{"task_id":"st_01a01262","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T01:00:41.298Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T10:02:46.580Z","notification":{"run_epoch":5,"notified_epoch":5},"name":"strict-onboarding-successor-deploy","task_summary":"Seal and deploy onboarding successor","description":"Seal and deploy onboarding successor","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: produce and deploy one fully verified standard-installed successor candidate containing the confirmed onboarding/package-origin fix, then reach a fresh `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`; no post-start repair. Work in `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent` and evidence repo `/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach`.\n\nSource delta from strict product candidate dac4e812 is limited to the existing strict safeguards plus new changes in `gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime.py`, `gateway/platforms/dualcoach_activation_cutover.py`, and their two tests. First verify the exact diff and that no unrelated agent changes are overwritten. Run changed diagnostics via project `ty`, ruff, compileall, focused 462-domain suite, all related bootstrap/onboarding/activation/checkin suites, full tests/gateway, and build wheel. Preserve exact profile wheel unless profile source changed (it should not). Seal new full candidate/product digest with inventory, wheel hashes, test receipts, candidate lineage from b6d78bc1 and dac4e812, and zero unindexed source. No Git commit.\n\nCreate a NEW isolated venv/runtime path with standard offline installation of the new Hermes wheel and preserved profile wheel; verify direct_url, RECORD parity, import origins, pip check, help smoke and installed-wheel focused tests. Do not patch the old venv. Before live mutation: archive and cleanly rollback current v3 partial AWAITING_ACTIVATION lineage/service/observer via supported cleanup APIs; preserve v3 consent/error evidence; prove empty baseline and config flags false.\n\nThen use the existing minimal launcher shape only (no controller generations) for a fresh one-use v4: provider readiness before mutation; prepare new unique disabled customer/session; start sealed lifecycle observer updated/bound to successor candidate; start transient gateway from the NEW isolated venv with exact `DUALCOACH_PROFILE_PACKAGE=<new venv site-packages>`; verify systemd environment; membership left/private separation; exactly one fresh invite; stop at READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM. Add only necessary deterministic deployment regression if launcher hardcodes old paths/digest. Do not click Start or send onboarding answers. On any failure clean rollback and report. Return successor candidate/product digests, runtime path, tests/counts, parity, v3 cleanup proof, v4 run/customer/session/invite message ID, service+observer IDs/PIDs/env, and exact user action. Observable stop READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM or clean rollback.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a fail-closed v6 teardown - completed via the supported launcher cleanup path and verified the clean baseline.\n\n- v6 gateway and observer: `inactive/dead`, PID `0`\n- Authorities: empty\n- Activation/delivery flags: all `false`\n- Both rejected callbacks preserved: `629525165`, `629525166`\n- Workflow, outbox, receipts, and logs archived\n- No recovery, invite, owner action, or source/candidate/runtime change performed\n\nEvidence:\n\n`/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-onboarding-package-origin-successor-st_01a01262/deployment/v6-bug-cleanup-archive/V6_BUG_CLEAN_BASELINE.json`","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":165323,"turns":10,"tool_calls":15,"output_tokens":6136,"total_tokens":750924,"generation_ms":124038,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":0.7699719999999999,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9630878221570783,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9362986514283259}}