{"task_id":"st_01a00ac7","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":false,"created_at":"2026-08-16T13:34:05.586Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:58:04.832Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"gate20-network-harness-adjudication","task_summary":"Classify Gate20 network-isolated failures","description":"Classify Gate20 network-isolated failures","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only adjudication in /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach and /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent. Inspect the sealed Gate20 root task26-gates18-20-clarification-normalized-4e9962...-st_01a0080c. Hypothesis H1: the global network-isolation harness invalidly blocks Discord/Matrix tests that deliberately exercise attachment/media fetch via mocked/local network, so 21 failures are harness-induced. Trace exact failure stack, isolation mechanism, and test contracts. Hypothesis H3: ambient env setup caused the runtime-footer failure. Return file:line evidence, exact failing node IDs grouped by cause, and a lawful append-only recertification design that does not erase/rerun the sealed failed full run. Do not run tests or commands, modify files/evidence/live state/service/network/Git, or access external network.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as a precise append-only recertification ruling - I’ll define the binding, evidence, verdict, and node-selection rules without treating the sealed Gate20 failure as passed.\n\n## Required receipt layout\n\nCreate a new sibling record; never write beneath or replace the sealed Gate20 artifact:\n\n```text\n<gate20-parent>/\n  <sealed-gate20-root>/                         # unchanged, remains FAIL\n  recertifications/\n    <gate20-root-sha256>-harness-adjudication-v1/\n      adjudication.json\n      targeted-nodeids.txt\n      targeted-result.json\n      targeted-output.log\n      harness-manifest.json\n      environment-manifest.json\n      artifact-index.json\n```\n\n`artifact-index.json` must bind every file by relative path, byte length, and SHA-256.\n\n### `adjudication.json`\n\nRequired fields:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"schema\": \"dualcoach-gate20-harness-adjudication-v1\",\n  \"receipt_kind\": \"append_only_successor\",\n  \"candidate_eligible\": false,\n  \"verdict\": \"PASS_NON_CANDIDATE_HARNESS_INVALIDATED\",\n  \"original_gate20\": {\n    \"verdict\": \"FAIL\",\n    \"preserved\": true,\n    \"root_path\": \"<exact sealed root path>\",\n    \"root_manifest_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"artifact_index_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"full_run_command_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"full_run_output_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"failed_nodeids_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"candidate_digest\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"repository_status_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\"\n  },\n  \"prior_receipts\": {\n    \"gate18\": {\n      \"path\": \"<original immutable path>\",\n      \"file_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n      \"payload_receipt_sha256\": \"<64 hex or null>\",\n      \"candidate_digest\": \"<64 hex>\",\n      \"rebound\": true\n    },\n    \"gate19\": {\n      \"path\": \"<original immutable path>\",\n      \"file_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n      \"payload_receipt_sha256\": \"<64 hex or null>\",\n      \"candidate_digest\": \"<64 hex>\",\n      \"rebound\": true\n    }\n  },\n  \"harness_finding\": {\n    \"classification\": \"INVALID_TEST_HARNESS\",\n    \"mechanism\": \"global_network_isolation_preempted_mocked_media_contract\",\n    \"affected_nodeids_sha256\": \"<sha256(targeted-nodeids.txt bytes)>\",\n    \"failure_signature_sha256\": \"<canonical stack-signature digest>\",\n    \"unaffected_failures\": []\n  },\n  \"recertification\": {\n    \"scope\": \"targeted_only\",\n    \"full_suite_rerun\": false,\n    \"sealed_run_rerun\": false,\n    \"targeted_result\": \"PASS\",\n    \"targeted_result_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"targeted_output_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"harness_manifest_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\",\n    \"environment_manifest_sha256\": \"<64 hex>\"\n  },\n  \"effects\": {\n    \"sealed_artifacts_modified\": 0,\n    \"service_actions\": 0,\n    \"network_actions\": 0,\n    \"git_actions\": 0,\n    \"profile_mutations\": 0\n  },\n  \"issued_at_utc\": \"<RFC3339 UTC>\",\n  \"receipt_sha256\": \"<canonical payload digest>\"\n}\n```\n\n`receipt_sha256` should follow the existing receipt convention in `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_admin.py:615-663`: hash canonical JSON with sorted keys and compact separators before adding `receipt_sha256`.\n\n## Required bindings\n\nRecord these hashes independently; a directory hash alone is insufficient:\n\n- Exact Git commit/tree digest.\n- `git status --porcelain=v1 -z --untracked-files=all` SHA-256.\n- Candidate manifest SHA-256 and `candidate_digest`.\n- Wheel SHA-256, if Gate18 sealed a wheel.\n- Python executable and lockfile SHA-256.\n- `pyproject.toml`, `uv.lock`, `tests/conftest.py`, `scripts/run_tests.sh`, and `scripts/run_tests_parallel.py` SHA-256.\n- Every affected production and test source file SHA-256.\n- Original Gate20 command, environment, node list, output, summary, and artifact-index SHA-256.\n- Corrected harness source/config SHA-256.\n- Targeted command, ordered node list, output, JUnit/JSON result, and exit-code evidence SHA-256.\n- Gate18 and Gate19 original receipt-file hashes.\n- Hash of the adjudication rationale itself.\n\nThe environment manifest must explicitly record:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"TERMINAL_CWD\": null,\n  \"PYTEST_PLUGINS\": [],\n  \"network_policy\": {\n    \"external_egress\": \"denied\",\n    \"loopback\": \"allowed\",\n    \"unix_sockets\": \"allowed\",\n    \"event_loop_socketpair\": \"allowed\",\n    \"mocked_transports\": \"allowed\",\n    \"dns_fixture\": \"deterministic\"\n  }\n}\n```\n\n## Gate18/19 rebinding\n\nThe existing controller establishes the lawful rebinding pattern:\n\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:292-325` binds historical workspace receipt, workspace index, synthetic-identity receipt, repository status, and candidate digest.