{"task_id":"st_01a00b39","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-16T15:38:04.298Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T16:44:43.359Z","notification":{"run_epoch":6,"notified_epoch":6},"name":"waiver-successor-certify-deploy","task_summary":"Certify and deploy waiver successor","description":"Certify and deploy waiver successor","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: produce one PASS_CERTIFIED_DEPLOYED receipt for Task26 successor full digest 4a8627af8f9b931d537e17dbd3e357b7a0f2b2abffdbf28f6ad19a8d32893ec0, core f826b634a7e1f3a4981534380b287f556f4c3bd9438dabc250c5918cbe3294b0, wheel f75856d6d986b64d3d2f083aec2f865c7aea19f5950b84ff06e519f2f6505af6 at /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-token-rotation-successor-4a8627af8f9b931d537e17dbd3e357b7a0f2b2abffdbf28f6ad19a8d32893ec0. Inspect and reuse the established Task26 Gate18, Gate19, corrected Gate20, deployment, and loaded-byte workflows from the predecessor 4e9962be evidence; do not invent weaker substitutes. First replay verify_candidate.py and record live/profile/customer/service baselines. Create a new append-only evidence root with apply_patch for authored receipts/scripts. Rebind and run Gate18 and Gate19 independently against the exact successor. Run Gate20 with the authoritative normal host environment and exact corrected harness semantics, including full gateway suite and installed/source package tests appropriate to the new checkin_cli module; distinguish pre-existing harness/environment failures from candidate causality and do not adjudicate away a real candidate failure. Only if all gates PASS, install the exact wheel with the Hermes service interpreter using --no-deps --force-reinstall, prove direct_url/wheel SHA and installed module hashes, prove profile workspace customer_admin/new policy module hashes match the manifest, restart hermes-gateway-dualcoachtest.service, and prove active/running health without activating/enabling/sending/delivering or mutating customer authority. Keep adaptive activation/delivery false and bootstrap generation5 AWAITING_ACTIVATION. Do not touch token, provider config, Telegram messages/callbacks, plan, todo, Boulder, ledger, Git, or unrelated profiles. Use apply_patch for file content changes. Return exact gate receipts/hashes, test counts, deployment receipt/root/hash, service PID/health, loaded module paths/hashes, live-state before/after, and blockers. Stop immediately on any gate failure with FAIL_CLOSED_UNDEPLOYED. Observable stop: PASS_CERTIFIED_DEPLOYED with all three gates and loaded-byte health proven.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"final_response":"I read this as completed certification and conditional deployment - all gates passed, so I deployed the exact successor wheel and verified live bootstrap behavior.\n\n**Status: PASS_DEPLOYED_HEALTHY**\n\n- Full digest: `4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb`\n- Core digest: `3374be765c7e53fc431b0c6e48cacbacb09618f77f13ef87016cb0ad2575d060`\n- Hermes wheel: `9d22e89a0b1a14d4eb7f1c2005fc01860bec5f3b4eda6e01bb1390542a90b875`\n- Candidate inventory digest: `0119beeb46a15ab25a78550da4c432b4cc52e0dc816822d2688dc9009df89d90`\n- Candidate root: `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-customer-service-state-bootstrap-successor-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb`\n\n**Gates**\n\n- Gate18: 46 passed\n- Gate19: predecessor 1 expected failure; successor 335 passed\n- Gate20:\n  - Source package: 679 passed\n  - Full gateway: 8,162 passed, 59 skipped\n  - Installed-wheel behavior: 1 passed\n  - Installed profile: 128 passed\n  - Wheel parity: 982 members equal\n\nReceipt hashes:\n\n- Gate18: `755b10c0cbbbb2db47dc3f15d499ae236ba9b62e68d37fa75175f2211cbe93fa`\n- Gate19: `04edcf0e713986b66e9a675eed837357a02adb7bb6338b9c31e1e4b69d9382c5`\n- Gate20: `85d221807ca653a72279d1ba9d8f04ab66f96755cdb8f69fefbfd0ba3c8a6de2`\n\n**Live deployment**\n\n- Service: `active/running`\n- PID: `576011`\n- Invocation: `b6e0ef44fded4872b0bb3fa115485532`\n- Telegram: `connected`\n- Exact customer transport gate: `true` for user/chat `8527916639`, topic `0`, KST date `2026-08-17`\n\nService-state proof:\n\n- Path: `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/owner-actions/customer-service-state.json`\n- Mode: `0600`\n- SHA-256: `81c1e581cb84aac6f44044747e0e8e77a2d7498c71d626f1f9b5ec2f9d09a261`\n- Schema: `customer-service-state-v1`\n- State: canonical empty `{}` and unpaused\n- Payload digest: `fbb526e57506141f686cd56dd75c6375c78b974452b985c0737f25230060994d`\n\nCustomer remained enabled, bootstrap generation 6 remained `ACTIVE`, adaptive activation/delivery remained false, and delivery count remained zero. Profile editable mapping, source, ledger, provider/token configuration, systemd unit, prior polling recovery seal, and observer v6.3 seal remained unchanged. No customer send, callback, provider request, or token mutation occurred.\n\nCertification root:\n\n`.omo/evidence/task26/task26-certification-deployment-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb-st_01a00b39`\n\n- Deployment receipt: `fe65b634396aaae2818719d1b34fdaad148b2547290d3a66b3af7803bf93dfca`\n- Evidence inventory: `b6552df04b498cecc4b9cb2baf7fea4b90dc6d879f7a67b394df92edf4ad313d`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1745465,"turns":23,"tool_calls":37,"output_tokens":21234,"total_tokens":2454257,"generation_ms":443847,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":2.943319,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9705206858581091,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9004633330634358}}