{"task_id":"st_01a00432","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T06:53:21.426Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T01:00:41.297Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"task26-final-objective-653c","task_summary":"Verify all Task26 objectives and constraints on candidate 653c","description":"Review final objective coverage","category":"unspecified-high","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"GPT-5.6 Terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final Task26 objective/constraint review for immutable candidate 653cc2f0b47873e95f985ea3eb32b8f2c044d6de64cd9e8fe37ebcec67c7a723. Read active plan/handoff, candidate manifest/archive binding/supersession, Gates18-20 PASS receipts, Task22-25 indexes/archive, PID finding/fix evidence, and current clean runtime. Map every objective, invariant, minimum-operation rule, no-shortcut condition, owner-only/trainer-free scope, cleanup, and release constraint to exact candidate-bound or explicitly historical evidence. Do not retarget historical execution. Read-only except one unique append-only receipt .omo/evidence/task26/task26-objective-final-653cc2f0.redacted.json. No source/profile/runtime/archive/service/network/Telegram/provider/Git actions. Missing/inconclusive is FAIL. Return PASS/FAIL, exact hashes/paths, findings, candidate drift, cleanup/non-touch.\n\n\nYou are working on tasks that don't fit specific categories but require substantial effort.\n\n\nBEFORE selecting this category, VERIFY ALL conditions:\n1. Task does NOT fit: quick (trivial), visual-engineering (UI), ultrabrain (deep logic), artistry (creative), writing (docs)\n2. Task requires substantial effort across multiple systems/modules\n3. Changes have broad impact or require careful coordination\n4. NOT just \"complex\" - must be genuinely unclassifiable AND high-effort\n\nIf task fits ANY other category, DO NOT select unspecified-high.\nIf task is unclassifiable but moderate-effort, use unspecified-low instead.\n\n"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only remediation-boundary interpretation - I compared the exact-candidate, real-surface, and historical-evidence rules.\n\n**No.** A candidate-bound disposable replay through production handlers is valuable compatibility/regression proof, but it cannot close both blockers for a release verdict.\n\n- **What it can prove:** exact-candidate handler behavior against authenticated historical inputs, source/wheel parity, fail-closed paths, and that no archive was restored or retargeted. This is compatibility proof.\n- **What it cannot prove:** a new real Telegram normal-path execution on the exact candidate. It is still a replay, not the customer/owner Telegram interaction required by the plan.\n\nPlan requirements are explicit:\n\n- `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md:27-29` requires the lifecycle to work through **real Telegram surfaces** without listeners, direct JSON mutation, ledger deletion, service replay, or forced publication.\n- `:114-115` invariant 10 requires production-release evidence from the **exact immutable candidate being reviewed**.\n- `:710-735` requires Task22 to be driven through real Telegram and declares raw listener, service replay, direct mutation, or forced republication a rehearsal failure.\n- `:749-770` requires the real staff Telegram card, explicit send, and observation of the customer DM; `:766` says every action uses Telegram, not direct service calls.\n- `:1093-1103` requires both no normal-path recovery shortcut and intended-DM delivery observation; anything less is **NO-GO**.\n\nThe handoff reinforces rather than waives this:\n\n- `...handoff.md:14-15`: Task23-25 historical receipts do **not** establish readiness for a later source tree.\n- `:80-88`: the archive must be consumed as historical evidence and must not be restored or retargeted; this avoids repeating onboarding solely to prove an already-completed binding.\n- `:142-146`: historical artifacts cannot retroactively claim execution on a future digest; incomplete clean-path/real-surface evidence requires rerun or explicit closure.\n- `:152-162`: no live rehearsal is currently authorized; future validation is offline/disposable unless explicitly extended.\n\nTherefore, under the current governing artifacts:\n\n1. A disposable production-handler replay may close a **candidate compatibility** gap without retargeting history.\n2. It does **not** close invariant 10 or the final no-shortcut/real-surface release condition.\n3. A plan-compliant release needs an exact-candidate live synthetic customer/owner Telegram rehearsal with actual intended-DM delivery - unless the governing plan is explicitly amended to waive or redefine those acceptance criteria.\n4. That live work is currently prohibited; it would require fresh explicit authorization. It need not mean restoring the archive, creating a fourth bootstrap invite, or redoing onboarding merely to re-prove the archived customer binding.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":71093,"turns":3,"tool_calls":7,"output_tokens":3527,"total_tokens":525939,"generation_ms":69613,"tokens_per_second":51,"cost_usd":0.1646264,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9808208712065886,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9810494399056683}}