{"task_id":"st_01a004c8","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T09:37:18.256Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T05:38:14.751Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task26-live-evidence-equivalence-adjudication","task_summary":"Decide whether byte parity can satisfy exact-candidate live evidence","description":"Adjudicate live evidence transfer","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only adjudication: can Task26 objective and F4 pass under the existing unamended dualcoach-production-readiness plan by combining completed Tasks22-25 live Telegram evidence with cryptographic product parity to current candidate 2e0894eac92bc396cc4723bf1f18ebc653b95018dd41574df435941c235da925, or is a new live rehearsal / explicit plan amendment mandatory? Read the full plan, Golden Path/Recovery Runbook, Task22-25 evidence, objective FAIL receipt, candidate 2e manifest/checkpoint/parity records, and ledger. Distinguish candidate full/envelope/core/product wheel identity and determine the exact candidate used in Tasks22-25 plus every executable source delta from that live candidate through 653 to 2e. Judge plan language literally: Specification26 reviewers receive live evidence; Task26 says findings fixed to candidate; final wave says exact fixed candidate; F4 asks intended surfaces and one real happy path; invariant/no-shortcut requirements. Do not assume 'exact candidate live execution' if not actually stated; do not weaken requirements silently. Evaluate whether byte identity or non-behavioral delta is a valid evidence transfer under existing semantics, and whether Task22's global_no_recovery_shortcut_criterion:not_claimed can be closed from other receipts. Return one decisive outcome: PASS_WITHOUT_AMENDMENT, AMENDMENT_REQUIRED, or NEW_LIVE_REQUIRED, with quoted clauses/file references, candidate lineage/delta table, residual risk, and exact minimal next action. No writes, source/profile/runtime/network/Telegram/Git actions.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only release-evidence adjudication - I will apply the plan literally, trace candidate/product lineage, and return one binding outcome.\n\n# Decision: `NEW_LIVE_REQUIRED`\n\n**Task26’s objective and F4 cannot PASS for candidate `2e0894…` by transferring Tasks22–25 evidence. Under the unamended plan, one new complete live Telegram rehearsal against the exact fixed candidate is mandatory.**\n\nAn amendment is an alternative governance choice, but it would change or waive the present standard; it would not constitute PASS under the unamended plan. No files, services, profiles, or external systems were modified.\n\n## Controlling clauses\n\n1. The objective requires **one reproducible release candidate** completing the entire lifecycle through real Telegram surfaces without the listed shortcuts (`dualcoach-production-readiness.md:24-38`).\n2. Invariant 10 requires production evidence from **“the exact immutable candidate being reviewed”** (`:114-115`).\n3. Evidence reuse is allowed only when **its exact candidate and covered behavior remain unchanged**; affected gates are rerun after a digest change (`:221-223`).\n4. Task26 reviewers must receive the candidate digest and live rehearsal evidence; missing or inconclusive lanes fail, and findings require affected gates to be rerun (`:802-814`).\n5. Every final verifier judges the **exact fixed candidate** (`:1069-1071`).\n6. F4 requires one real happy path over the intended customer and owner/operator Telegram surfaces, with exactly one delivery after explicit send (`:1083-1085`).\n7. Completion additionally requires that **no normal-path step used a recovery shortcut**; anything less remains NO-GO (`:1091-1102`).\n\nThese clauses independently block silent retargeting.