{"task_id":"st_01a0038a","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T03:48:57.610Z","updated_at":"2026-08-17T06:21:00.255Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"task26-provenance-auditor","task_summary":"Verify Task26 candidate and review receipt provenance offline","description":"Audit candidate provenance","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: independently verify whether Task26 currently has one immutable authoritative candidate to which all required review lanes can bind. Scope: read-only evidence repository /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26 and execution repo /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. Start from the handoff's candidate-seal hold and latest chronological receipts. Recompute/check only offline hashes and manifests using existing verifier scripts where safe; do not alter product/profile/evidence, create new candidate artifacts, start services, access Telegram/provider, or use commit/reset/stash/clean. Observable stop condition: return confirmed/false-positive/needs-fix verdict with exact candidate digest(s), drift evidence, missing reviewer receipts, commands executed, and the smallest offline next action that preserves historical receipts.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n\n<Selection_Gate>\nBEFORE selecting this category, VERIFY ALL conditions:\n1. Task does NOT fit: quick (trivial), visual-engineering (UI), ultrabrain (deep logic), artistry (creative), writing (docs)\n2. Task requires substantial effort across multiple systems/modules\n3. Changes have broad impact or require careful coordination\n4. NOT just \"complex\" - must be genuinely unclassifiable AND high-effort\n\nIf task fits ANY other category, DO NOT select unspecified-high.\nIf task is unclassifiable but moderate-effort, use unspecified-low instead.\n</Selection_Gate>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a clarification request - the prior next-action wording was wrong under the active handoff.\n\nIt **cannot** be both offline and non-mutating. The recorded preparation is local/non-service, but it is a **profile mutation**:\n\n- Exact API: `RoomBootstrapStore.prepare_rehearsal_customer_invite`\n- Target: `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-customer-bootstrap-v1/ledger.json`\n- Proof: the receipt records its SHA changing `b5f0be...cefb28a` -> `efc1cc...e2ce5d7a`, with `prepare_invocations: 1`.\n- It did not activate a customer, deliver, start a service, or send/click Telegram; that does not make it non-mutating.\n\nThe expired-window cleanup is also a profile mutation:\n\n- Exact API: `RoomBootstrapStore.expire_unbound`\n- Same target ledger, now at `76ec1618...d9c83e803`.\n- Both prepared sessions are `EXPIRED`; no live invite or owner review exists.\n\nNo executable command for preparation/reconciliation is recorded in the authoritative receipts, only those APIs. Inventing one would not be evidence-based. The recorded controller `arm` command is not applicable: the repair receipt expressly forbids reseal, re-arm, or relaunch until the durable owner-review prerequisite exists.\n\n| Substep | Classification | Allowed under active handoff? |\n|---|---|---|\n| Inspect receipts/hashes | evidence-only | Yes |\n| Repair controller/test source | source-only | Not needed now; already caused 5e6f invalidation |\n| Create successor seal | evidence-only | No: repair receipt puts preparation/reconciliation before reseal |\n| `prepare_rehearsal_customer_invite` | profile mutation | No |\n| Reconcile to committed `owner_review` | profile mutation | No |\n| `expire_unbound` | profile mutation | Already completed; do not repeat |\n| Controller arm or `systemctl` operations | service action | No |\n| Create/serve a fresh link | profile mutation, then service action | No |\n| Authorize a fresh invite window | human authorization | Not presently actionable |\n| Open link / press Start | Telegram action and human authorization | No |\n\nThe auditor's “authorize one fresh canonical invite window” is conditional future-state guidance, not authority to override the active handoff. With profile mutation prohibited and both windows expired, the only allowed next action is to preserve the receipts and remain on hold; Task26 cannot advance to a new authoritative candidate.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":69647,"turns":2,"tool_calls":4,"output_tokens":3672,"total_tokens":204447,"generation_ms":68901,"tokens_per_second":53,"cost_usd":0.104622,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9339729174106497,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9435437678993899}}