{"task_id":"st_01a00ef5","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-17T09:03:09.829Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T06:13:44.569Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"strict-one-use-delivery-implementation","task_summary":"Implement one-use delivery capability","description":"Implement one-use delivery capability","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Implement the strict-rerun one-use approved-draft delivery capability test-first, using completed design task strict-one-use-delivery-design as binding. Work only in `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent`; use apply_patch. Preserve completed membership gate and non1 fix. No plan/evidence/live config/service/state/network/Git. Goal: global adaptive_nutrition delivery_enabled remains false and confers no send authority; exactly one capability bound to exact human-launched candidate and exact approved Telegram review card can authorize at most one provider invocation. Implement dedicated typed capability embedded in existing draft-delivery ledger; launch authorization receipt in dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller; issue-delivery-capability CLI derives all routes/revisions/digests from canonical state and never sends; 10-minute fixed TTL; capability binds candidate/full/core/inventory/manifest/wheel/provider config/profile authorization, customer route, draft/generation/checkin/revision/approval/payload, owner route, card route/message ID/nonce/payload. Persist current approved card projection after edit succeeds. Atomic locked transition must consume capability and reserve unknown_provider_outcome in the same JSON replacement before returning opaque dispatch claim; no provider call unless claim returned. Success/failure/timeout/crash/unknown consume permanently; no auto retry; reconciliation zero provider calls. Legacy rows readable but never authorized. `delivery_enabled=True` without capability fails; false with exact capability can claim once. Disable production operator-console send bypass (`send_draft=None`) while evidence/edit/approve remain. Block adaptive set_persisted_delivery/deliver_latest_once when global false. TDD across nutrition_coaching, Telegram callback, task controller, crash matrix, console; deterministic clock/concurrency/no sleeps. Explicit RED evidence for primary seams, then GREEN focused tests. Keep files focused/types strict, no broad refactor. Run related gateway suites, Ruff, basedpyright errors, and build/reproducibility tests once. Return changed files, state schema/migration, RED/GREEN commands/counts, quality checks, and observable stop proof including capability single winner and zero retry after unknown.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as completing and reporting the strict one-use delivery migration - implementation and behavioral gates are green, with remaining verification blockers called out.\n\nImplemented strict delivery capabilities with:\n\n- Exact launch, owner/customer route, draft/generation/approval/payload, and Telegram-card bindings.\n- Fixed 10-minute TTL.\n- Atomic capability consumption and `unknown_provider_outcome` reservation before provider I/O.\n- No automatic retry or reconciliation provider calls.\n- Legacy ledger readability without legacy authorization.\n- Approved-card persistence only after successful Telegram edit.\n- Production `send_draft` bypass disabled.\n- Global and caller-supplied adaptive delivery flags unable to grant transport authority.\n\nRegression fixes included authoritative approved-card digesting, separating persisted adaptive approval from the global gate, and deterministic candidate-bound membership fixtures.\n\nVerification:\n\n- Required related suite: **522 passed, 0 failed**.\n- Full gateway suite: **8180 passed, 57 skipped, 0 failed** across 368 files.\n- Profile affected suite: **128 passed**.\n- Ruff: **clean**.\n- Controller basedpyright: **0 errors**.\n- Offline build: **passed**; wheel and sdist contain the current production sources.\n- Reproducible-wheel integration: **1 passed**.\n- Capability/controller focused verification: **14 passed**.\n\nRemaining limitations:\n\n- Full profile suite could not collect because locked `typer==0.27.0` was unavailable offline; network remained disabled.\n- Aggregate basedpyright remains red with **1836 errors** across the selected large production/test files. The newly corrected controller is clean, but without a permitted baseline/Git comparison these errors cannot honestly be classified as pre-existing.\n- No `strict-one-use-delivery-design` artifact exists in the searched repository, Richard workspace, or Hermes profile tree. The implementation was audited against the supplied binding requirements instead.\n- `apply_patch` was unavailable; edits used the provided exact-replacement tool.\n- No Git, live service, configuration, provider, or Telegram operations were performed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":3098910,"turns":113,"tool_calls":173,"output_tokens":33644,"total_tokens":16357402,"generation_ms":846442,"tokens_per_second":40,"cost_usd":11.752462000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9859298025919406,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9648601749670633}}