{"task_id":"st_01a00f53","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-17T10:45:36.298Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T09:52:51.992Z","notification":{"run_epoch":2,"notified_epoch":2},"name":"strict-rerun-launch-controller","task_summary":"Prepare and launch strict rehearsal","description":"Prepare and launch strict rehearsal","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: create, seal, dry-run, then execute exactly one strict-rerun launch controller that reaches `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM` with no post-start repair/recovery and no actions beyond one canonical invite. User explicitly authorized strict A rerun. Inputs: final candidate root `.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-final-candidate-st_01a00f35`, candidate 573d19e464c7df2a0dcacddbb915447beb20c97aceb7c1d1306415014d5730d7, core 90b2557..., Hermes wheel b87aeaca..., profile wheel fb48a193..., readiness seal 76df4f..., inventory root 262d345..., observer v7 hash fb9573..., cleanup v6 hash 7b0b70..., immutable retention seal f02a967..., capture harness seal fd973d.... Current baseline verifier is PASS, service inactive/dead, no registry/customer/owner data/jobs/processes.\n\nFirst create append-only one-use launch controller/evidence under `.omo/evidence/task26` via apply_patch. It must enforce this order and fail/rollback before any invite on mismatch: (1) verify final candidate seal/inventories/wheel bytes and all pre-review READY receipts; (2) verify clean empty baseline, no stale processes/timers/receipts, config delivery_enabled=false activation=false delivery=false, unrelated profile baseline; (3) archive any unexpected live bytes and abort, never delete by hand; (4) canonically prepare a new logical customer lifecycle reusing Telegram actor 8527916639, with a new unique customer/session lineage and no restored historical session bytes, initially disabled/not activated; prepare invite payload but do not send; (5) deploy/install exact Hermes and profile wheel bytes using existing supported deployment semantics, prove service imports/loaded bytes match both wheels; (6) start gateway under monitor, arm ChatMember subscription epoch and observer v7 before snapshot/actions; (7) enumerate complete staff inventory, perform fresh read-only getChatMember preflight for customer requiring left/kicked and private-DM identity separation, bind membership receipt to candidate/wheels/config/registry/bootstrap/session; no membership mutation; (8) run provider readiness read-only/authorized probe as required without customer content; (9) verify observer reports READY and candidate/config remain unchanged; (10) send exactly one canonical bootstrap invite to customer DM and persist provider receipt/idempotency; (11) stop at READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM, emitting exact human handoff. No activation, claim on user's behalf, onboarding answers, delivery capability issuance, draft, owner action, or coaching delivery.\n\nController must be one-use, mode0600 receipts, complete-write atomic persistence, O_NOFOLLOW, fsync, hash bindings, event subscriptions before actions, no raw tokens/answers/provider content, deterministic tests including order violations, crash before/after each boundary, duplicate invocation, invite unknown outcome, rollback/fail-closed, no second invite. Dry-run PASS with zero mutations required before execute. If any source/config/candidate defect appears after start, abort/archive cleanly rather than patch. Preserve plan/ledger/todo/Git and unrelated profiles. Return controller/root/seal, tests/dry-run, exact commands, new customer/session IDs, deployment and membership receipts, service/observer state, exactly-one invite message ID, and exact first user instruction. Observable stop: READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM or hard blocker with clean rollback; no partial claim.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as completing v5 once - it passed credential/network preflight, then failed closed before customer preparation.\n\n**Outcome: `HARD_BLOCKER_CLEAN_ROLLBACK`**\n\n- Controller SHA: `6092ac021c73987f8d0b065ff6e98cf32296aa72b7bf37ff7aed71c19e831e84`\n- Controller seal SHA: `04611ded095935757c829f1e2785e3b671489178b6b0052c97931f0b1d727c44`\n- Permission SHA: `ccf3496361ad4b591de3405a77b3e69323a0653070fd036bfee81176fd53ec88`\n- Run seal SHA: `ba8226e9e7cc036560070d43e2d90a4c7bd56345fc0dc2148ea1a69ba986b1f9`\n- Tests: `35 passed`\n- Diagnostics: clean\n- Dry-run: `PASS_ZERO_MUTATIONS`\n\nV4 bindings verified:\n\n- Controller seal: `99c2343645e5238568d1263a347587461d48edead1f3ce30aa9d804cee9b7c0e`\n- Run seal: `8f9111b2ac21ac1ae1fb3f0af50bd1ff9b522e3db14cf1cf886b13cb2ab9f4b0`\n\nSecret resolution and network preflight:\n\n- Resolver: `hermes_cli.env_loader.load_hermes_dotenv`\n- Bootstrap: `gateway.config.load_gateway_config`\n- Literal config token: absent\n- Credential resolved: `PASS`\n- Credential stored or printed: no\n- Secret-absence proof SHA: `1d67beea46c574c7ba99863c8574787ff71ebdc35c08ae4cf48131af1a0bafdd`\n- Bot identity: `8869235296` / `dual_coach_pilot_test_bot`\n- `get_me` and bot-admin membership checks: `PASS_READ_ONLY`\n\nNew blocker: the authoritative gateway configuration bootstrap created a profile `sessions` authority before baseline/customer preparation. The strict baseline rejected it and archived it during rollback.\n\nFinal state:\n\n- V5 one-use marker consumed\n- Customer/session lineage: not created\n- Service never started\n- Observer never started\n- Membership/provider checks not reached\n- Invite API calls: `0`\n- Invite message ID: none\n- Service: `inactive/dead`, `MainPID=0`\n- Live customer authorities: zero\n- Candidate verifier: `PASS`\n- No source, candidate, or config repair performed\n\nEvidence root:\n\n```text\n.omo/evidence/task26/task26-strict-launch-controller-v5-st_01a00f53/run-20260817-strict-a-v5\n```\n\nNo READY handoff exists because `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM` was not reached.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":350376,"turns":21,"tool_calls":40,"output_tokens":15812,"total_tokens":2180065,"generation_ms":336651,"tokens_per_second":47,"cost_usd":2.395273,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9809215378202456,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.913874671768966}}