{"task_id":"st_01a00a93","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"clinepass/cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-16T12:34:55.691Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:58:05.207Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"summary-ux-review","task_summary":"Review Telegram summary copy defects from screenshot","description":"Review Telegram summary copy defects from screenshot","category":"visual-engineering","requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"high"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/qwen3.8-max","display":"ClinePass Qwen3.8 Max","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only UX/copy review of the supplied Telegram customer summary screenshot. The visible defects include internal dict syntax in allergy/intolerance/restriction summary, `목표: 미입력` despite a maintain goal, activity copy ending in `미입력`, and `건강 관련 입력: 검토할 입력이 있습니다` despite all synthetic safety fields being none/false. Hypothesis H3: even if technically accurate, the copy model lacks a customer-facing presentation layer. Define an exact concise Korean target summary for the same synthetic inputs, preserving safety disclaimers and Telegram readability, with no developer terminology. Identify every blocking CJK/copy issue and acceptance criteria for fresh screenshot QA. Do not edit code or access live systems.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on VISUAL/UI tasks.\n\n<DESIGN_SYSTEM_WORKFLOW_MANDATE>\n## YOU ARE A VISUAL ENGINEER. FOLLOW THIS WORKFLOW OR YOUR OUTPUT IS REJECTED.\n\n**YOUR FAILURE MODE**: You skip design system analysis and jump straight to writing components with hardcoded colors, arbitrary spacing, and ad-hoc font sizes. The result is INCONSISTENT GARBAGE that looks like 5 different people built it. THIS STOPS NOW.\n\n**EVERY visual task follows this EXACT workflow. VIOLATION = BROKEN OUTPUT.**\n\n### PHASE 1: ANALYZE THE DESIGN SYSTEM (MANDATORY FIRST ACTION)\n\n**BEFORE writing a SINGLE line of CSS, HTML, JSX, Svelte, or component code - you MUST:**\n\n1. **SEARCH for the design system.** Use Grep, Glob, Read - actually LOOK:\n   - Design tokens: colors, spacing, typography, shadows, border-radii\n   - Theme files: CSS variables, Tailwind config, `theme.ts`, styled-components theme, design tokens file\n   - Shared/base components: Button, Card, Input, Layout primitives\n   - Existing UI patterns: How are pages structured? What spacing grid? What color usage?\n\n2. **READ at minimum 5-10 existing UI components.** Understand:\n   - Naming conventions (BEM? Atomic? Utility-first? Component-scoped?)\n   - Spacing system (4px grid? 8px? Tailwind scale? CSS variables?)\n   - Color usage (semantic tokens? Direct hex? Theme references?)\n   - Typography scale (heading levels, body, caption - how many? What font stack?)\n   - Component composition patterns (slots? children? compound components?)\n\n**DO NOT proceed to Phase 2 until you can answer ALL of these. If you cannot, you have not explored enough. EXPLORE MORE.**\n\n### PHASE 2: NO DESIGN SYSTEM? BUILD ONE. NOW.\n\nIf Phase 1 reveals NO coherent design system (or scattered, inconsistent patterns):\n\n1. **STOP. Do NOT build the requested UI yet.**\n2. **Extract what exists** - even inconsistent patterns have salvageable decisions.\n3. **Create a minimal design system FIRST:**\n   - Color palette: primary, secondary, neutral, semantic (success/warning/error/info)\n   - Typography scale: heading levels (h1-h4 minimum), body, small, caption\n   - Spacing scale: consistent increments (4px or 8px base)\n   - Border radii, shadows, transitions - systematic, not random\n   - Component primitives: the reusable building blocks\n4. **Commit/save the design system, THEN proceed to Phase 3.**\n\nA design system is NOT optional overhead. It is the FOUNDATION. Building UI without one is like building a house on sand. It WILL collapse into inconsistency.\n\n### PHASE 3: BUILD WITH THE SYSTEM. NEVER AROUND IT.\n\n**NOW and ONLY NOW** - implement the requested visual work:\n\n| Element | CORRECT | WRONG (WILL BE REJECTED) |\n|---------|---------|--------------------------|\n| Color | Design token / CSS variable | Hardcoded `#3b82f6`, `rgb(59,130,246)` |\n| Spacing | System value (`space-4`, `gap-md`, `var(--spacing-4)`) | Arbitrary `margin: 13px`, `padding: 7px` |\n| Typography | Scale value (`text-lg`, `heading-2`, token) | Ad-hoc `font-size: 17px` |\n| Component | Extend/compose from existing primitives | One-off div soup with inline styles |\n| Border radius | System token | Random `border-radius: 6px` |\n\n**IF the design requires something OUTSIDE the current system:**\n- **Extend the system FIRST** - add the new token/primitive\n- **THEN use the new token** in your component\n- **NEVER one-off override.