{"task_id":"st_01a0038c","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T03:50:21.201Z","updated_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:59.056Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task26-code-quality-review","task_summary":"Audit sealed candidate code quality and maintainability gates","description":"Review candidate code quality","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Review lane: code quality and maintainability for sealed Task26 candidate 5e6f2f2a01321ac89c2950e511e7346d23070c51146c14c22c04db54034b28f1, status SHA ca1ce2705c0c406f30461e5f05e8d09468dee33348960c3650b6b98758895478. Inspect the manifest's source/test closure, relevant full files and diffs, Task20/Gate20 output, strict type delta evidence, Ruff/compile/build evidence, tests for determinism and behavior, and prior code-quality failures to prove closure. Run only offline/read-only checks under network denial and cache-disabled isolation; do not edit product/tests/profile/runtime or create build artifacts outside disposable temp. Write one unique append-only receipt at /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-code-quality-final-5e6f2f2a.redacted.json. Missing/inconclusive is FAIL. Return PASS/FAIL, severity-ranked findings, exact commands/results/hashes, candidate-drift check, rejected scope, cleanup and non-touch evidence.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a completed authority-lineage audit - report the fail-closed result and receipt.\n\n**FAIL / NO-GO**\n\nCritical finding: post-launch evidence proves candidate `5e6f...b28f1` starts without a recoverable owner review. The repair receipt explicitly invalidates it.\n\nAdditional findings:\n- High: 2/375 sealed closure leaves drifted: controller and its regression test.\n- High: candidate-bound strict type/Ruff/compile closure is incomplete.\n- Moderate: Gate20 predates the adverse runtime discovery.\n- Moderate: repair receipt contains a sealed-controller hash typo.\n\nBroad tests stopped after decisive invalidation. No product, test, profile, runtime, Git, network, or build mutations were made.\n\nReceipt:\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-code-quality-final-5e6f2f2a.redacted.json`\n\nSHA-256: `5dc650507ceed203dbf883fa89dc21914953917a6c09fe63a08d90183029086b`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":236064,"turns":11,"tool_calls":37,"output_tokens":11628,"total_tokens":1077465,"generation_ms":230446,"tokens_per_second":50,"cost_usd":1.586121,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9736678196106495,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8531435857452875}}