{"task_id":"st_01a003ea","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T05:33:02.286Z","updated_at":"2026-08-17T08:24:36.141Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"task26-successor-gate20","task_summary":"Run Gate20 full gateway suite against the sealed successor candidate","description":"Run successor full gateway gate","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Execute Task26 Gate20 against immutable successor full digest 3b42723d0e8256351defdf31958f9ade795f80a7be456529740949c87875d527. Verify candidate and source/status before and after. Run the canonical full gateway suite from /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent exactly once with PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1, -B, pytest -q -p no:cacheprovider tests/gateway, network denied where compatible, and disposable cache/home. Confirm source-wheel parity and repaired controller/test pins. Do not edit source/tests/profile/archive/candidate, start live services, access Telegram/provider, mutate customers, or perform Git mutations. Write append-only successor Gate20 receipt under .omo/evidence/task26 with command, exit code, pass/skip/warning counts, duration, stdout/stderr hashes, candidate pins, drift checks, cleanup, and PASS/FAIL. Any candidate-caused failure must be reported, not suppressed; pre-existing unrelated failures must be isolated.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as Gate20 retry completion - report the canonical direct-host result and receipt.\n\n**Gate20 retry: FAIL**\n\n- Exact canonical invocation count: 1\n- Results: `8137 passed, 1 failed, 59 skipped, 258 warnings`\n- Exit code: `1`\n- Failure: `test_get_running_pid_rejects_live_non_gateway_pid`\n  - `get_running_pid()` deletes an untrusted legacy numeric PID file.\n  - The bound test contract requires preserving it.\n  - Candidate-bound source/test contract mismatch; not suppressed or rerun.\n- Candidate, source closure, status, source-wheel parity, and repaired pins remained unchanged.\n- Service remained inactive; no external, profile, customer, or Git actions.\n- Pytest cache unchanged; temporary test directory removed.\n- An initial preparation wrapper aborted before pytest; canonical invocation count remained zero for that attempt.\n\nRetry receipt:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-gate20-3b42723d0e8256351defdf31958f9ade795f80a7be456529740949c87875d527-retry-receipt.json`\n\nSHA-256: `ecad63a8af05067e7469216599a6f31f3545c77181ef713ce3a2c08155a42c2b`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1278875,"turns":9,"tool_calls":15,"output_tokens":7911,"total_tokens":1381363,"generation_ms":170320,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":1.773134,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9821459611134563,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8626206085105268}}