** That is how design systems die.\n\n### PHASE 4: VERIFY BEFORE CLAIMING DONE\n\nBEFORE reporting visual work as complete, answer these:\n\n- [ ] Does EVERY color reference a design token or CSS variable?\n- [ ] Does EVERY spacing use the system scale?\n- [ ] Does EVERY component follow the existing composition pattern?\n- [ ] Would a designer see CONSISTENCY across old and new components?\n- [ ] Are there ZERO hardcoded magic numbers for visual properties?\n\n**If ANY answer is NO - FIX IT. You are NOT done.**\n\n</DESIGN_SYSTEM_WORKFLOW_MANDATE>\n\n<DESIGN_QUALITY>\nDesign-first mindset (AFTER design system is established):\n- Bold aesthetic choices over safe defaults\n- Unexpected layouts, asymmetry, grid-breaking elements\n- Distinctive typography (avoid: Arial, Inter, Roboto, Space Grotesk)\n- Cohesive color palettes with sharp accents\n- High-impact animations with staggered reveals\n- Atmosphere: gradient meshes, noise textures, layered transparencies\n\nAVOID: Generic fonts, purple gradients on white, predictable layouts, cookie-cutter patterns.\n</DESIGN_QUALITY>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"All evidence gathered — the screenshot defects are fully traceable. Composing the review.\n\n---\n\n## Read-only UX/copy review — Telegram customer summary card (task st_01a00a93)\n\n### What I verified (no code edits, no live access)\n\n- **Screenshots**: `/tmp/sshclip-clipboard-20260816-2131{15,22}*.png` (Telegram Desktop, `dual_coach_pilot_test_bot`, 21:31–21:32). Image tokens unsupported by this model, so I OCR'd them (rapidocr, multiple crop/upscale passes). Independently confirmed on the card, confidence ≥ 0.86: the dict leak `{'items': [], 'status': 'none'} · {'items': [], 'status': 'none'} · {'items': [], 'status': 'none'}` on the 알레르기 line, and bullets `- 키: 180cm`, `- 체중: 80kg`. (Two low-confidence lines resembling 흡연/음주 bullets could not be resolved; not relied on below.)\n- **Exact synthetic inputs**: the card was generated from the canonical `example_answer` synthetic set — `profile-package/checkin_cli/nutrition_onboarding_contract.py:79-107` (DOB 1996-08-01, male, **height 180 / weight 80**, **`activity_category: moderate`**, rationale \"주 3회 근력 운동\", **`goal_type: maintain`**, all 7 structured fields `{\"status\":\"none\",\"items\":[]}`, **`pregnancy_breastfeeding: False`**, **`eating_disorder_risk: False`**, 기본 조리 가능, 보통, 3끼, schedule \"없음\"). Matches screenshot values 1:1.\n- **Causal chain** (evidence snapshots, `repository-runtime-closure/gateway/platforms/`):\n  - `nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py:62-68` — `value()` coerces any stored value with `str()` → dict repr leaks (D1).\n  - `:93, :96` — reads keys `goal` and `training_details` that **do not exist**; canonical keys are `goal_type` / `activity_rationale` (`QUESTION_FIELDS`, contract `:13-38`) → `목표: 미입력` (D2), activity ends `미입력` (D3).\n  - `:70-81` — health gate checks nonexistent `medical_conditions`/`pregnancy_lactation` (real: `conditions`/`pregnancy_breastfeeding`) and compares stringified values against `{\"없음\",\"해당 없음\",\"아니요\"}`; `False` → `\"False\"` and dict → repr both trip it → false `검토할 입력이 있습니다` (D4).\n  - `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_copy.py:100-147` — storage shapes that defeat the formatter: `{\"status\",\"items\"}` dicts, English enum codes (`moderate`, `maintain`), booleans.\n  - `nutrition_onboarding_reconciler.py:50-75` — the advisory copy model receives raw `json.dumps(answers)` with zero presentation rules.\n\n### H3 verdict\n\n**Confirmed.** There is no customer-facing presentation layer between stored answer shapes and rendered copy. Both authorities fail the same way: the deterministic formatter (`render_authoritative_customer_summary`) stringifies internal structures and reads wrong keys; the advisory model is handed raw JSON and only told \"list fields contain Korean strings.\" The output is technically truthful about the *store* and false about the *customer*. A presentation layer that maps canonical fields → Korean labels is the missing component.\n\n### Exact target summary (same synthetic inputs, Telegram-ready)\n\nFollows the product's existing copy system — header, `- ` bullets, `·` separators, and the disclaimer sentences reused **verbatim** from `nutrition_onboarding_reconciliation.py:131,147-148` and `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_publication.py:140-143`:\n\n```text\n입력 내용을 정리했어요\n\n- 목표: 유지\n- 활동: 보통 · 주 3회 근력 운동\n- 신체: 키 180cm · 체중 80kg\n- 식사: 하루 3끼\n- 조리·예산: 기본 조리 가능 · 보통\n- 식사 시간: 특별한 제약 없음\n- 알레르기·불내증·식품 제한: 해당 없음\n- 건강 관련 입력: 별도 검토 입력이 없습니다.