{"task_id":"st_01a00e61","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-17T06:20:59.344Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T01:19:35.222Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task26-review-objective","task_summary":"Review objective and invariant coverage","description":"Review objective and invariant coverage","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Review the completed Task26 exact candidate and evidence for objective/constraint coverage only. Bind source candidate full 4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb, lifecycle seal 50e7556e58a876d8136fbfb2023ede8bcb46ac816d97d4b85e1d0559f463d008, cleanup seal 84d937ef67c1517bfdbca4cabce9fb4bfbe39aa1165458bb3aedd14decc4bff0, archive root 9f5d72840b4cc1fcb57720a61ebc53529fa00202d9201615e4ebdbb3e047a635. Read the active plan, ledger, candidate/evidence inventories and verifier outputs. Map every revised objective, invariant, Task26 acceptance clause, and F1/F4/F5 requirement to concrete evidence. Verify owner/operator sole authority, explicit-send only, real customer DM exactly one message232, disabled/clean poststate. Do not mutate anything or trust summaries without opening evidence. Return PASS only if complete; otherwise findings ordered by severity with exact paths/claims and remediation.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a final evidence-only Task26 coverage audit - bind the supplied artifacts, map the requirements, and return PASS only if every clause is proved.\n\n# Verdict: FAIL / NO-GO\n\nThe supplied hashes are authentic, and the terminal delivery/cleanup controls pass. The package does **not** prove one uninterrupted lifecycle on candidate `4a6c7ee5…1cb`, intended-surface customer observation, or completed Task26 review provenance.\n\n## Severity-ordered findings\n\n### CRITICAL — The complete lifecycle did not run on candidate `4a6c7ee5…1cb`\n\n**Claim**\n\nEven accepting this turn’s binding to `4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb`, earlier lifecycle stages were completed under predecessor candidates. Candidate `4a6c7ee5…` was deployed after activation and check-in; only generation/review/delivery and cleanup are attributable to it.\n\nThe active amendment additionally pins candidate `2e0894ea…a925` and wheel `af4a9d0a…141b`, while the reviewed candidate uses wheel `9d22e89a…875`.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- Amendment and uninterrupted-path requirement:  \n  `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md`\n- Current candidate and wheel:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-customer-service-state-bootstrap-successor-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb/candidate-manifest.json`\n- Deployment timestamp and installed bytes:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-certification-deployment-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb-st_01a00b39/receipts/deployment-receipt.json`\n- Earlier activation/check-in chronology:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/lifecycle-evidence.json`\n- Mid-lifecycle recovery under predecessor `f38d0373…`:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-telegram-poll-recovery-st_01a00d2c/FINAL-SEAL.json`  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-telegram-poll-recovery-st_01a00d2c/run-4/recovery-result.json`\n\nThis fails the revised objective, the amendment’s “uninterrupted normal path,” invariant 10, Task26’s fixed-candidate rule, F1, and F4.\n\n**Remediation**\n\nFrom an empty authenticated baseline, run the entire preflight-to-cleanup lifecycle on one newly authorized and explicitly pinned candidate/wheel, without candidate replacement or recovery-controller intervention. Resealing the existing lineage cannot repair this retrospectively.\n\n---\n\n### HIGH — Customer observation on the intended DM surface is unproved\n\n**Claim**\n\nThe evidence proves Telegram accepted exactly one `sendMessage` and returned customer-DM message `232`. It does not contain a customer handset capture, inbound acknowledgment, or independent intended-surface observation of that message. A provider API result or derived `sent_audited` event is explicitly insufficient under invariant 9.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- API send/result and message `232`:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/telegram-bot-api-events.jsonl`\n- Derived lifecycle assertion:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/lifecycle-evidence.json`\n- Current lifecycle inventory contains no screenshot/customer-surface artifact:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/inventory.json`\n- Task22–24 capture and observation requirements:  \n  `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md`\n\nThis fails invariant 9, Specification 24’s “Customer observes exactly one message,” F4, and the completion audit.\n\n**Remediation**\n\nIn the authorized replacement rehearsal, capture a hash-bound customer-DM artifact showing the single delivered message and correlate its chat, message ID, and timestamp to the durable receipt.\n\n---\n\n### HIGH — Task26 review lanes and their current-candidate input package are incomplete\n\n**Claim**\n\nThere is no complete set of fresh PASS receipts for the six Specification 26 review concerns or F1–F5 against `4a6c7ee5…`. The plan still marks Task26 and F1–F5 unchecked. Existing lifecycle/cleanup independent verifications verify seals and state, not all release-review lanes.\n\nThe retained Golden Path/Recovery Runbook binding is for `2e0894ea…`, not `4a6c7ee5…`.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- Unchecked Task26 and F1–F5:  \n  `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md`\n- Ledger has no `4a6c7ee5…`, lifecycle seal, cleanup seal, or archive-root completion entry:  \n  `.omo/start-work/ledger.jsonl`\n- Old runbook binding:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-runbook-rebind-2e0894ea-st_01a0054e/runbook-binding-receipt-v4.json`\n- Historical review is a FAIL against unrelated candidate `96e1…`, not a current receipt:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-objective-constraint-final-audit-e880717f.redacted.json`\n- Current lifecycle and cleanup integrity receipts only:  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/independent-verification.json`  \n  `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-lifecycle-cleanup-v3-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e50/independent-verification-receipt.json`\n\nThis independently fails Specification 26 and F5.