\njq -c 'select((.type==\"tool_execution_start\" or .type==\"tool_execution_end\") and\n  (.toolName==\"task\" or .toolName==\"task_send\" or .toolName==\"task_output\") or\n  (.type==\"message_end\" and .message.customType==\"omo-senpi:wake\"))' \\\n  /tmp/senpi-runtime-truth-st_01a002c1/evidence/main.stdout.json.log\n```\n\nEvidence root:\n\n```text\n/tmp/senpi-runtime-truth-st_01a002c1/\n├── journal.txt\n├── SHA256SUMS\n├── driver.stdout\n└── evidence/runtime-state/\n    ├── task-record.json\n    ├── task-events.jsonl\n    ├── parent-task-events.jsonl\n    ├── parent-session.jsonl\n    ├── child-session.jsonl\n    └── observed-counts.txt\n```\n\nAll four disposable `/tmp/omo-senpi-qa-*` sandboxes were removed; retained evidence is checksummed. No source was edited and the dualcoach runtime was not touched.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":197864,"turns":9,"tool_calls":21,"output_tokens":7666,"total_tokens":429749,"generation_ms":147495,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":0.764459,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9652060325377033,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8297135871380747}}