{"task_id":"st_01a002c2","status":"completed","residency_state":"persisted_only","parent_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","root_session_id":"019fe727-6018-700d-9bb7-2ba4611da8e8","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T00:10:50.852Z","updated_at":"2026-08-15T03:46:45.126Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"ui-projection-ulw","task_summary":"Trace task state into Senpi TUI widget","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"TASK: Trace the Senpi task state-to-TUI projection for a completed resident revived by task_send. This is an executable read-only assignment, not a context handoff.\nDELIVERABLE: Exact file:symbol call graph from task_send through TaskRecord mutation, store observer, status UI filter, and setWidget; identify the first condition that can suppress a revived row and the evidence needed to distinguish it. No speculative fix.\nSCOPE: /projects/richard/omo-native-pirate packages/senpi-task and packages/omo-senpi. Do not edit source or generated bundles. Do not touch dualcoach runtime.\nVERIFY: Cite file:line facts and existing tests; compare source and generated runtime boundaries.\nSTOP WHEN: One falsifiable projection diagnosis is returned or BLOCKED with exact reason. Before long work report `WORKING: UI projection - <phase>`.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"final_response":"I read this as a completed read-only projection trace - below is the exact call graph and one falsifiable suppression diagnosis.\n\n## Projection diagnosis\n\nA correctly revived record is mutated to `status:\"running\"` and reaches the mutation observer. For a correctly scoped TUI session, the first row-specific condition that can suppress it is:\n\n```ts\nmanager.wasBackground(record.task_id) === true\n```\n\nThe real manager always implements `wasBackground`, so status UI selects `backgroundWidgetRows`, not `buildWidgetRows`. A revived foreground task remains non-background and is removed before the active-status filter or `setWidget` row path.\n\n## Exact source call graph\n\n1. `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/index.ts:registerTaskTools`\n   - Registers `createTaskSendTool` at lines 122-143.\n\n2. `packages/senpi-task/src/tools/control/send.ts:createTaskSendTool.execute`\n   - Line 109 calls `runTaskSend`.\n   - `runTaskSend` lines 41-61 calls `manager.sendToTask(... deliverAs:\"steer\")`.\n\n3. `packages/senpi-task/src/manager/manager.ts:TaskManagerImpl.sendToTask`\n   - Lines 336-337 delegates to `#steering.sendToTask`.\n\n4. `packages/senpi-task/src/steering/engine.ts:createSteeringEngine.sendToTask`\n   - Lines 44-70 resolves the record, classifies it with `messageability`, and dispatches to `reviveTerminal`.\n   - `packages/senpi-task/src/state/messageability.ts:messageability`, lines 10-13, classifies `completed/resident` as `\"revive\"`.\n\n5. `packages/senpi-task/src/steering/engine.ts:reviveTerminal`\n   - Lines 80-87:\n     - awaits `handle.followUp(message)`;\n     - calls `buildRevived`;\n     - calls `port.store.replace(revived)`;\n     - appends the `revived` event;\n     - invokes `reacquireForRevive`.\n\n6. `packages/senpi-task/src/steering/engine.ts:buildRevived`\n   - Lines 214-224 strips terminal output/error/stats and produces:\n     - `status:\"running\"` at line 220;\n     - `residency_state:\"resident\"`;\n     - incremented `notification.run_epoch` at line 223.\n\n7. Store wrapper chain:\n   - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/engine.ts:composeTaskEngine`\n     - Base store: line 104.\n     - Completion-observing wrapper: line 136.\n     - Mutation-notifying wrapper: lines 143-146.\n     - Manager receives that notifying store at line 161.\n   - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/store-mutation-observer.ts:createMutationNotifyingStore.replace`\n     - Lines 13-15 calls the backing replace first, then synchronously calls `onMutation()`.\n   - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/completion-bridge.ts:createCompletionObservingStore.replace`\n     - Line 35 passes revival replacement directly through; revival is not a terminal notification.\n   - `packages/senpi-task/src/store/record-store.ts:createTaskRecordStore.replace`\n     - Lines 69-72 atomically writes and refreshes the cache.\n\n8. Observer to UI:\n   - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/index.ts:createTaskComponent.register`\n     - Line 87 creates `statusUi`.\n     - Line 88 registers `engine.onStoreMutation(() => statusUi.scheduleSync())`.\n   - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/engine.ts:composeTaskEngine.onStoreMutation`\n     - Lines 143-145 fan mutations out to listeners.\n\n9. `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/status-ui.ts:createTaskStatusUi.scheduleSync`\n   - Lines 132-143 immediately calls `refreshCachedRecords`, caching the post-replace running record before the debounced render.