{"task_id":"st_01a00e63","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-17T06:21:00.257Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T01:19:35.252Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"task26-review-security","task_summary":"Review privacy and authority security","description":"Review privacy and authority security","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Perform the mandatory security/privacy/authority review for Task26 final state. Bind candidate 4a6c7ee5..., lifecycle seal 50e7556..., cleanup seal 84d937..., archived delivery message232. Verify DM isolation, exact actor/chat/topic checks, owner-only draft approve/send, callback nonce/render identity/pins, exactly-once idempotency, token/provider secrecy, secure exception logging without user content, fail-closed service-state/polling recovery, config delivery_enabled true only during authorized explicit send then false after cleanup, no adaptive/automatic sends, and immutable archive modes. Inspect source and evidence directly; no mutations/network/customer actions. Return PASS only if no exploitable or policy-blocking gap; otherwise severity-ordered findings with exact paths and remediation.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a mandatory read-only Task26 security review - I completed the verification and am reporting the policy-blocking gaps.\n\n# Verdict: FAIL\n\nCandidate `4a6c7ee5…`, lifecycle seal `50e7556…`, cleanup seal `84d937…`, and Telegram message `232` are correctly bound and internally consistent. However, two medium-severity policy gaps prevent PASS.\n\n## Findings\n\n### 1. MEDIUM — `delivery_enabled` was not limited to the authorized send window\n\nThe delivery gate remained enabled after message `232` was already `sent_audited`:\n\n- `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-live-lifecycle-evidence-seal-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e44/lifecycle-evidence.json:7` — `delivery_enabled: true`\n- Same file:\n  - `:117` — customer message `232`\n  - `:123` — `sent_audited`\n  - `:150` — recorded at `2026-08-17T05:48:59Z`\n- Archived pre-cleanup configuration:\n  - `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/post-lifecycle-cleanup-archives/task26-current-4a6c7ee5-20260817/payload/config.yaml:660`\n- It was disabled only by cleanup:\n  - `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-lifecycle-cleanup-v3-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e50/cleanup_controller.py:391`\n  - Configuration changed around `15:17:26 KST`, at least 28 minutes after the sealed post-delivery state.\n\nOwner authorization and callback pins still prevented automatic or non-owner delivery, so this is not evidence of an extra send. Nevertheless, the global transport capability remained live beyond the one authorized operation.\n\n**Remediation:** Keep the global gate false and use a durable one-use capability bound to candidate, customer, draft, revision, owner actor/chat/topic, card nonce, and render message. Consume it atomically before transport. If retaining the boolean, enable it immediately before transport and restore false for success, failure, timeout, and unknown-provider outcomes before processing further updates. This historical lifecycle cannot be retroactively corrected; certification requires an explicit exception or a new lifecycle.\n\nCurrent exposure is closed: `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/config.yaml:660` is false and the service is inactive/dead.\n\n### 2. MEDIUM — Archive is tamper-evident, not immutable\n\nThe archive remains writable by its owner:\n\n- Archive root:\n  - `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/post-lifecycle-cleanup-archives/task26-current-4a6c7ee5-20260817`\n- Files are mode `0600`; directories are `0700`.\n- `lsattr` shows no immutable flag.\n- The verifier explicitly accepts writable files:\n  - `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-post-lifecycle-cleanup-v3-4a6c7ee5-st_01a00e50/verify_successor_seal.py:48`\n\nThe supplied `84d937…` pin makes subsequent modification detectable, and the archive currently matches it. It does not prevent alteration or deletion, which fails an immutable-archive requirement.\n\n**Remediation:** Preserve the existing sealed archive unchanged and copy it byte-exactly into independent WORM/object-lock storage, then issue a successor seal anchored to `84d937…`, the WORM object checksums, and retention metadata. A local alternative is root-owned storage with filesystem immutability and verifier checks for those controls, but changing existing POSIX modes would invalidate the current archive-root digest.\n\n## Controls verified\n\n- Exact candidate and both supplied seal bindings: PASS.\n- DM isolation and exact actor/chat/topic routing: PASS.\n- Owner-only approve/send: PASS.\n- Callback nonce, render identity, and generation/revision CAS pins: PASS.\n- Exactly one delivery row and provider message `232`; idempotency key `40f246…`: PASS.\n- Unknown-provider outcome and retry handling fail closed: PASS.\n- No automatic/adaptive sends observed: PASS.\n- Secret literal scan found no Telegram, OpenAI, AWS, or bearer credentials: PASS.\n- Handler-exception records contain reason codes/update IDs rather than customer message content: PASS.\n- Final service/poll state is inactive/dead, delivery disabled, with no live customer artifacts, jobs, or publications: PASS.\n\nRead-only verification executed without network or customer actions:\n\n- Lifecycle inventory verifier: 11 checks, PASS.\n- Cleanup successor verifier: 64 checks over 172 archive entries, PASS.\n- No files were modified.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":539753,"turns":16,"tool_calls":89,"output_tokens":24527,"total_tokens":1605632,"generation_ms":510183,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":3.0886950000000004,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9445137914655296,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7804162278912533}}