{"task_id":"st_01a0136b","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T05:50:22.111Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T12:12:40.740Z","notification":{"run_epoch":11,"notified_epoch":11},"name":"artifact-driven-golden-path","task_summary":"Build real artifact-driven Golden Path","description":"Build real artifact-driven Golden Path","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: third/final attempt to build and run an ACTUAL artifact-driven one-pass Golden Path. Replace the fail-closed AST preflight in `/home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent/scripts/source_golden_path.py` and harden `verify_source_golden_path.py`. Use profile source `/home/cube/.cache/task26-strict-successor-1786976146/src-p`, new `gateway.commit_observer.ProductionCommitObserver`, `telegram_customer_surface_receipts`, and profile `customer_cleanup` APIs. No live Telegram/provider/services/dualcoachtest/Git/plan/todo/current evidence. Isolated private temp profile only; fake adapters may log raw external calls but never lifecycle states/PASS.\n\nThis is the final approach. Hard rules:\n- No phase declaration may be emitted by the harness. Phase acceptance is derived by the verifier from production-owned artifacts that the driver actually created.\n- No generic JUnit, fixed JSON count, copied payload, or self-authored phase/PASS can prove a transition.\n- `SOURCE_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS` exists only as verifier output after reading/recomputing actual artifacts.\n- If any production API cannot be driven, stop fail-closed with exact API/artifact blocker and do not create a PASS bundle.\n\nDrive one isolated profile sequentially through real production operations identified by the independent audit:\n1 subscription armed before mutation using ProductionCommitObserver; 2 RoomBootstrapStore prepare+claim from serialized Start; 3 bootstrap registration+consent callback+runtime start; 4 22 `handle_text`/submit_answer messages; 5 deterministic committed reconciliation with malicious provider; 6 actual attest callback/baseline; 7 owner outbox publication; 8 owner_ok/finalization/readiness disabled; 9 activate_customer_cutover/registry+bootstrap ACTIVE; 10 production nutrition daily wizard/finalization and unique generation request; 11 DraftGenerationWorker/create_draft; 12 approve_draft; 13 persist approved card; 14 issue capability; 15 claim capability before transport; 16 one fake Telegram customer call + production receipt/delivered/sent_audited; 17 production customer surface receipt; 18 pause/withdraw; 19 archive_customer_cleanup/resume and post_cleanup_authority_inventory terminal.\n\nReuse existing real fixture builders/public APIs from tests, but do not mock the domain under test or write ledgers directly. It is acceptable for the driver to invoke public production methods synchronously with fake external I/O. The same invocation must exercise required adversarial cases against the same APIs: malicious/unavailable provider, ambiguous height, sensitive hold, stale digest/callback, later issue exact binding, restart committed publication, projection failure blocks capability, stray second awaiting row blocks, stale/wrong/expired capability, unknown send no retry, cleanup fault/resume, concurrent cleanup one winner, preview cannot satisfy production.\n\nVerifier must directly open exact profile artifacts (bootstrap ledger, registry, onboarding workflow/baseline/session/outbox, readiness/projection/activation, check-in events/finalization/generation/drafts/deliveries, raw fake call log, surface receipt, archive manifest/journal/inventory, observer receipts), recompute their native digests/HMAC/chain/cardinality/bindings, enforce one customer/session/candidate lineage, and securely open/hash source provenance. Reject 21 fully forged envelopes with internally valid hashes and no ledgers, nonexistent provenance, candidate substitution, cross-customer splice, synthetic publication/activation, duplicate finalization, generation splice, capability reuse, hidden duplicate transport, receipt mismatch, false cleanup, self-authored PASS, symlink/world-readable/substitution.\n\nTest-first: add verifier attack tests proving current verifier accepts forged bundle (RED), then harden; add one driver integration test. Subscribe to exact events before mutations, bounded waits, no sleeps/polling. Run actual driver once to CLEANUP_COMPLETE, verifier twice, tamper attacks, focused/related tests, ruff, ty, compileall. Evidence bundle private 0700/files0600; keep successful bundle path for lead inspection. Return exact production APIs invoked, artifact paths/schemas, counts/digests, test commands, bundle, and any blocker. Observable stop `ACTUAL_SOURCE_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS` or exact fail-closed blocker. Never synthesize success.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as correcting one stale integration test - updated behaviorally with no production or driver changes.\n\nThe renamed test now asserts:\n\n- Driver exits `0`\n- Output profile, operation ID, and tree digest bind to the bundle\n- Bundle exists with mode `0700`\n- Native verifier exits `0`\n- Status is `ACTUAL_SOURCE_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`\n- Operation and candidate digests match driver output\n- Terminal inventory reports `terminal: true`\n\nMalformed/prepared activation-journal coverage remains unchanged in cleanup tests.\n\nResults:\n\n- Complete verifier test file: `40 passed`\n- Ruff: passed\n- ty: passed","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":54218,"turns":5,"tool_calls":6,"output_tokens":1635,"total_tokens":1011090,"generation_ms":50020,"tokens_per_second":33,"cost_usd":0.5781810000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9965949017153614,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9946277942057843}}