\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:267-289` validates prior synthetic-identity evidence by both path hash and required payload facts.\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:327-365` validates the provider receipt against the same candidate digest and exact side-effect/request contract.\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:390-406` records prior receipt hashes rather than regenerating them.\n\nTherefore Gate18/19 receipts may be rebound only when:\n\n1. Their original files remain byte-identical.\n2. Their recorded candidate digest equals Gate20’s candidate digest.\n3. Every source/config/profile surface they attest remains hash-identical.\n4. Their claims are independent of the invalid Gate20 harness.\n5. Any time-sensitive readiness claim is revalidated separately; the historical receipt itself is not rewritten.\n\nMay be rebound:\n\n- Immutable candidate/workspace manifest and index.\n- Wheel/package hash evidence.\n- Repository-status evidence, if unchanged.\n- Synthetic-identity evidence, if its bound profile facts remain unchanged.\n- Provider-auth receipt only if its candidate binding and readiness validity remain acceptable under its own policy.\n\nMay not be rebound:\n\n- Gate20’s full-suite PASS claim—none exists.\n- Gate20’s failed-node disposition.\n- Any Gate18/19 receipt whose candidate, repository status, source file, config, wheel, or profile snapshot differs.\n- A prior provider-readiness receipt if the plan requires freshness rather than merely historical proof.\n\n## Verdict semantics\n\nKeep both facts:\n\n```text\nGate20 original verdict: FAIL\nGate20 candidate status: NOT CERTIFIED\nSuccessor targeted adjudication: PASS_NON_CANDIDATE_HARNESS_INVALIDATED\nCandidate eligible: false\n```\n\nDo not call the successor `Gate20 PASS`, `full-suite PASS`, or `candidate PASS`.\n\nThe successor means only:\n\n> The listed failures are invalid evidence against the candidate because the imposed harness contradicted their mocked-network contracts, and the exact listed nodes passed under a corrected hermetic harness.\n\nPromotion still requires a new candidate/full-suite gate if the release plan requires a clean full run.\n\n## Targeted node artifact\n\nThe authoritative `targeted-nodeids.txt` must be generated by exact set intersection:\n\n```text\nsealed Gate20 failed node IDs\n∩\nnodes whose sealed stack reaches the network-isolation primitive\n∩\nnodes whose test contract mocks transport or intentionally uses local networking\n```\n\nIt must be newline-delimited, UTF-8, sorted bytewise, with no `-k`, class wildcard, or file-level selector.\n\nSource-confirmed DNS-sensitive candidates are:\n\n```text\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_pdf_document_cached\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_txt_content_injected\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_md_content_injected\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_log_content_injected\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_mid_sized_zip_under_32mb_is_cached\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_zip_document_cached\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_large_txt_cached_not_injected\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestIncomingDocumentHandling::test_multiple_text_files_both_injected\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestAllowAnyAttachment::test_unknown_type_cached_when_flag_on\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestAllowAnyAttachment::test_unknown_type_no_content_type_becomes_octet_stream\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestAllowAnyAttachment::test_max_attachment_bytes_zero_means_unlimited\ntests/gateway/test_discord_document_handling.py::TestAllowAnyAttachment::test_allowlisted_doc_unchanged_when_flag_on\ntests/gateway/test_matrix.py::TestMatrixImageOnlyMediaNormalization::test_external_media_download_rejects_oversized_content_length\ntests/gateway/test_matrix.py::TestMatrixImageOnlyMediaNormalization::test_external_media_download_rejects_oversized_stream\ntests/gateway/test_matrix.py::TestMatrixImageOnlyMediaNormalization::test_external_media_download_rejects_unsafe_redirect\ntests/gateway/test_matrix.py::TestMatrixImageOnlyMediaNormalization::test_external_media_download_rejects_non_image_content_type\n```\n\nThese 16 are source-confirmed candidates, not a lawful substitute for the sealed 21-node list. The remaining five must come from the sealed Gate20 failed-node artifact and matching stacks. Since the supplied sealed-root identifier was abbreviated with `...`, no exact readable artifact path was available under the no-command constraint; claiming five additional IDs would fabricate evidence.\n\nThe runtime-footer node must be separate:\n\n```text\ntests/gateway/test_runtime_footer.py::test_build_footer_no_data_returns_empty_even_when_enabled\n```\n\nIt must not be included in the harness-invalidated set unless its sealed stack independently proves post-fixture environment injection.\n\n## Does plan language forbid this?\n\nNo inspected code or task language forbids an append-only, non-candidate successor adjudication. The user’s original constraint expressly allowed such a design by requiring that the sealed failed full run not be erased or rerun.\n\nWhat is forbidden by the existing fail-closed contracts is using this successor as a candidate/full-suite PASS:\n\n- `dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:380-406` requires exact candidate and historical-evidence binding.\n- `dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller.py:463-518` revalidates those bindings before launch.\n- The controller has no mechanism for converting a failed gate into a successful one.\n\nThus append-only `PASS_NON_CANDIDATE_HARNESS_INVALIDATED` is lawful; rebadging Gate20 or promoting the candidate solely from it is not.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":121004,"turns":4,"tool_calls":11,"output_tokens":3810,"total_tokens":512846,"generation_ms":116844,"tokens_per_second":33,"cost_usd":0.454552,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9949286696051945,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9625723917365373}}