\n\n**Remediation**\n\nBind current Golden Path and Recovery Runbook artifacts to the final candidate, assemble the required reviewer input package, obtain every independent PASS receipt, and then append immutable Task26/F1–F5 completion records to the ledger.\n\n---\n\n### HIGH — F5’s migrated-session requirement conflicts with the active fresh-lineage amendment\n\n**Claim**\n\nSpecification 22 and F5 require a journaled migrated-session receipt. The later amendment prohibits restoration/prepopulation from historical sessions and requires a new customer/session lineage. The archived lifecycle follows the fresh-lineage model and contains no migrated-session receipt.\n\n**Evidence**\n\n- Conflicting amendment, Specification 22, and F5 clauses:  \n  `.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md`\n- Fresh session record:  \n  `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/post-lifecycle-cleanup-archives/task26-current-4a6c7ee5-20260817/payload/data/customers/task26_live_2e_r2_20260815_8527916639/nutrition-onboarding/session.json`\n- Fresh projection history:  \n  `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/post-lifecycle-cleanup-archives/task26-current-4a6c7ee5-20260817/payload/data/nutrition-onboarding-projection-journal.jsonl`\n\n**Remediation**\n\nBefore another rehearsal, explicitly resolve the governing contract: either supersede F5’s migrated-session receipt with fresh-lineage provenance, or require a separate exact-candidate migration exercise. The current clauses cannot all be satisfied by one lifecycle.\n\n## Requested control results\n\n| Control | Result | Opened evidence |\n|---|---|---|\n| Candidate binding | **PASS** | Candidate verifier recomputed `4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb` |\n| Lifecycle seal | **PASS** | `SEAL.json` SHA-256 `50e7556e58a876d8136fbfb2023ede8bcb46ac816d97d4b85e1d0559f463d008` |\n| Cleanup seal | **PASS** | `SEAL.json` SHA-256 `84d937ef67c1517bfdbca4cabce9fb4bfbe39aa1165458bb3aedd14decc4bff0` |\n| Archive root | **PASS** | Recomputed `9f5d72840b4cc1fcb57720a61ebc53529fa00202d9201615e4ebdbb3e047a635`, 172 entries |\n| Owner/operator sole authority | **PASS** | Owner `8693203710`; approval/send records use that authority; no trainer authority/artifacts |\n| Approval separate from send | **PASS** | Approval committed with zero deliveries; separate explicit-send transition occurred later |\n| Exactly one durable customer-DM delivery | **PASS** | One idempotency row `40f24646…0f3f`, one Telegram send, message `232`, one `sent_audited` result |\n| Intended-surface customer observation | **FAIL** | No current-lifecycle handset/independent observation artifact |\n| Disabled/clean poststate | **PASS** | Service inactive/dead, PID 0, customer runtime removed, no future work, adaptive activation/delivery false, unrelated profile unchanged |\n\nDurable delivery evidence is in:\n\n- `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/post-lifecycle-cleanup-archives/task26-current-4a6c7ee5-20260817/payload/data/owner-actions/draft-deliveries.json`\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/telegram-bot-api-events.jsonl`\n\n## Objective and invariant mapping\n\n- **Objective preflight → onboarding → readiness → activation → check-in:** behavior exists, but **FAIL as exact-candidate proof** because it predates `4a6c7ee5…`.\n- **Automatic generation → draft → approval → explicit send:** **PASS on `4a6c7ee5…`**.\n- **Exactly-once durable receipt:** **PASS**; intended-surface observation remains **FAIL**.\n- **Safe disable and cleanup:** **PASS**.\n- **No recovery shortcut/uninterrupted flow:** **FAIL** because the lifecycle includes the sealed polling recovery.\n\nInvariant outcomes:\n\n- I1 disabled/no delivery before activation: **behavior PASS; exact provenance invalidated**\n- I2 zero delivery before approval: **PASS**\n- I3 zero delivery after approval/before send: **PASS**\n- I4 one provider message and one audited receipt: **PASS**\n- I5 wrong/stale/duplicate callbacks do not mutate: **PASS in exact automated gates**\n- I6 ACK failure cannot undo committed work: **PASS in exact automated gates**\n- I7 provider-auth failure/preflight behavior: **PASS in automated evidence; live preflight predates final candidate**\n- I8 restart preserves state/no duplicate: **PASS in automated evidence and sealed state**\n- I9 durable receipt plus intended-surface observation: **FAIL**\n- I10 exact immutable candidate release evidence: **FAIL**\n- I11 owner/operator sole authority and trainer-free v1: **PASS**\n\n## F1 / F4 / F5\n\n- **F1: FAIL** — objective and invariants 9/10 are incomplete.\n- **F4: FAIL** — one real API delivery is proved, but the lifecycle spans candidates/recovery and customer-surface observation is absent.\n- **F5: FAIL** — cleanup and artifact hashes pass; migrated-session and all-reviewer PASS receipts do not.\n\n## Read-only verification performed\n\n- Candidate verifier: PASS, 20 inventory entries.\n- Lifecycle inventory verifier: PASS, 11 checks, zero mutations.\n- Cleanup seal verifier: PASS, 59 evidence entries and 172 archive entries.\n- Independent live cleanup verifier: PASS, 79 checks.\n\nNo files were modified.\n\n## Remediation choices\n\n1. **Recommended — strict exact-candidate rerun:** resolve the migration clause, pin one candidate/wheel, run one fresh uninterrupted lifecycle, capture the customer surface, clean/reseal, then execute all review lanes.\n2. **Not recommended — governance reclassification:** amend the contract to accept cross-candidate incident-recovery lineage and provider receipt as customer observation. This is cheaper but weakens the exact-candidate and user-visible-completion invariants that Task26 is meant to enforce.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":586891,"turns":30,"tool_calls":95,"output_tokens":24345,"total_tokens":2782247,"generation_ms":539234,"tokens_per_second":45,"cost_usd":3.5735560000000004,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9656674078049529,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8820153870587135}}