\n\n## Identity layers\n\n| Identity layer | Meaning | `653cc2…` | Current `2e0894…` |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Full candidate | Authoritative release-review identity calculated from the candidate manifest | `653cc2f0…c7a723` | `2e0894ea…da925` |\n| Core candidate | Canonical manifest-core hash; despite its name, it includes evidence/archive bindings, not just product code | `a03f84f7…f5ef` | `a8d099d5…e88e` |\n| Envelope | Immutable filesystem bundle containing wheel, bindings, history, status and verifier | Manifest `23b72148…ca26` | Manifest `7b6d0d6e…52d`; 43 files; tree `d5213d1b…c75b4` |\n| Executable closure | Product/source-equivalence evidence | 2,374 entries, `7d7fb32d…986dd` | Identical |\n| Product wheel | Deployable product bytes | `af4a9d0a…f141b` | Byte-identical `af4a9d0a…f141b` |\n\nTherefore:\n\n- `653cc2…` and `2e0894…` are **product-equivalent**, but not the same full/core/envelope candidate.\n- The existing supersession receipt permits only **source-bound evidence transfer** between them.\n- It explicitly records `historical_execution_retargeted_to_successor: false`.\n- `2e0894…` is sealed only as `NOT_TASK26_PASS`; its effective state says `task26_pass: false`.\n\nMost importantly, product parity exists only between `653cc2…` and `2e0894…`. Neither candidate was exercised through Tasks22–25 live.\n\n## Live lineage\n\n| Phase | Identity actually evidenced | Live status and consequence |\n|---|---|---|\n| Task22 | Full/code candidate `3ce5b956…`; manifest `e456cfc6…`; wheel `f592abef…` | Authenticated Telegram terminal evidence, but Task22 expressly limits PASS to its own acceptance. |\n| Task23 expiry stage | Candidate `70da304a…`; wheel `fbcef69d…` | Superseded Task22 product. |\n| Task23 successful generation | Hardened wheel `3d1bc0a7…` plus five source hashes | The successful event occurred after the `70da…` seal; no complete immutable full-candidate digest covers that execution. A separately authorized one-use recovery child created the draft. |\n| Task24 live | Repository/`.venv` service; deployed `telegram.py` pin `774df448…` | No complete immutable candidate digest or wheel is bound to the live sequence. Normal Regenerate produced an unparented draft and was blocked. |\n| Task24 recovery | Existing authenticated Edit path | Completed forward via recovery. The Regenerate repair wheel `231015fa…` was explicitly **not deployed**. |\n| Task25 | Cleanup plus `rehearsal_reset.py` pin `7dcb0b1e…` | No complete executable candidate digest. |\n| Task24/25 archive | `9b102fde…` | Hash of control files, historical receipts and four selected gateway files. It is an archive/evidence-scope digest, not proof that a full product candidate ran live. |\n| Task26 launch | `5e6f2f2a…`; wheel `6a3f5f04…` | Service connected, but no recoverable owner-review prerequisite existed; candidate invalidated. Not a happy path. |\n| Repaired successor | `3b42723d…`; wheel `36719371…` | Controller repaired; no complete live rehearsal. |\n| PID successor | `653cc2f0…`; wheel `af4a9d0a…` | Task26 objective lane returned `FAIL/NO-GO`; Tasks22–25 classified historical-only. |\n| Current | `2e0894ea…`; same `af4a9d0a…` wheel | Envelope-only successor; no historical live execution retargeted and no Task26 PASS. |\n\nThere is consequently **no “live candidate used in Tasks22–25” as a single immutable identity**.\n\n## Executable deltas\n\nAn exhaustive live-candidate-to-current delta chain cannot be produced because Tasks23–25 did not seal the complete execution closure actually used. That missing lineage is itself fatal to transfer. The authenticated deltas are:\n\n| Boundary | Executable delta |\n|---|---|\n| Task22 → Task23 | Wheel changed `f592abef… → fbcef69d… → 3d1bc0a7…`; onboarding runtime, authority, callbacks, Telegram routing/bootstrap and generation/coaching sources changed. |\n| Task23 successful pins → current | `nutrition_coaching.py` `3f8943b5… → 07f868ad…`; `nutrition_coaching_proposal.py` `d36c39e2… → 055d5798…`; `telegram.py` `6a393a58… → b41060de…`. Two other pinned judgment files remain equal. |\n| Task24 live → current | Deployed `telegram.py` `774df448… → b41060de…`. |\n| Task24 failed-Regenerate repair → current | Undeployed `nutrition_coaching.py` `2d10de01… → 07f868ad…`; later changes therefore occurred after the repair receipt. |\n| Task24/25 archive snapshot → current | `nutrition_coaching.py` `8ea601b4… → 07f868ad…`; `telegram.py` `e51d6676… → b41060de…`; `rehearsal_reset.py` `7dcb0b1e…` is absent from the current closure; proposal source remained `055d5798…`. |\n| `5e6f2… → 