{"task_id":"st_01a01586","status":"cancelled","residency_state":"disposed","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T15:38:32.509Z","updated_at":"2026-08-18T15:42:37.482Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":-1},"name":"review-objective-2efe939","task_summary":"Review Task26 objective and constraints","description":"Objective review","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Perform an independent GOAL/CONSTRAINT review of Task26 candidate 2efe939a9775dccb71c680d6ce8513c919721dc0dba5535f0f64905e34d3bd82. Read the authoritative plan /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/plans/dualcoach-production-readiness.md, ledger, current source diff in /home/cube/projects/richard/hermes-agent, and immutable evidence bundle /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-closed-choice-installed-st_01a01574. Verify every Task26 objective and strict clarification-root amendment constraint, including natural Korean variants, shared production/preview behavior, zero clarification issues, exact installed candidate, no live action, and cleanup. Do not edit files or run live services. Return exactly one structured review with verdict PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE, requirement-by-requirement evidence, blocking findings, and residual risks. Stop when the objective verdict is evidence-backed.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":4082105,"error_message":"Candidate invalidated by code-quality P1 finding","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":244584,"turns":7,"tool_calls":58,"output_tokens":11849,"total_tokens":731194,"generation_ms":229131,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":1.615939,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9230502086280599,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.7217232343312319}}