{"task_id":"st_01a01327","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T04:34:39.722Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T11:03:08.984Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"clarification-policy-architecture","task_summary":"Design schema-governed clarification policy","description":"Design schema-governed clarification policy","category":"architect","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"xhigh","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: inspect authoritative fixed profile source `/home/cube/.cache/task26-strict-successor-1786976146/src-p` and design a root-level clarification mechanism for all 22 nutrition onboarding fields. Current defect: LLM/provider reconciliation can emit mandatory clarifications; latest patch special-cases `equation_sex_basis` via exact phrase normalization and filters its clarification, which the user correctly rejects as symptom-level. Deliver a concrete minimal architecture where deterministic schema/business rules own question eligibility and the model is advisory-only. Enumerate all 22 fields by contract, current parser/canonicalization, valid/ambiguous/conflicting/safety-required states, cross-field contradictions, privacy constraints, reason codes, dedupe/cap/order, persistence/digest semantics, and exact test seams. Identify current code/files/call graph and migration impact. No edits, no live state, no git/plan/todo. Stop with decision-ready design and risks/evidence paths.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are a big-picture system design consultant, NOT an implementer.\n\n<Method>\n1. Survey the WHOLE architecture end to end before proposing anything: module boundaries, data flow, ownership, and the blast radius of the area in question.\n2. Produce at least TWO viable designs and state the trade-offs of each in concrete terms (coupling, testability, migration cost, failure modes).\n3. Recommend ONE of them with the reasoning that decided it, the boundaries it assumes, and the risks it carries.\n4. Demand the SIMPLEST architecture that handles the actual requirements. Reject enterprise patterns that do not pay for themselves.\n</Method>\n\n<Advisory_Mode>\nWhen the caller marks the task advisory-only, produce NO file edits: return the analysis, options, recommendation, and risks as structured text.\n</Advisory_Mode>\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as architecture finalization - I’ll convert the red-team BLOCKs into one recommended design and a pass/fail rehearsal evidence gate.\n\n## Verdict: NO-GO / BLOCKED\n\nCandidate `573d19e...d5730d7` is not eligible for another live run:\n\n- Observer v7 writes a `SUBSCRIBED` declaration, then sleeps until timeout; it observes no lifecycle events.\n- Launch evidence terminates at `READY_CUSTOMER_CLAIM` after sending the invite.\n- Preview uses isolated in-memory state and cannot prove profile persistence.\n- Reconciliation publication can use the transient provider result instead of the committed filtered record.\n- `op_rev` binds to `QUESTION_FIELDS[0]`, not the clarification being revised.\n- Approval edits Telegram before the approved-card projection is safely persisted.\n- Cleanup v6 has `execution_permission: false`; its inherited cleanup/rollback paths can compete or reverse each other.\n\nAny correction changes the candidate digest, so all current dry-run receipts become predecessor evidence only.\n\n## Architecture decision\n\n### Recommended: one root lifecycle aggregate with immutable blobs and transactional outboxes\n\nCreate one private, candidate-bound lifecycle aggregate per rehearsal:\n\n```text\ndata/lifecycles/<lifecycle_id>/\n  aggregate.json\n  aggregate.lock\n  blobs/sha256/<digest>\n```\n\n`aggregate.json` is the sole phase authority and contains:\n\n- Candidate, customer, session, actor and route bindings.\n- Monotonic aggregate revision.\n- Current phase.