{"task_id":"st_01a00ed8","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-17T08:30:39.358Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T06:13:44.551Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"strict-membership-gate-implementation","task_summary":"Implement staff membership activation gate","description":"Implement staff membership activation gate","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Implement the strict-rerun customer-absence-from-staff membership gate end-to-end test-first, using the completed design from task strict-membership-gate-design as binding requirements. Work in shared source trees only: `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent` and authoritative profile package `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/workspace/checkin_cli`; use apply_patch for all edits. Do not touch plan/evidence/live config/service/state/network/Git. Preserve completed non1 dispatch fix. Deliver one coherent production increment where activation cannot succeed without fresh candidate-bound membership evidence. Required behavior: canonical staff inventory from registry/config routes; classify group/supergroup membership chats vs positive private owner DMs; group customer status only left/kicked; private DM identity separation; all errors/unknown/member/admin/creator/restricted fail; narrow read-only bot protocol get_me/get_chat_member; mode0600 hash-chained evidence journal with no names/tokens/raw responses; armed ChatMemberHandler subscription before activation, sanitized transition continuity; dualcoach_admin preflight/finalize/verify commands and activation cutover integration; profile checkin_cli activate requires and validates evidence under profile lock before writes, persists evidence/inventory/subscription hashes into prepared/committed audit and validates on runtime load. Bind candidate/full/core/inventory, both wheel hashes, deployment receipt, customer/bootstrap/generation, registry/config, inventory, timestamps and activation journal. TDD: add closest deterministic fake-bot tests for inventory completeness/dedup/classification, statuses/API failures/admin readiness/no mutation methods/canonical hashes; cutover zero writes on failure, success pass-through, crash/retry reconciliation; polling receipt ordering/idempotency/continuity; profile activation tamper/stale/missing fields before mutation and committed validation. No sleeps/network. Keep files focused; follow current style/types, no broad refactor. Run RED evidence for each seam, then GREEN focused tests, Ruff, pyright/available diagnostics, profile suites, and relevant combined gateway suites once. Return exact changed files, RED/GREEN commands/counts, remaining integration assumptions, and observable stop proof: activation path is impossible without valid current evidence and both wheels' tests pass.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as completed implementation reporting - I’ll summarize the production gate, exact files, verification evidence, and remaining deployment assumptions.\n\nImplemented a strict, candidate-bound customer-absence gate across the Hermes and profile wheels.\n\n**Observable stop proof**\n\nActivation now requires all of the following:\n\n1. Mandatory deployment receipt and membership evidence CLI arguments.\n2. A newly executed Bot API preflight using only `get_me` and `get_chat_member`.\n3. An armed `ChatMemberHandler` epoch predating observation.\n4. Canonical inventory coverage with only `left`/`kicked` accepted.\n5. Gateway validation before `activate_customer`.\n6. Independent profile validation under `profile_authority_lock`, before recovery or activation writes.\n7. Version-3 prepared/committed audit fields binding evidence, inventory, and subscription hashes.\n8. Runtime validation of those committed fields.\n9. Activation-journal binding in the membership hash chain before bootstrap reaches `ACTIVE`.\n\nMissing, stale, tampered, unknown, member/admin/creator/restricted, API-error, identity-overlap, inventory mismatch, or deployment mismatch paths fail closed.\n\n**Changed files**\n\nHermes:\n\n- `gateway/platforms/telegram_staff_membership_gate.py`\n- `gateway/platforms/telegram.py`\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_activation_cutover.py`\n- `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_admin.py`\n- `tests/gateway/test_telegram_staff_membership_gate.py`\n- `tests/gateway/test_telegram_staff_membership_polling.py`\n- `tests/gateway/test_dualcoach_activation_cutover.py`\n\nProfile package:\n\n- `checkin_cli/staff_membership_evidence.py`\n- `checkin_cli/customer_admin.py`\n- `tests/test_customer_admin.py`\n- `tests/test_staff_membership_activation_gate.py`\n- `tests/test_nutrition_readiness.py`\n- `tests/test_diagnostic_policy_package.py`\n\n**RED**\n\n```text\npytest -q tests/gateway/test_telegram_staff_membership_gate.py\n```\n\nResult: collection RED, `1 error`, because `telegram_staff_membership_gate` did not exist.\n\nNo separate pre-implementation RED run was captured for the profile and cutover seams; their deterministic rejection tests were subsequently added and verified.\n\n**GREEN**\n\n```text\nuv run pytest -q <membership, cutover, polling, reconnect,\nonboarding, admin, controller, and wheel suites>\n```\n\nResult: `174 passed, 1 deselected`.\n\n```text\nPYTHONPATH=. pytest -q tests -p no:cacheprovider\n```\n\nProfile result: `683 passed`.\n\nAdditional combined gateway run: `120 passed`; admin/controller run: `44 passed`.\n\nRuff on every changed Python file: PASS.\n\nBasedpyright on new membership modules, cutover, and focused tests: `0 errors`. Whole `dualcoach_admin.py` retains two pre-existing diagnostics at lines 200 and 407.\n\nProfile wheel reproducibility:\n\n```text\nd52ba2794c144e82d689d0b9dad9213364e5c9100d533067888d7a960b8a0463\nd52ba2794c144e82d689d0b9dad9213364e5c9100d533067888d7a960b8a0463\n```\n\nHermes reproducible-wheel and packaging suites: `8 passed, 1 deselected`.\n\nThe completed `non1:` dispatch rejection remained untouched and the combined onboarding suite passed.\n\n**Remaining integration assumptions**\n\n- The deployed profile must expose its Telegram token through `platforms.telegram.token` or `TELEGRAM_BOT_TOKEN`.\n- The exact deployment receipt must contain the five candidate/core/inventory and wheel hash fields.\n- Gateway restart must occur before activation so the new subscription epoch is armed.\n- The external lifecycle controller must invoke `staff-membership-finalize` and `staff-membership-verify` after disable; no live services, state, network, evidence trees, or configuration were changed here.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":1717503,"turns":111,"tool_calls":150,"output_tokens":62123,"total_tokens":18267766,"generation_ms":1463065,"tokens_per_second":42,"cost_usd":12.795648999999997,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9923515862633526,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9776731313472422}}