3b427…` | `dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py` repaired to `b3036345…`; wheel `6a3f5f04… → 36719371…`. |\n| `3b427… → 653cc2…` | Exactly one executable delta: `gateway/status.py`, 60,499 bytes / `7a04d81f…` → 60,653 bytes / `8641bae4…`; wheel `36719371… → af4a9d0a…`. |\n| `653cc2… → 2e0894…` | **Zero product-source deltas**, identical closure and wheel. Only envelope/binding content changed. |\n\nA direct comparison of the Task22 sealed manifest with the current closure finds 24 changed shared non-test paths, including coaching, proposal/validation, check-in, Telegram onboarding/runtime/publication, operator-console, `gateway/status.py`, and `pyproject.toml`. Thus there is no cryptographic product-equivalence bridge from Task22—or the later live executions—to `653cc2…`/`2e0894…`.\n\n## No-recovery-shortcut criterion\n\nThis cannot be closed retroactively:\n\n- Task22 explicitly records `global_no_recovery_shortcut_criterion: not_claimed` and says the plan remains NO-GO until independently satisfied (`dualcoach-task-22.md:8-10`).\n- Task23 says a separately authorized one-use recovery child generated the accepted draft (`dualcoach-task-23.md:9-10`).\n- Task24’s normal Regenerate failed; completion used the Edit recovery path while the Regenerate repair remained undeployed (`dualcoach-task-24-regenerate-lineage-repair.json:55-62`).\n\nThis does not necessarily prove a prohibited mutation occurred. It proves the required absence-of-shortcut fact is missing and that the recorded lifecycle was segmented by recovery. Under Task26’s fail-closed rule, later automated tests, cleanup, or product parity cannot convert that run into an uninterrupted no-recovery happy path.\n\n## Why `653cc2… → 2e0894…` parity is insufficient\n\nEven the broadest reasonable interpretation fails:\n\n- If “exact candidate” means full/core identity, `653cc2…` and `2e0894…` differ.\n- If it means product wheel plus closure, those two are equivalent—but neither has Tasks22–25 live evidence.\n- Earlier live candidates are not product-equivalent to `af4a9d0a…`.\n- The current transfer record expressly limits reuse to source-bound evidence and disclaims historical execution retargeting.\n- The current Golden Path and Recovery Runbook still name candidate `19ed0e92…`, not `2e0894…`; they must be re-bound before a current-candidate rehearsal.\n\n## Options\n\n1. **New exact-candidate rehearsal — required under the current plan.**  \n   Preserves every objective and completion clause.\n\n2. **Amend the plan.**  \n   To avoid a new rehearsal, the amendment would need to:\n   - redefine candidate identity around product equivalence;\n   - authorize live-evidence transfer across full/core/envelope changes and intervening source deltas;\n   - permit segmented task evidence to count as one happy path; and\n   - redefine or waive the no-recovery-shortcut criterion.\n\n   A narrow amendment allowing byte-identical transfer from `653cc2…` to `2e0894…` is insufficient because no live rehearsal exists on `653cc2…`.\n\n3. **Transfer without amendment.**  \n   Invalid: it conflicts with the plan, the Task26 objective FAIL receipt, and the candidates’ own anti-retargeting declarations.\n\n## Minimal next action\n\nRe-bind the unchanged Golden Path and Recovery Runbook to `2e0894…`, then run one isolated complete Tasks22–25 lifecycle using wheel `af4a9d0a…`/closure `7d7fb32d…`:\n\n- prove those exact bytes are loaded;\n- use only the intended customer DM and owner/operator Telegram surfaces;\n- use no recovery path;\n- observe exactly one delivery after explicit send;\n- complete truthful disable/cleanup;\n- bind all receipts externally to full digest `2e0894…`; and\n- rerun the affected Task26 objective, hands-on/provenance lanes and F4.\n\nIf that rehearsal exposes a product defect, reseal a new candidate digest and rerun the affected gates against that successor.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":697777,"turns":37,"tool_calls":126,"output_tokens":30853,"total_tokens":4076012,"generation_ms":615427,"tokens_per_second":50,"cost_usd":4.574104999999999,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9306396526772793,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9106786655357676}}