\n- Digests of immutable onboarding, reconciliation, baseline, check-in, draft, approval, delivery and cleanup blobs.\n- Pending external side-effect intents and their attempts/receipts.\n- Transition history and hash-chain head.\n- Holds and exact deterministic reason codes.\n\nEach transition follows:\n\n1. Write an immutable content-addressed blob.\n2. Lock and CAS the expected aggregate revision.\n3. Atomically reference the blob, change phase, and enqueue any side-effect intent.\n4. `fsync` file and directory.\n5. Notify observers after the commit.\n\nAn unreferenced blob is inert and collectible. Existing domain files become recoverable projections of the aggregate, not independent phase authorities.\n\n### Rejected alternative: patch the six individual paths\n\nLocally fixing publication, `op_rev`, projection recovery, observer and cleanup would be smaller, but would preserve independent ledgers and cross-file split-brain windows. It cannot strongly prove one revision-bound lifecycle from invite to cleanup.\n\n## Canonical lifecycle\n\n```text\nPREPARED\n-> OBSERVER_READY\n-> INVITE_INTENT\n-> INVITE_RECEIPTED | INVITE_UNKNOWN\n-> CUSTOMER_INGRESS_COMMITTED\n-> ONBOARDING_COLLECTING\n-> RECONCILIATION_COMMITTED\n-> CUSTOMER_ATTESTED\n-> OWNER_APPROVED\n-> READY\n-> ACTIVATION_INTENT\n-> ACTIVE\n-> CHECKIN_COMMITTED_AND_GENERATION_QUEUED\n-> GENERATING\n-> DRAFT_READY\n-> APPROVED_CARD_PENDING\n-> APPROVED_CARD_PROJECTED\n-> DELIVERY_CAPABILITY_ISSUED\n-> DELIVERY_ATTEMPTED\n-> DELIVERY_RECEIPTED | DELIVERY_UNKNOWN\n-> SENT_AUDITED\n-> CLEANUP_PREPARED\n-> ARCHIVED\n-> DISABLED\n-> QUIESCED\n-> CLEANUP_COMPLETE\n-> SEALED\n```\n\nUnknown invite or delivery outcomes prohibit blind retry.\n\n## Deterministic clarification compiler\n\nKeep the previously recommended 22-entry `FIELD_SPECS` registry. The compiler exclusively owns:\n\n- Parsing and canonicalization.\n- Field and cross-field validation.\n- Clarification eligibility and reason codes.\n- Dedupe, ordering and display cap.\n- Fixed Korean question templates.\n- Holds and state transitions.\n\nThe model may return advisory analysis, but its questions and prose are never persisted as mandatory clarifications or published.\n\nThe authoritative reconciliation v2 digest binds:\n\n```text\ncanonical answers\npolicy/schema digest\nrestriction-KB digest\nreference date\nplanned_starts_on\nall deterministic issues\nvisible issue IDs\nhold decisions\n```\n\nIt excludes provider prose and advisory output. `planned_starts_on` must be fixed before reconciliation and attestation.\n\nAfter every revised answer, recompute the complete issue set. The three-question cap limits presentation only; it never discards unresolved issues.\n\n## Exact 22-answer golden fixture\n\nFixed dates:\n\n- `reference_date`: `2026-08-18`\n- `planned_starts_on`: `2026-08-24`\n\n| Field | Exact customer answer | Canonical value |\n|---|---|---|\n| `date_of_birth` | `1990년 1월 15일입니다.` | `1990-01-15`, age 36 |\n| `equation_sex_basis` | `네, 남성입니다.` | `male` |\n| `height_cm` | `키는 180cm입니다.` | `\"180\"` |\n| `weight_kg` | `현재 체중은 80kg입니다.` | `\"80\"` |\n| `activity_category` | `보통 활동량입니다.` | `moderate` |\n| `activity_rationale` | `주 3회 60분 근력 운동을 하고 평일에는 하루 8천 보 정도 걷습니다.` | normalized text |\n| `goal_type` | `현재 체중을 유지하고 싶습니다.` | `maintain` |\n| `target_weight_kg` | `유지가 목표라 목표 체중은 정하지 않겠습니다.` | `null` |\n| `target_date` | `유지가 목표라 목표 날짜도 정하지 않겠습니다.` | `null` |\n| `allergies` | `음식 알레르기는 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `intolerances` | `음식 불내증은 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `religious_ethical_exclusions` | `종교적 또는 윤리적으로 제외하는 음식은 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `disliked_foods` | `싫어해서 피하는 음식은 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `dietary_preferences` | `특별한 식단 선호는 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `conditions` | `진단받은 질환은 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `medications` | `복용 중인 약이나 보충제는 없습니다.