{"task_id":"st_01a0139e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T06:46:09.593Z","updated_at":"2026-08-19T12:12:41.224Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"shared-ledger-cleanup-repair","task_summary":"Fix shared-ledger customer cleanup isolation","description":"Fix shared-ledger customer cleanup isolation","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Goal: test-first fix the exact production cleanup blocker exposed by the actual Golden Path. Work in profile source `/home/cube/.cache/task26-strict-successor-1786976146/src-p`; preserve unrelated changes. No harness/Gateway/live/services/dualcoachtest/Git/plan/todo/evidence edits. Use programming/debugging discipline.\n\nExact blocker: `archive_customer_cleanup` rejects required profile-level shared artifact `data/owner-actions/draft-generations.json` with `CleanupIntegrityError: candidate path is not customer-scoped`. Do NOT relax `_candidate_relative` or archive/delete the entire shared file: that would leak/delete other customers.\n\nRoot contract:\n- Keep existing `candidate_paths` strict for whole-file customer-scoped authorities.\n- Add an explicit typed supported shared-ledger projection input/API. For each supported shared authority, securely open private regular no-hardlink/no-symlink file, parse its native schema, select only records bound to exact `customer_key`, reject missing/ambiguous customer binding, and fail if selected records contain pending/unknown authority.\n- Archive a customer-filtered canonical projection under the operation archive, never raw shared bytes. Manifest binds source relative path, source byte digest/inode/mode, selector/schema version, selected record count, ordered record digests/projection digest, and projection archive path. No other customer values/records may appear in projection.\n- Preserve shared source ledger in place; terminal audited/history rows are retained history, not residual active authority. Post-cleanup inventory independently reparses the shared ledger and counts only active/pending/unknown customer-bound rows as blockers; terminal sent-audited/generation history is retained and reported separately.\n- Resume/concurrent callers recompute and verify the same projection/source digest. Source mutation between prepared and copy must block; crash resume remains forward-only. Archive verifier validates projection bytes/digests and no foreign customer.\n- Support the real Golden Path shared owner-action ledgers required by its candidate list (at least `draft-generations.json`; inspect driver/source schemas and add only explicit supported files actually needed). Do not make a generic caller-controlled JSON selector that can exfiltrate arbitrary fields.\n\nWrite RED tests first: two-customer shared ledger archives only target rows; foreign values absent; source preserved; terminal target rows allow terminal cleanup/inventory; pending/unknown target rows block; foreign pending rows do not block target; mutation/resume blocks; unsupported shared path rejected; whole-file candidate remains strict. Reproduce exact draft-generations fixture. Implement focused modules <=250 LOC where practical. Run new+cleanup/admin tests, full profile 731+, ruff, ty, compileall, and manual two-customer temp driver. Return files, RED/GREEN, API/schema, test counts/commands. Stop source-ready; do not run Golden Path.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as delivering the source-ready shared-ledger cleanup fix - implementation and verification are complete without running the Golden Path.\n\nImplemented in:\n\n- `checkin_cli/customer_cleanup_shared.py`\n- `checkin_cli/customer_cleanup.py`\n- `checkin_cli/customer_cleanup_inventory.py`\n- `checkin_cli/__init__.py`\n- `tests/test_customer_cleanup_shared_ledgers.py`\n\nAPI:\n\n```python\narchive_customer_cleanup(\n    root,\n    customer_key,\n    shared_ledger_projections=(\n        SharedLedgerProjection.DRAFT_GENERATIONS,\n    ),\n)\n```\n\nContract:\n\n- Whole-file `candidate_paths` remain strict.\n- Only `data/owner-actions/draft-generations.json` is explicitly supported.\n- Shared source is securely opened and preserved.\n- Archive schema: `customer-cleanup-archive-v2`.\n- Projection schema: `customer-cleanup-draft-generations-projection-v1`.\n- Manifest binds source digest/device/inode/mode/size, selector version, record count and ordered digests, projection digest/path.\n- Resume verifies unchanged source and projection.\n- Inventory distinguishes terminal retained history from active/pending/unknown authority.\n- Foreign customer records and pending state do not affect target cleanup.\n\nTest-first result:\n\n- RED: collection failed because `SharedLedgerProjection` did not exist.\n- GREEN:\n  - Shared-ledger tests: **8 passed**\n  - Shared + cleanup + admin: **147 passed**\n  - Full profile: **739 passed**\n  - Ruff: **all checks passed**\n  - Ty on changed cleanup/test surface: **all checks passed**\n  - Compileall: passed\n  - Manual two-customer temporary driver: committed, target-only projection, foreign pending ignored, source preserved.\n\nFull-project Ty still reports pre-existing diagnostics outside this change; changed files are clean. No Golden Path, Git, harness, services, plan, todo, or evidence modifications were made.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":550224,"turns":28,"tool_calls":67,"output_tokens":17558,"total_tokens":2221691,"generation_ms":428539,"tokens_per_second":41,"cost_usd":2.6424450000000004,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9902887478958954,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8978042613580941}}