{"task_id":"st_01a01300","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T03:50:39.961Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T11:03:08.915Z","notification":{"run_epoch":1,"notified_epoch":1},"name":"v6-owner-publication","task_summary":"Trace owner review publication","description":"Trace owner review publication","agent_type":"explore","tool_allow":["read","find","grep","ls","bash","lsp_diagnostics","lsp_goto_definition","lsp_find_references","lsp_symbols"],"requested_model":{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-luna","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-luna","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"high"}],"fallback_attempts":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-flash","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"low","reasoning":"low"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.4-mini","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.4-mini","source":"agent","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Read-only runtime investigation. Determine whether attestation persisted, owner review publication was attempted, and if owner card receipt/outbox/emergency receipt exists. Locate actual outbox paths from code, inspect current v6 files and owner address authority. Distinguish no callback from persisted-but-publication-failed. No edits/network. Return exact state/receipts and failure point.","instructions":"You are a codebase search specialist. Your job: find files and code, return actionable results.\n\n## Your Mission\n\nAnswer questions like:\n- \"Where is X implemented?\"\n- \"Which files contain Y?\"\n- \"Find the code that does Z\"\n\n## CRITICAL: What You Must Deliver\n\nEvery response MUST include:\n\n### 1. Intent Analysis (Required)\nBefore ANY search, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags:\n\n<analysis>\n**Literal Request**: [What they literally asked]\n**Actual Need**: [What they're really trying to accomplish]\n**Success Looks Like**: [What result would let them proceed immediately]\n</analysis>\n\n### 2. Parallel Execution (Required)\nLaunch **3+ tools simultaneously** in your first action. Never sequential unless output depends on prior result.\n\n### 3. Structured Results (Required)\nAlways end with this exact format:\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /absolute/path/to/file1.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n- /absolute/path/to/file2.ts - [why this file is relevant]\n</files>\n\n<answer>\n[Direct answer to their actual need, not just file list]\n[If they asked \"where is auth?\", explain the auth flow you found]\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\n[What they should do with this information]\n[Or: \"Ready to proceed - no follow-up needed\"]\n</next_steps>\n</results>\n\n## Success Criteria\n\n- **Paths** - ALL paths must be **absolute** (start with /)\n- **Completeness** - Find ALL relevant matches, not just the first one\n- **Actionability** - Caller can proceed **without asking follow-up questions**\n- **Intent** - Address their **actual need**, not just literal request\n\n## Failure Conditions\n\nYour response has **FAILED** if:\n- Any path is relative (not absolute)\n- You missed obvious matches in the codebase\n- Caller needs to ask \"but where exactly?\" or \"what about X?\"\n- You only answered the literal question, not the underlying need\n- No <results> block with structured output\n\n## Constraints\n\n- **Read-only**: You cannot create, modify, or delete files\n- **No emojis**: Keep output clean and parseable\n- **No file creation**: Report findings as message text, never write files\n\n## Tool Strategy\n\nUse the right tool for the job:\n- **Semantic search** (definitions, references): LSP tools (lsp_goto_definition, lsp_find_references, lsp_symbols, lsp_diagnostics)\n- **Structural patterns** (function shapes, class structures): combine LSP symbols/references with focused grep and read calls\n- **Text patterns** (strings, comments, logs): grep\n- **File patterns** (find by name/extension): find\n- **Remote evidence**: use the structured read-only bash broker only for supported gh or HTTPS retrieval requests; it is not a general shell\n\nFlood with parallel calls. Cross-validate findings across multiple tools."},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a runtime/state investigation - I checked the v6 launcher, current profile files, and the publication outbox code to pin down what persisted, what was published, and where it stopped.\n\n<results>\n<files>\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-onboarding-package-origin-successor-st_01a01262/deployment/v6/launch_v6.py - v6 launcher; shows the exact invite publication flow and receipt events.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-onboarding-package-origin-successor-st_01a01262/deployment/v6/receipt.jsonl - current v6 execution receipt; contains CLAIMED/READY/INVITE_INTENT/INVITE_RESULT/READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM.\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-customer-bootstrap-v1/ledger.json - persisted bootstrap/session state; shows consent attempt count, owner id, and null card receipt.\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1/ledger.json - persisted publication outbox ledger; actual outbox records.\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1/owner-callbacks.json - owner callback receipt ledger; currently empty.\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/data/onboarding/telegram-publication-outbox-v1/emergency.json - emergency receipt ledger; currently empty.\n- /home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/customers/registry.json - owner authority source; owner user/chat id is bound here.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-certification-deployment-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb-st_01a00b39/artifacts/installed-hermes/gateway/platforms/telegram_nutrition_onboarding_publication_outbox.py - actual outbox path definitions: ledger/emergency/owner-callbacks/locks/receipt-key.\n- /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-certification-deployment-4a6c7ee54cf9526a30de8bb576c1d71b411938beba33a04914738f6e1b6ed1cb-st_01a00b39/artifacts/installed-hermes/gateway/platforms/telegram_customer_bootstrap.py - consent publication state machine; shows consent_publication_attempt and consent_card_message_id binding/reconciliation.\n</files>\n\n<answer>\nExact state:\n\n- v6 launcher succeeded through `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`.\n- Invite publication was attempted and completed exactly once:\n  - `INVITE_INTENT`\n  - `INVITE_RESULT` with `message_id: 244`\n  - `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM`\n- So the v6 owner-facing invite publication did not fail.\n\nPersisted bootstrap/session state:\n- `state: AWAITING_ACTIVATION`\n- `generation: 5`\n- `consent_publication_attempt: 1`\n- `consent_card_message_id: null`\n- `owner_id: 8693203710`\n- `role_claims` includes customer claim `message_id: 245`\n\nOwner authority:\n- `/home/cube/.hermes/profiles/dualcoachtest/customers/registry.json`\n  - `owner.user_id = 8693203710`\n  - `owner.chat_id = 8693203710`\n  - `owner.topic_id = 0`\n\nOutbox / receipts:\n- Outbox ledger exists and is populated.\n- `owner-callbacks.json` exists but is empty: `{\"records\":[]}`.\n- `emergency.json` exists but is empty: `{\"records\":[]}`.\n- There is no bound consent card receipt (`consent_card_message_id` is still null).\n\nDistinction:\n- This is not \"no callback because nothing persisted\".\n- It is \"persisted bootstrap state with one publication attempt, but no bound consent receipt/callback\".\n- The failure point is the consent publication/reconciliation path: the session advanced to `consent_publication_attempt = 1`, but never reached a non-null `consent_card_message_id` binding in `telegram_customer_bootstrap.py`.\n</answer>\n\n<next_steps>\nReady to proceed - no follow-up needed\n</next_steps>\n</results>","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":155000,"turns":16,"tool_calls":57,"output_tokens":9291,"total_tokens":1614922,"generation_ms":146647,"tokens_per_second":63,"cost_usd":0.27385994999999996,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9867715238703287,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8970031096808669}}