` | `none, []` |\n| `pregnancy_breastfeeding` | `임신 또는 수유에 해당하지 않습니다.` | `false` |\n| `eating_disorder_risk` | `섭식장애 위험이나 과거력은 없습니다.` | `false` |\n| `cooking_access` | `가스레인지, 전자레인지, 냉장고를 사용할 수 있고 기본 조리가 가능합니다.` | normalized text |\n| `budget_band` | `식비 예산은 보통입니다.` | `보통` |\n| `meal_count` | `하루 세 끼를 먹습니다.` | `3` |\n| `schedule_constraints` | `평일 점심은 12시, 저녁은 운동 후 8시쯤이며 그 외 제약은 없습니다.` | normalized text |\n\nExpected compiler result:\n\n```text\nclarification issues: 0\nvisible questions: 0\nsafety holds: 0\nhuman-review requirements: 0\n```\n\n## Six red-team corrections\n\n1. **Observer**\n   - Install an actual inotify/application-event subscription before reading the initial aggregate revision.\n   - Persist watcher identity, starting revision and cursor in readiness evidence.\n   - Block on the event descriptor with a bounded deadline; no sleeps or polling.\n   - Replay committed aggregate revisions to close notification races.\n\n2. **Launcher**\n   - Invite receipt means only `INVITE_RECEIPTED`.\n   - Golden-path PASS requires a Telegram update entering the production adapter and committing `CUSTOMER_INGRESS_COMMITTED`.\n   - Preview or direct service calls cannot satisfy this transition.\n\n3. **Reconciliation publication**\n   - Commit reconciliation and publication intent in one aggregate transition.\n   - Publisher accepts only a reconciliation digest, reloads the committed blob, and renders that record.\n   - The transient provider object is discarded after advisory storage.\n\n4. **Revision binding**\n   - Bind revision operations to:\n     `lifecycle_id + issue_id + exact field + answers_digest_before + reconciliation_digest`.\n   - Remove every use of `QUESTION_FIELDS[0]`.\n   - CAS the current issue and recompute the compiler after the revision.\n\n5. **Approved-card projection**\n   - Approval atomically creates `APPROVED_CARD_PENDING`.\n   - The projector edits the exact Telegram message.\n   - Success or Telegram’s exact “not modified” response commits `APPROVED_CARD_PROJECTED`.\n   - Edit failure remains recoverable pending/unknown; no capability can be issued.\n   - Restart retries the same idempotent edit, never sends a replacement customer message.\n\n6. **Cleanup**\n   - One lock, one monotonic cleanup journal and one controller.\n   - Archive first; then freeze ingress, disable customer and delivery, reconcile outboxes, stop owned processes, seal, and prune only permitted transient data.\n   - Failure resumes forward from its committed phase. It never re-enables the customer or restores delivery.\n   - A concurrent cleanup returns the current phase or existing receipt.\n\nTo remove the current circular seal dependency:\n\n1. Observer produces pre-cleanup lifecycle and membership seals.\n2. Cleanup archives, disables and quiesces.\n3. Observer records `CLEANUP_COMPLETE` and produces final seals.\n4. Cleanup verifies immutable publication, prunes ephemeral state, and writes its terminal receipt.\n\n## One-pass automated rehearsal\n\nRun against the newly sealed installed wheels and an ephemeral profile. Use the production Telegram/runtime handlers and real profile persistence. Fake only external Telegram/provider I/O, preserving their receipt and unknown-outcome contracts.\n\nSequence:\n\n1. Subscribe observer and await its readiness event.\n2. Persist invite intent and fake Telegram invite receipt.\n3. Feed a serialized Start update through the actual adapter.\n4. Feed consent plus the exact 22 messages above through adapter ingress.\n5. Return adversarial provider advisory containing fabricated DOB and sex-basis questions.\n6. Assert committed reconciliation has zero issues and publication contains none of that text.\n7. Attest, owner-approve, finalize, and explicitly activate.