{"task_id":"st_01a00a92","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-16T12:34:55.322Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:38:33.635Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"summary-authority-timing","task_summary":"Trace clarification reconciliation and summary authorities","description":"Trace clarification reconciliation and summary authorities","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only investigation in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent and the dualcoachtest live profile. Hypothesis H2: the initial summary mixes stale pre-clarification answers with derived/confirmed baseline because it selects the wrong authority during reconciliation. Inspect only durable redacted state; do not expose raw sensitive content beyond the synthetic values visible in the supplied screenshot. Determine which generation/message built the bad card, which authority fields it used, and whether a timing/projection mismatch explains `미입력` or the bad health warning. Return hashes and file:line source chain. Do not modify anything or call network.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I have a complete, verified source chain and durable-state cross-validation (sibling task `st_01a00a93` independently reproduced the same renderer defects). Compiling the final findings.\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/customers/task26_live_2e_r2_20260815_8527916639/nutrition-onboarding/transient/workflow.json - Durable reconciliation/answers authority that built the card: answers + reconciliation record (advisory, clarifications, current_index=1, resolved), authority_digest 8856ca51...\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/customers/task26_live_2e_r2_20260815_8527916639/nutrition-onboarding/session.json - Durable outbox/session pin: generation 24, message 207, answers_digest ade50836..., body_digest 3230cb1a...\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1/ledger.json - Full publication chain: generations 0-21 collecting, gen 23 msg 205 (activity_category clarification), gen 24 msg 207 (final attestation summary card)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py - `_publish()` splice point: authority→answers→record reuse→summary_ko override (lines 89-90, 96-110, 116, 127-132)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_authority.py - `_authority()`/`_current_authority()`: the authority identity source (lines 88, 152)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py - `render_authoritative_customer_summary()`: the defective renderer that emits `미입력` and the false health warning (lines 59-106; \"검토할 입력이 있습니다\" at 77, `goal`/`training_details` reads at 90/92-94, health at 105)\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/nutrition_onboarding_reconciler.py - The advisory LLM reconciler that produced the (now stale) advisory\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding.py - Domain: `reconciliation_answers`/`record_reconciliation`/`replace_stale_reconciliation`/`revise_reconciliation_answer`/`advance_reconciliation`; where answers and advisory are persisted (lines 414-615), and `revision` reopen path\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py - Persisted reconciliation schema/digest rules; clarifies why a resolving record keeps the old advisory\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_contract.py - Canonical `QUESTION_FIELDS` (goal_type, conditions, pregnancy_breastfeeding, structured dicts) vs the renderer's expected field names (goal, medical_conditions, pregnancy_lactation, flat strings)\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n**Bad card identity (durable hashes)**\n- The initial/attestation summary card was built and published at **generation 24, message 207**, session `cb_PCczfFXoI4GjvCxLBs1oRA`, customer `task26_live_2e_r2_20260815_8527916639` (dualcoachtest).\n- Session record: `answers_digest=ade50836f2d6c4500785cb881fd90038daca3fb9070c4e094e61d1614f27703e`, `body_digest=3230cb1a3c13f8e164c2171148c6e3183cbce0d36289cc647c10634b840d8060` (`session.json`).\n- Reconciliation record used to render it: `digest=6c41af10d0c00742f0984f1e56776db1989cc59662b302daf2dc38b5ad74b294`, state `resolved`, `current_index=1`, same `answers_digest`. Authority: `authority_digest=8856ca5146cd74a6e9ed05dcd06747a694cd4f8415ee0575d673d04c9e310f09` (`workflow.json`).\n- Preceding events in `ledger.json`: gen 23 / msg 205 entered `customer_attestation` with `clarification_field=activity_category` (answers_digest b41b0054...); gens 0-21 (msgs 161-203) are plain `collecting` questions.\n\n**Authority fields it used (source chain)**\n1. `_publish` selects authority: `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:89` `authority = self._current_authority(session)`, `:90` `answers = service.reconciliation_answers(authority=authority)`.\n2. Authority identity is derived in `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_authority.py:88 _authority()` and `:152 _current_authority()`, then validated against the registry. The identity is **correct and consistent** (`authority_digest` matches the session; consent_granted=True, customer_enabled=False). The wrong-authority claim as an identity-selection failure is NOT supported.