\n\n이 요약은 참고용이며 안전 판정·승인·활성화를 대신하지 않습니다.\n내용이 맞으면 아래 확인 버튼을 눌러 주세요.\n```\n\nPost-confirmation footnote (unchanged): `아래 버튼을 누르면 입력 확인이 저장되고 운영자 검토로 넘어갑니다. 이 단계에서 영양 코칭이 시작되거나 활성화되지는 않습니다.`\n\nCopy rules encoded by this target: enum codes → customer labels (`maintain`→유지, `moderate`→보통); all-none structured fields collapse to one `해당 없음`; booleans → 아니오/해당 없음 semantics, never `False`; a genuinely empty optional field is **omitted or phrased `아직 입력되지 않았어요`** — the token `미입력` is banned customer-side.\n\n### Blocking CJK/copy issues\n\n1. **B1 — Internal dict repr in customer text.** `{'items': [], 'status': 'none'}` with ASCII braces/quotes inside Hangul sentences. Developer syntax visible to the customer; also mixes straight/curly quote glyphs. Blocking.\n2. **B2 — `목표: 미입력` despite a maintain goal.** Factually wrong statement about the customer's own answer (root cause: key mismatch `goal` ≠ `goal_type`). Blocking.\n3. **B3 — Activity line ends `미입력`** and leaks the English enum `moderate` (key mismatch `training_details` ≠ `activity_rationale`). Blocking.\n4. **B4 — False safety signal.** `건강 관련 입력: 검토할 입력이 있습니다.` when every safety input is none/false. Safety-adjacent copy lying in the alarming direction; trains customers to ignore the warning when it is real. Blocking.\n5. **B5 — Field-name contract drift (root cause of B2–B4).** Formatter keys (`goal`, `training_details`, `medical_conditions`, `pregnancy_lactation`, `religious_restrictions`) do not match `QUESTION_FIELDS` (`goal_type`, `activity_rationale`, `conditions`, `pregnancy_breastfeeding`, `religious_ethical_exclusions`). Every mismatched key silently renders as missing data. Blocking.\n6. **B6 — English enum values in customer copy.** Any fix must map `sedentary/light/moderate/very_active/extra_active` and `loss/maintain/gain` to 좌식/가벼움/보통/매우 활동적/최고 활동 and 감량/유지/증량 (labels already exist in `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_copy.py:117-129`). Blocking for the customer surface.\n7. **B7 — Stringified-value health gate.** The allowlist `{없음, 해당 없음, 아니요}` evaluated on `str(value)` misclassifies `False`, `None`, `[]`, and dict shapes. Must evaluate semantics (structured `status == \"none\"`, booleans false), not strings. Blocking.\n\nNon-blocking: `없음 · 없음 · 없음 · 없음`-style repetition when multiple restriction fields are empty (collapse to one phrase); `- 식사 시간: 없음` reads curt (use `특별한 제약 없음`).\n\n### Acceptance criteria for fresh screenshot QA\n\n**Capture**: Telegram Desktop, customer DM topic, full card visible without \"더 보기\" truncation, bot name + timestamp in frame.\n\n**Negative checks (must have zero occurrences in the card text):**\n- `{`, `}`, `'items'`, `'status'`, `repr`-style quotes around Korean text\n- `미입력` on any field that has a stored value; ideally no `미입력` at all\n- standalone English enums: `moderate|sedentary|light|very_active|extra_active|maintain|loss|gain|False|True|None`\n- `검토할 입력이 있습니다` when all safety fields are none/false\n- keys or phrasing: `goal_type`, `training_details`, `medical_conditions`, `pregnancy_lactation`\n\n**Positive checks for the all-none synthetic input (this case):**\n- `- 목표: 유지` present; activity line contains `보통` and `주 3회 근력 운동`, ends without `미입력`\n- restrictions line reads exactly `해당 없음`\n- health line reads exactly `별도 검토 입력이 없습니다.`\n- both disclaimer sentences verbatim; `- ` bullet style and `·` separators consistent; every line ≤ ~60 chars; total well under Telegram's 4096 limit\n\n**Regression pairs (second screenshot each):**\n- *provided-items case* (e.g., allergies `{\"status\":\"provided\",\"items\":[\"유당\"]}`, conditions provided): items render as comma-joined Korean text, no dict syntax, and the health line flips to `검토할 입력이 있습니다.` **only** when a safety field is genuinely provided/true.\n- *genuinely-empty optional case*: empty optional renders as omitted line or `아직 입력되지 않았어요`, never `미입력`.\n\n**Unit seam**: pin these as tests against `render_authoritative_customer_summary` with the `example_answer` set as input — the all-none fixture must produce the exact target card above (deterministic, no LLM in the loop).\n\nNo files were modified; no live system, service, or Telegram surface was touched.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":486716,"turns":31,"tool_calls":42,"output_tokens":19744,"total_tokens":999288,"generation_ms":363672,"tokens_per_second":54,"cost_usd":0,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.986147859922179,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8804749965289972}}