\n8. Submit one complete daily nutrition check-in through the real wizard:\n   `80 kg`, `2200 kcal`, `C220/P150/F80`, three meals, `2.5 L`, `7.5 h`, sleep/condition `4`, normal digestion, low stress, 60-minute strength session, no note.\n9. Prove check-in and unique generation job commit together.\n10. Generate one draft, approve it and project the approved card.\n11. Issue one capability, consume it before transport, record one delivery receipt, and reach `SENT_AUDITED`.\n12. Replay the send callback and prove transport count remains one.\n13. Execute cleanup to final immutable seals and verify no active residual state.\n\nTests subscribe to exact commit signals before triggering operations and await them with bounded timeouts. Fixed sleeps are forbidden.\n\n## Mandatory adversarial branches\n\nThe same test invocation must also prove:\n\n- Provider-invented questions never become authoritative or visible.\n- Ambiguous height such as `180 또는 185cm` produces only the schema-owned fixed issue.\n- Goal-direction conflict is deterministic.\n- Conditions, medication, pregnancy or eating-disorder risk produce a hold, not a sensitive clarification.\n- Stale answer/reconciliation digests mutate nothing.\n- A later-field revision records that exact field, never `date_of_birth`.\n- Crash after reconciliation commit recovers publication from the committed record.\n- Provider generation failure creates no draft.\n- Telegram card-edit failure blocks capability issuance and recovers after restart.\n- Unknown delivery consumes capability and prohibits another send.\n- Cleanup failure remains truthfully incomplete and resumes forward.\n- Two cleanup callers create one archive and one receipt.\n- Preview output cannot satisfy any acceptance transition.\n\n## Minimum evidence bundle\n\n1. **`candidate-seal.json`**  \n   New candidate digest, source/wheel/inventory/config/harness digests and installed-byte proof.\n\n2. **`fixture-manifest.private.json`**  \n   Exact 22 inputs, dates, canonical map and expected digests; mode `0600`. Public evidence exposes only its digest.\n\n3. **`observer-subscription.json`**  \n   Watcher identity, subscribed directory/source, start revision and readiness commit preceding invite intent.\n\n4. **`lifecycle-events.jsonl` plus final seal**  \n   Hash-chained actual revisions from invite through cleanup. Each row carries artifact and receipt digests but no raw health text.\n\n5. **`transport-receipts.json`**  \n   Invite receipt, card-edit receipt, capability issuance/consumption, exactly one customer delivery receipt and replay count.\n\n6. **`adversarial-matrix.json`**  \n   One independently verifiable result for every branch above, including before/after aggregate revisions.\n\n7. **`cleanup-receipt.json` and archive manifest**  \n   Exact retained, archived, deleted, still-present and not-delivered sets; disabled registry proof; empty pending jobs/outboxes; owned-process exit; final lifecycle and membership seals; immutable-retention publication digest.\n\n8. **`independent-verification.json`**  \n   Recomputes every digest and transition. It must reject declarations such as `PASS_DRY_RUN` unless backed by the corresponding committed artifact and receipt.\n\n## Final-live-run gate\n\nA final live request is permitted only when:\n\n- The complete automated rehearsal passes once.\n- Related tests, full build and independent verifier pass against the same candidate digest.\n- Cleanup finishes as `SEALED`, with no unexplained residue.\n- The evidence bundle proves zero provider-controlled clarification fields and exactly one delivery.\n\nNo live run should be requested now. No files, state, Telegram operations or tests were changed or executed during this architecture review.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":877965,"turns":25,"tool_calls":109,"output_tokens":42298,"total_tokens":2640680,"generation_ms":812309,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":4.991858000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7927148510111293}}