{"task_id":"st_01a007d9","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-15T23:54:42.886Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:02:54.858Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"replacement-claim-adjudicator","task_summary":"Adjudicate the successful replacement claim without replay","description":"Seal exact successful claim evidence","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: append-only adjudicate the already-completed replacement invite claim after the v3 observer failed with 'replacement session binding mismatch' because the candidate advanced directly to AWAITING_CONSENT. Scope is evidence only; no profile/service/network/Telegram/provider mutations and no replay. Inputs: candidate 2e0894ea, wheel af4a9d0a, plan d816dbbd, v3 preparation receipt/session cb_PCczfFXoI4GjvCxLBs1oRA/sid hash 53b4f95b..., preparation ledger c7c53db4..., current bootstrap ledger digest a9b73fcd..., actor 8527916639, role claim message 158, consent card 159, state AWAITING_CONSENT, generation 4, recovery_attempt_generation 1. First determine candidate source's exact atomic claim/consent publication transitions and why v3 observer expected binding mismatched. TDD an append-only one-shot post-claim adjudicator that proves: old EXPIRED session unchanged; replacement identity distinct; exactly one accepted role claim for actor/user/chat 8527916639 topic0; token/session/SID binding correct; customer draft changed only by setting customer_user_id; exact digest relationship; consent publication exactly once/card159; no customer registry row/activation/checkin/generation/delivery yet; no raw token leakage; service exact candidate active. Require evidence of the one event from ledger timestamps and candidate API semantics; UNKNOWN=FAIL. Seal hashes, run tests/Ruff/LSP/compile/independent verify, execute read-only live adjudication. Return PASS_SUCCESSFUL_CLAIM only if normal path is proven. Do not change existing v3 files.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"task26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/verification-receipt-v2.redacted.json  0097f86d07280f354a52f7453f684f7eb2f11fa9cf443dbfb5942d3d3fd9e41d\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/live-adjudication-v2.redacted.json  95d614d0f0f36a94ccf920b58920e3ddff26bb78fd7a2eabcc719ffa0244e76c\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/post_claim_adjudicator_v2.py  1ee766c54ee881c4b64dc55e5484bed4871024e7d513eec1c47bc7f631ed8889\ntask26-post-claim-adjudicator-v2-st_01a007d9/hashes-v2.json  16244181ae1befbdc4719e6d5a0441c34f78f2ed6d7daf07ddc2be9fd8473667","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":14870,"turns":2,"tool_calls":1,"output_tokens":497,"total_tokens":330202,"generation_ms":13651,"tokens_per_second":36,"cost_usd":0.9169390000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9953789782878599,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.50314068637115}}