{"task_id":"st_01a0056e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T12:36:02.496Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T07:50:15.143Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"provider-debug-receipt-delta","task_summary":"Classify authorized receipt writes and partial provider evidence","description":"Classify provider receipt mutation","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Investigate H4 and partial-runtime evidence read-only. Identify exact files created/changed by the failed provider readiness command under dualcoachtest, hash/mode them, compare the receipt's pre/post profile snapshot algorithm, and determine whether result=profile_mutated is a checker contract bug or expected because receipt-dir was inside the snapshot. Verify no model request occurred (request_attempts null/billable false) and no other profile/runtime/service/Telegram state changed. Propose the minimal safe candidate-bound probe receipt contract that permits only declared receipt/index writes. Do not modify/delete anything or expose credentials.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only H4 forensic report - I traced the checker, reconstructed its snapshot scope, inventoried the probe’s writes, and defined a minimal candidate-bound receipt contract.\n\n## Finding\n\n**H4 is refuted.** `result=profile_mutated` was not caused by the receipt directory being inside the snapshot.\n\nThe failed command omitted profile binding:\n\n```text\nPYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 .../dualcoach_admin provider-auth check \\\n  --json \\\n  --receipt-dir .../profiles/dualcoachtest/data/dualcoach-provider-auth \\\n  --allow-billable-active-probe\n```\n\n`--receipt-dir` controls only receipt output; it does not select the Hermes profile. Consequently, `get_hermes_home()` resolved the default `/home/cube/.hermes` root.\n\nThe snapshot algorithm hashes exactly seven declared paths under that root, including `auth.json`, but excluding the receipt directory. It requires existing files to be regular, non-symlinked, mode `0600`, and hashes canonical JSON records containing path, byte count, and SHA-256.\n\nThe probe’s hashes were:\n\n- Pre: `a52417e5c6f2ecac51ba1eb9207d7849c58a0026eced14da826230d4b1204d14`\n- Post: `8e89b79a57feac69f0e90f8c8e40e9d77f1077331d66e231b6130e64cec6dd98`\n\nRecomputing the algorithm over `/home/cube/.hermes` currently produces the exact post hash. The actual `dualcoachtest` snapshot currently produces a different hash, `7d163cb0...`, confirming it was not the snapshotted root.\n\n## Exact probe filesystem effects\n\nThe command interval contains exactly these three file effects:\n\n| Operation | Path | Mode | Size | Current SHA-256 |\n|---|---|---:|---:|---|\n| Changed | `/home/cube/.hermes/auth.json` | `0600` | 4610 | `7051b1c2a2cf278d12002cf73308013a15e8e7efcb8cb73862ab794f8bbfd90d` |\n| Created | `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/dualcoach-provider-auth/receipts/20260815T123448Z-63e65f3106c342be975ca1c4ea67a2f1.json` | `0600` | 1329 | `5b71f2b5b93b789e446e2b249ecac2adfed7b9428b54b585eb707dfdd19dec18` |\n| Replaced | `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/dualcoach-provider-auth/index.json` | `0600` | 297 | `0449bcbc720ba134a41ca9584ef0f5a2fc6b84766e4b24acdb0e09db802cddd0` |\n\nThe reconstructed pre-probe index was also 297 bytes, expected mode `0600`, SHA-256:\n\n```text\nb65af48f39be0e0179e8bf5e606053cdd8b08032862f9655ed0c433ab561c40b\n```\n\nThe global auth mutation was credential-pool bookkeeping: the Codex pool entry ended marked `exhausted` with a command-time status timestamp, after selection attempted to refresh an expiring credential and found no usable runtime token. No credential values were inspected or disclosed.\n\nTherefore, the stronger claim that “no other runtime state changed” is false: **global auth runtime state changed**. The checker correctly detected that protected mutation, although `profile_mutated` masks the underlying `credential_missing` result.\n\n## No model, service, Telegram, or dualcoach operational effect\n\nVerified evidence:\n\n- `request_attempts: null`\n- `billable: false`\n- `prompt_length`, `request_contract`, `usage`, and response fields: null\n- No model generation path was reached.\n- A credential refresh may have been attempted; that is not a model request.\n- Receipt effects report:\n  - delivery actions: `0`\n  - registry mutations: `0`\n  - service actions: `0`\n  - Telegram actions: `0`\n- `hermes-gateway-dualcoachtest.service` remains `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`; it exited hours before this probe.\n- No dualcoach registry, gateway state, outbox ledger, service unit, Telegram ledger, database, workspace, or runtime file changed during the probe interval.\n- The only non-receipt mutation found was `/home/cube/.hermes/auth.json`.\n\nThe required candidate wheel contains the same snapshot implementation byte-for-byte as the invoked module, but the invoked runtime reported candidate digest `f9a461...`, not required candidate `2e0894ea...`; therefore this receipt is not candidate-bound readiness evidence.\n\n## Minimal safe candidate-bound contract\n\n1. **Bind execution**\n   - Verify wheel SHA-256 `af4a9d0...`.\n   - Verify candidate digest `2e0894ea...`.\n   - Require explicit canonical profile root rather than inferring it from `--receipt-dir`.\n\n2. **Declare exact allowed writes before probing**\n   - One newly generated `receipts/<timestamp>-<nonce>.json`.\n   - One atomic replacement of `index.json`.\n   - Temporary files only as same-directory atomic-write intermediates, with no residue.\n   - Directory mtime changes are metadata consequences, not additional authority.\n\n3. **Snapshot all protected state**\n   - Selected profile surfaces.\n   - Global/shared auth store.\n   - Service state and unit identity.\n   - Runtime databases, registries, delivery/outbox and Telegram ledgers.\n   - Capture before resolution and after client close, before receipt publication.\n\n4. **Fail on any undeclared mutation**\n   - Credential refresh or pool-status writes remain forbidden under this strict probe contract.\n   - Preserve the underlying result separately, e.g. `probe_result=credential_missing`, while setting `contract_result=protected_state_mutated`.\n   - Never retry after a model or credential-network attempt.\n\n5. **Validate publication separately**\n   - After writing, compare the final filesystem delta to the two declared outputs.\n   - Record operation, path, mode, size, pre/post hashes, payload digest, candidate digest, and protected-state pre/post hashes.\n   - Require both output files to be regular, non-symlinked `0600` files.\n\nNo files were modified or deleted during this investigation.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":312816,"turns":17,"tool_calls":61,"output_tokens":10910,"total_tokens":2196495,"generation_ms":237361,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":2.2373689999999997,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.983269606740601,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9169023396481949}}