{"task_id":"st_01a0054d","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T12:02:13.192Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T05:23:18.815Z","notification":{"run_epoch":4,"notified_epoch":4},"name":"task26-reset-controller-seal","task_summary":"Build a tested reset controller for the current bootstrap layout","description":"Seal archive-first reset controller","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Build and independently validate an evidence-scoped, permission-sealed archive-first profile reset controller compatible with current candidate 2e0894ea... and the current live profile layout, without executing it on live state. Start test-first against disposable byte-for-byte fixtures of the current empty profile including the three terminal bootstrap sessions. Requirements: descriptor-safe/O_NOFOLLOW, regular single-link private files, stable pre/post fstat, fail on unknown roots/schemas, archive every current lifecycle authority including customer-bootstrap ledger before clearing, preserve and hash prior archives, never restore/prepopulate, clear only approved profile scopes, other-profile non-touch, atomic writes, rollback before commit on any mismatch, deterministic receipt/archive manifest, dry-run/verify/execute modes, exact-candidate/wheel/plan/approval pins, and post-reset empty-baseline verifier. Preserve historical evidence and avoid raw Telegram/provider/service actions. Create controller, tests/fixtures, schema contract, permission receipt and independent verification receipt under .omo/evidence/task26 in private paths; do not modify product source/tests/candidate/live profile/runtime/archive/service/network/Git. Run deterministic disposable tests once, diagnostics, dry-run against live read-only if safe. Return PASS/FAIL, paths/hashes/modes, tests, covered scopes/schemas, exact execute command and rollback boundaries; READY_FOR_LIVE_RESET only if current bootstrap ledger is covered and all safety gates pass.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as completed live baseline repair - report the sealed execution and restart readiness.\n\n# READY_FOR_GATEWAY_RESTART\n\nThe sealed `complete-baseline` command executed exactly once.\n\n- Created `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/customers` as mode `0700`.\n- Created canonical empty `registry.json` as mode `0600`, single-link, owner-held.\n- Registry SHA-256: `9eb1b5ae0e511dbafbed6b683ec7baa2ffb15518637d8ad63200567c4009a518`\n- Customers: `0`\n- No archive restore, prepopulation, or customer row occurred.\n\nThe prepared invite remains byte-identical, unclaimed, and PREPARED:\n\n- Session: `cb_v4olwxbpSQatMtVLR4QLmw`\n- Ledger SHA-256: `951e8a6b33bc34454f326161acf23c386dc9e5d7fcea3fb28b7817114f196f14`\n- Expiry: `2026-08-15T15:51:59.410379+00:00`\n\nThe committed reset archive remains unchanged:\n\n- Manifest: `7ef0eb8f4b27ab311a11909c25167df9493348d996319d009eec36a0ebf6f146`\n- Receipt: `611ca27fd680c27cc5d9ac50b66f3f1700073b4cabac0e50247d86c2874582cb`\n- Evidence: `d2879b128573a9d75a55958d2fa3e1a24be1636f0a7a20affe8f2ef9b94dfd33`\n\nVerification:\n\n- Tests: `11 passed`\n- Ruff: PASS\n- Compile: PASS\n- LSP errors: `0`\n- Independent pre/post verification: PASS\n- `_configured_nutrition_registry`: PASS\n- `load_committed_customer_registry`: PASS with zero customers\n- Service remains `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`\n- Network/provider/Telegram calls: `0`\n\nEvidence root:\n\n```text\n.omo/evidence/task26/reset-controller-st_01a0054d/reset-baseline-completion-v1\n```\n\nReadiness receipt SHA-256:\n\n```text\n16497e3bb42dd97c66caabc4abd57aa692f32951f0c0d012d754d9988b9cde6a\n```","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":600066,"turns":51,"tool_calls":75,"output_tokens":23848,"total_tokens":3903234,"generation_ms":518962,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":4.205554000000002,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.964653856933761,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9111874920412664}}