{"task_id":"st_01a007f3","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-16T00:22:30.015Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:38:32.507Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"bootstrap-activation-review","task_summary":"Map the safest canonical activation seam","description":"Review activation fix architecture","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only independent architecture review. In /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent trace the explicit activate_customer normal path, every production caller, RoomBootstrapStore state transition APIs, transaction/rollback boundaries, and cleanup expectations. Determine the single safest insertion point to transition the exact customer-bound bootstrap session AWAITING_ACTIVATION->ACTIVE without direct ledger edits, duplicate activation, partial commit, or wrong-session ambiguity. Identify existing tests and exact new regression seam. Do not edit or run live profile/service/network. Return file/symbol references, required ordering, failure semantics, and any reason the proposed change would require a larger redesign.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I now have complete evidence. No further searching needed.\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_customer_bootstrap.py - Single source of truth for `RoomBootstrapStore`, `BootstrapState`, the CAS/generation state machine, and the `activate_bound_customer` activation API.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_customer_bootstrap_registration.py - Registration side: drives REGISTERING→AWAITING_CONSENT (via `store.transition` + `bind_private_owner`) and loads profile-local `checkin_cli.customer_admin`.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram.py - Adapter orchestration; `_recover_room_bootstrap_waiting_states()` (line 4945) and `start_after_consent()` caller (line 5929) are the gateway's only AWAITING_ACTIVATION-handling call sites.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime.py - `recover_waiting_session()` (line 177) and `start_after_consent()` (line 97): the AWAITING_ACTIVATION recovery/resume logic. Does NOT advance bootstrap state to ACTIVE.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_authority.py - `_session_for_customer_message()` only returns sessions whose `state is AWAITING_ACTIVATION`; the customer isolation gate.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_collection.py & `..._callback.py` - Ingress/callback gates that require `AWAITING_ACTIVATION`; reject any other bootstrap state.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/tests/gateway/test_telegram_customer_bootstrap.py - Contains the exact regression seam: `test_customer_activation_commits_only_the_exact_bound_session` (line 90) and the idempotency/reject-wrong-identity test (line 100).\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/tests/gateway/test_telegram_room_bootstrap_adversarial.py - Restart/recovery test asserting AWAITING_ACTIVATION survives restart and `recover_waiting_session` is invoked but state is untouched.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/tests/gateway/test_telegram_nutrition_onboarding.py (line 1200) - `recover_waiting_session` just republishes the durable card under AWAITING_ACTIVATION.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/docs/nutrition-coaching/trainer-runbook-ko.md - Specifies the explicit operator cutover (`scripts/nutrition-room-bootstrap activate-cutover`, `--execute`) that is the intended production caller; the CLI itself is NOT in this repo (it lives in the profile's `workspace/checkin_cli`).\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n**The single safest insertion point already exists: `RoomBootstrapStore.activate_bound_customer` at `gateway/platforms/telegram_customer_bootstrap.py:428`.** It is purpose-built for exactly the AWAITING_ACTIVATION→ACTIVE transition with all four required guarantees, and it is the only boundary that satisfies them jointly.\n\n**How it satisfies each constraint:**\n- *No direct ledger edits* — it is the sole authorized store API; `_write_unlocked` (line ~440) is private, atomic (tempfile + fsync + `os.replace` + dir fsync), and digest-checked on read. Callers cannot hand-write `ledger.json`.\n- *No duplicate activation* — idempotent replay: if the session is already `ACTIVE`, it accepts `expected_generation in {generation-1, generation}` and returns the existing object (no generation bump); plus the `active_matches` guard rejects creating a second ACTIVE session for the same `customer_key`.\n- *No partial commit* — single `fcntl.flock(LOCK_EX)` across read+write; generation CAS (raises `GenerationConflict` on stale generation); `_find` requires exactly one matching `session_id` (raises `BootstrapError` on ambiguity). Either the whole update persists or nothing does.\n- *No wrong-session ambiguity* — exact identity match on `customer_key`, `customer_draft.customer_user_id`, `owner_id`, plus a single customer `RoleClaim` with `topic_id==\"0\"`; mismatch raises `BootstrapConflict(\"...activation identity is unavailable\")`. There is no shared-room authority in this design (session `chat_id` is `None`), so the only unambiguous handle is `session_id` + customer claim.