{"task_id":"st_01a0056a","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T12:33:56.933Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T07:13:29.398Z","notification":{"run_epoch":4,"notified_epoch":4},"name":"task26-invite-harness-seal","task_summary":"Build a candidate-bound harness enforcing one invite and one claim","description":"Seal one-invite preparation harness","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Build and independently validate an evidence-scoped, permission-sealed invite preparation/observation harness for the authorized Task26 same-actor logical lifecycle. No live invite or Telegram action yet. Bind candidate 2e0894ea..., wheel af4a9d0a..., amended plan 7ace03c6..., runbooks 1f55b8f9.../f4f2d234..., actor 8527916639, and approval receipt. Test-first using disposable current-layout bootstrap ledgers. Requirements: exact one new customer key/session/token, all prior sessions terminal, no existing registry/customer authorities, private-DM actor not owner/staff, subscribe exact filesystem/state event before prepare/claim, bounded event-driven timeout (no sleeps/poll loops), fail on duplicate/nonterminal/open recovery, never reveal raw token except one private 0600 handoff artifact, deterministic token/SID hash receipt, atomic canonical invite preparation through shipped candidate API only, loaded-byte proof, one accepted Start/claim maximum, no raw getUpdates/drop updates/cursor edits, no archive restore/direct JSON mutation/replay/forced publication, rollback only before token publication, expiry/cleanup command and receipts. Provide dry-run/verify/prepare/observe modes or separate sealed tools, tests, permission seal, exact commands and redacted receipts. Run tests/diagnostics and a live read-only dry-run only. Do not create live invite, start service, mutate profile, call Telegram/provider/network, or Git. Return PASS/FAIL, paths/hashes/modes, test results, exact prerequisites and READY_FOR_ONE_INVITE only if clean.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as filename lookup - returning the five exact relative filenames.\n\nverification-receipt-v3.redacted.json\nhashes-v3.json\ntask26-live-2e-r2-dry-run.redacted.json\ntask26-live-2e-r2-verify.redacted.json\nindependent_verify_v3.py","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":5898,"turns":1,"tool_calls":0,"output_tokens":219,"total_tokens":58115,"generation_ms":5567,"tokens_per_second":39,"cost_usd":0.044913999999999996,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9639353323200222,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9639353323200222}}