\n   - `refreshCachedRecords`, lines 91-98, requires a captured UI and TUI mode, then calls `scopedRecords`.\n   - `scopedRecords`, lines 215-219, returns nothing without a session ID and otherwise requests parent-session scope.\n   - `TaskManagerImpl.list`, `manager.ts` lines 357-359, filters with `manager-helpers.ts:inSession`, lines 81-82.\n\n10. `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/status-ui.ts:renderCachedRecords`\n    - Lines 113-115 filters records through `manager.wasBackground`.\n    - Because the real manager defines that method, line 120 calls `backgroundWidgetRows`.\n    - `packages/omo-senpi/src/components/task/status-row-format.ts:backgroundWidgetRows`\n      filters terminal statuses at lines 129-137. A valid revived record is running, so this filter passes.\n    - Empty rows call `setWidget(\"omo-task\", undefined)` at lines 121-124.\n    - Non-empty rows call `setWidget(\"omo-task\", rows, {placement:\"belowEditor\"})` at line 126.\n\n## Why background classification is falsifiable\n\nSource manager ownership:\n\n- `manager.ts` line 262 adds tasks only when `run_in_background === true`.\n- `promoteToBackground`, lines 399-402, is the other promotion path.\n- `wasBackground`, line 405, reads the private background set.\n- Neither `task_send` nor revival promotes a foreground task.\n\nTherefore:\n\n> If the revived record is `running/resident`, has the incremented epoch, belongs to the active session, and `manager.wasBackground(taskId)` is false, its absent row is explained by the status-UI filter.\n\nIf `wasBackground` is true, this diagnosis is disproven.\n\n## Evidence needed to distinguish it\n\nCapture these facts from the same process/render:\n\n1. `task_send` result is `{kind:\"revived\"}`.\n2. Post-send record is `status:\"running\"`, `residency_state:\"resident\"`, with incremented `run_epoch`.\n3. Record `parent_session_id` or `root_session_id` equals the captured runtime session ID.\n4. Runtime has a UI and `mode` is undefined or `\"tui\"`.\n5. `manager.wasBackground(taskId)`:\n   - `false` confirms this suppression;\n   - `true` disproves it and shifts attention to observer/debounce/setWidget execution.\n6. Last widget call:\n   - `undefined` with `wasBackground:false` is the expected projection;\n   - rows missing despite `wasBackground:true` requires separate observer/render evidence.\n\nAn executable source probe produced:\n\n```json\n{\"background\":false,\"lastWidget\":{}}\n{\"background\":true,\"lastWidget\":{\"content\":[\"⠇ st_probe · agent:? · model:probe/model · running · 2s\"],\"placement\":\"belowEditor\"}}\n```\n\n## Generated runtime boundary\n\nThe installed plugin does not execute the TypeScript component directly:\n\n- `plugin/extensions/omo.js` line 2354 dynamically imports `#omo-task-runtime`.\n- `plugin/package.json` line 8 maps that specifier to `extensions/omo-task.js`.\n\nThe generated bundle preserves the same projection:\n\n- `omo-task.js:_P/g/O/Pq` line 980: send resolution, revival, record replacement.\n- `omo-task.js:N2.sendToTask/N2.wasBackground` line 983: manager delegation and background classification.\n- `omo-task.js:s_/XT` line 1021: `runTaskSend` and tool factory.\n- `omo-task.js:RW/UW/bU` line 1032: scoped records, background filter, active filter, and both `setWidget` calls.\n- `omo-task.js:O9/P9/ER` line 1063: mutation store, engine composition, and component registration.\n\nBoundary difference: generated `N2.wasBackground` reads persisted `TaskRecord.notify_on_terminal`; current source uses an in-memory `#background` set. Generated `Pq` spreads that marker through revival, so an originally background generated-runtime task should remain visible.\n\nArtifact parity cannot be established from this checkout: `build-extension.mjs` lines 47-48 and 99 expect `src/extension/omo-task.ts`, but that entry is absent. The generated artifact can still be inspected directly, and its relevant suppression predicate matches source.\n\n## Verification\n\nRan the six relevant suites together:\n\n```text\n54 pass, 0 fail, 171 assertions\n```\n\nThey cover same-instance revival for in-process and RPC children, manager epoch mutation, concurrency reacquisition, background rendering, terminal filtering, debounce, and `setWidget`. Notably, no existing status test covers the full revive → mutation observer → real-manager foreground filter path; the live TUI revival scenario uses `run_in_background:true` (`task-tui-scenarios.mjs` lines 9-21). No files were edited.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":337321,"turns":20,"tool_calls":76,"output_tokens":15235,"total_tokens":2690476,"generation_ms":297262,"tokens_per_second":51,"cost_usd":2.672679,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9866184293159994,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9270671315219825}}