\n\n**Why not `transition()` (line 401):** `transition()` *does* allow `AWAITING_ACTIVATION→ACTIVE`, but it is a generic state command with no identity/customer/single-active binding — it would permit activating the wrong session or a second ACTIVE for the same customer. `activate_bound_customer` is the typed, identity-bound completion called for by the runbook rule that the ACTIVE transition \"cannot be done by a generic state-change command.\"\n\n**Every production caller of the explicit path:**\n- `activate_customer`/`disable_customer` live in the profile-local `checkin_cli.customer_admin`, loaded by `TelegramCustomerBootstrapRegistration._profile_modules` from `$PROFILE_ROOT/workspace/checkin_cli` — not in this repo.\n- The operator CLI `scripts/nutrition-room-bootstrap activate-cutover --execute` (documented in the runbook, invoked from the host, not present in `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent`) is the intended caller that retires the current customer via `disable_customer`, activates the target via `activate_customer`, then commits the bootstrap `ACTIVE` transition.\n- Inside this repo there is **zero runtime caller** of `activate_bound_customer` (verified: the only references are the definition and the tests). The gateway's AWAITING_ACTIVATION handlers (`_recover_room_bootstrap_waiting_states` → `recover_waiting_session`; `start_after_consent`) only re-publish cards / resume the service and **never advance the bootstrap state to ACTIVE**.\n\n**Transaction/rollback boundaries:** entire store is file-locked and CAS-generational; every transition writes once atomically and throws (GenerationConflict / BootstrapError / BootstrapConflict) before any write on validation failure, so a failed call leaves the ledger byte-identical (the tests assert this). The `activate_bound_customer` method re-implements this locking inline rather than via `_mutate`, but with the same semantics.\n\n**Failure semantics:** stale generation → `GenerationConflict`; identity mismatch → `BootstrapConflict`; session missing/ambiguous → `BootstrapError`; recovery (`recover_waiting_session`) swallows OSError/TypeError/ValueError and leaves state untouched, returning `False`/logging.\n\n**Cleanup expectations after ACTIVE:** per runbook §대량: exactly one active customer, customers/trainer routes and current consent exact, a committed activation journal/audit receipt, and adaptive `activation`/`delivery` + profile `delivery_enabled` all `false`. `recover_waiting_session` handles the resumable cleanup (republication + owner callback receipt reconciliation).\n\n**Existing tests / new regression seam:**\n- `tests/gateway/test_telegram_customer_bootstrap.py::test_customer_activation_commits_only_the_exact_bound_session` (line ~90) — full walk to AWAITING_ACTIVATION then `activate_bound_customer` → ACTIVE, asserting exact bound session.\n- `...::test_customer_activation_rejects_wrong_identity_and_is_idempotent` (line ~100) — asserts `BootstrapError(\"identity\")` on wrong `customer_user_id`, that ledger is unchanged, and that a replayed call with the pre-commit generation returns the identical committed session.\n- New regression assertions should go in these two tests: (1) exactly one ACTIVE row per `customer_key` after a second candidate tries to activate; (2) a replay passing `generation-1` returns the same object without a further generation increment.\n\n**Would the change require a larger redesign?** Two very different intents:\n- If the goal is \"route the transition through `activate_bound_customer` / confirm the correct seam\" — **no redesign**: the method, state machine, atomicity, and tests already exist.\n- If the goal is to have the **gateway auto-transition** to ACTIVE (e.g., inside `recover_waiting_session` or after `start_after_consent`) — **yes, that is a deliberate architectural barrier**: activation is an explicit operator cutover gated by the g1-g5 checklist, current-customer retirement, and a canonical journal/audit receipt. Auto-advancing from the gateway would bypass that gate and could violate the single-active + activation/delivery-disabled invariants the ledger is designed to protect. The intended seam keeps the gateway at AWAITING_ACTIVATION and lets the typed external CLI complete activation.\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\nIf you intend to add gateway-side activation, the correct move is to call the pre-existing `RoomBootstrapStore.activate_bound_customer()` at the point where you have proven identity + generation (i.e., after `reconcile_committed_consent` returns AWAITING_ACTIVATION in `telegram.py`), and extend `test_telegram_customer_bootstrap.py` with the single-active and idempotent-replay assertions. If the intended change is auto-activation inside `recover_waiting_session`/`start_after_consent`, stop and treat it as a redesign that must preserve the operator cutover gate and single-active invariant. The most reliable path is to keep activation owned by the external `nutrition-room-bootstrap activate-cutover` CLI, which your repo can only reach by adding the missing production caller for `activate_bound_customer` — that insertion, not a new activation implementation, is where the work belongs.\n</next_steps>\n</results>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":313049,"turns":16,"tool_calls":51,"output_tokens":12107,"total_tokens":746852,"generation_ms":222060,"tokens_per_second":55,"cost_usd":0,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9809407109956301,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.49711668674165865}}