\n3. The advisory is NOT re-run for the final card: `:96-110` reuses the persisted record (digest 6c41af10) because `record[\"answers_digest\"] == answers_digest`, so `reconciliation = reconciliation_from_payload(record[\"advisory\"])`. That advisory is the **pre-clarification** one (only activity_category was clarified at gen 23).\n4. The summary is then spliced: `:127-132` — because `current_index` (1) is truthy, `summary_ko = render_authoritative_customer_summary(answers)` using the **post-clarification** `answers`; then `:133-136` drops ambiguities/contradictions/clarifications but keeps `facts_ko` and `safety_observations_ko` from the stale advisory.\n\n**Confirmed: H2 is a real mixing bug, but its exact mechanism is a persistence/timing mismatch, not a wrong authority identity.** The reconciliation record is advanced across the clarification revision by `revise_reconciliation_answer()` → `advance_reconciliation()` (checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding.py:529; nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py `advance_reconciliation`), which updates `answers_digest` + `current_index`/`state` **without regenerating `advisory`**. So at gen 24 the staleness guard compares digest ade50836 == current ade50836 and passes, treating the stale advisory as authoritative. The published card mixes (a) a freshly derived summary from post-clarification answers with (b) stale pre-clarification facts/safety copy describing only \"주 3회 근력운동\" (no 60-min intensity, no 6000-8000 steps).\n\n**How the two visible symptoms are produced (this is H1 layered on H2):**\n- `미입력` and the **bad health warning** come from a field-schema mismatch in `render_authoritative_customer_summary` (`nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py:59-106`), NOT from authority selection:\n  - It reads `value('goal')` (`:90`), `value('training_details')` (`:92-94`), `value('medical_conditions')`/`pregnancy_lactation` (`:73-77`) — but the live `answers` schema (`nutrition_onboarding_contract.py QUESTION_FIELDS`) uses `goal_type`, no `training_details`, `conditions`, `pregnancy_breastfeeding`, and structured dicts `{\"status\":\"none\",\"items\":[]}` for allergies/intolerances/conditions/medications. Result: `goal` missing → `목표: 미입력`; `training_details` missing → `활동: <activity_category> · 미입력`; allergy/restriction block prints the raw dict.\n  - Health check (`:76-77`) flags \"검토할 입력이 있습니다\" because `medications` is a dict (stringified, not in {없음,해당 없음,아니요}) and `eating_disorder_risk` is boolean `False` → `\"False\"`, a **false-positive review warning**, even though the stored `advisory.safety_observations_ko` correctly says nothing needs review. This is a projection/timing mismatch between the renderer's assumed field/type shape and the real answers shape.\n\n**Net verdict:** H2 confirmed in substance — the initial summary card does fuse stale pre-clarification advisory content with a freshly derived override — but the specific `미입력`/health-warning visual defects are caused by the renderer's field-name/type mismatch against the actual answers schema, which is independent of authority. No authority identity error was found; the fault is (1) advisory not refreshed on clarification resolution and (2) `render_authoritative_customer_summary` mapping non-EXISTENT field names (goal, training_details, medical_conditions, pregnancy_lactation, religious_restrictions) / flat-string assumptions onto the real structured schema (goal_type, conditions, pregnancy_breastfeeding, religious_ethical_exclusions, `{status,items}` dicts, booleans).\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\nThe two defects should be treated as separate fixes:\n1. **Refresh/authority timing (H2):** in `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py` `_publish()` (or `advance_reconciliation` in checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py), either regenerate the advisory once the reconciliation reaches `resolved` with a changed `answers_digest`, or stop overriding `summary_ko`/carrying stale `facts_ko`/`safety_observations_ko` from the pre-revision record. Guard on `(record.answers_digest == current answers_digest)` is insufficient when the digest was advanced by the clarification itself.\n2. **Renderer schema (H1):** align `render_authoritative_customer_summary` (hermes-agent `gateway/platforms/nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py:59-106`) with the real `QUESTION_FIELDS`/answer shapes (goal_type, training_details/activity_rationale, conditions, pregnancy_breastfeeding, religious_ethical_exclusions, and `{status,items}` structured fields with `미입력` for `status==\"none\"`), so `미입력` and the false \"건강 관련 입력: 검토할 입력이 있습니다\" disappear.\n\nVerification done: read-only; confirmed against durable `workflow.json`, `session.json`, `ledger.json`, and both the hermes-agent source and the live profile's `checkin_cli` domain code; cross-validated with sibling task `st_01a00a93` which independently reproduced the same renderer defects. No files modified, no network/service access.\n</next_steps>\n</results>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":441161,"turns":19,"tool_calls":41,"output_tokens":17352,"total_tokens":1140860,"generation_ms":332310,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":0,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9717015383657845,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.914180406370048}}