{"task_id":"st_01a01598","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T15:58:03.695Z","updated_at":"2026-08-20T09:51:58.722Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-objective-cbbfc12","task_summary":"Review corrected candidate objectives","description":"Objective rereview","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Independently review GOAL/CONSTRAINT completeness for Task26 candidate cbbfc12d1e61c65e5620e4a56b850b0b3d945035a1ab4041c330e50b06fdfe17 only. Read the authoritative plan, ledger, current source diff, and immutable bundle /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-closed-choice-copula-installed-st_01a01574-v2. Verify every strict clarification-root requirement, including shared production/preview parsing, all 22 natural Korean fields, '보통 수준입니다.' and '보통 수준' without re-ask, ambiguous text unresolved, exact installed provenance, lifecycle/exactly-once behavior, and truthful cleanup. Confirm old candidate 2efe939... is excluded. No edits/live actions. Return one PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE report with requirement evidence, blockers, and residual risks.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a strict candidate-completeness audit - I reviewed the authoritative artifacts read-only and found an evidence-contract gap.\n\n## Bottom line\n\n**FAIL.** Candidate `cbbfc12d...` appears functionally correct and has strong installed provenance, but it does not satisfy the plan’s strict requirement that the **same installed Golden Path invocation** prove the complete adversarial matrix. The independent verifier also trusts summary assertions for several of those requirements rather than deriving them from native lifecycle artifacts.\n\n## Requirement evidence\n\n- **Shared production/preview parsing: PASS**\n  - Both flows use `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_copy.parse_answer`.\n  - Production calls it in `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_runtime_collection.py:189,250`.\n  - Preview calls it in `telegram_nutrition_onboarding_preview_flow.py:92`.\n  - Both compile with `compile_clarification_policy`: production publication at line 75 and preview completion at line 122.\n\n- **All 22 natural Korean fields: PASS**\n  - `tools/source_golden_path.py:37-60` contains exactly 22 natural Korean answers.\n  - The production loop requires each answer to advance exactly once and rejects re-asks.\n  - Archived `baseline-v1.json` confirms the complete canonical baseline, including `activity_category=\"moderate\"`.\n\n- **`보통 수준입니다.` and `보통 수준`: PASS**\n  - `_parse_closed_choice` now composes qualifier plus copula, fixing the old parser’s mutually exclusive suffix handling.\n  - Installed/source parser tests explicitly cover both forms.\n  - The installed Golden Path uses `보통 수준입니다.` and records zero issues, holds, clarifications, and re-asks.\n  - Because both forms normalize to the identical `moderate` value before the shared compiler, neither is clarification-eligible.\n\n- **Ambiguous text remains unresolved: PASS**\n  - Exact-choice parsing does not accept substring or contradictory prose.\n  - Tests preserve ambiguous dates, measurements, meal counts, booleans, and activity prose as unresolved input.\n  - Policy tests prove stable issue IDs, canonical fields, fixed copy, ordering, answer-digest binding, and later-field revision binding.\n\n- **Provider authority and sensitive holds: PASS**\n  - Provider output is stored only as advisory digest material.\n  - Production reloads the committed reconciliation before publication.\n  - Sensitive disclosures compile to deterministic holds rather than provider-authored questions.\n\n- **Exact installed provenance: PASS**\n  - Candidate digest independently derives as `cbbfc12d...`.\n  - Wheel hashes match:\n    - Hermes: `1f334e9f...`\n    - Profile: `62c508d3...`\n  - Installed provenance binds wheel paths, wheel hashes, RECORD hashes, installed inventories, interpreter, and 90 loaded modules.\n  - Imports originate from isolated site-packages with `PYTHONPATH` unset.\n  - Current source equals sealed source and wheel bytes: 28,350 Hermes and 89 profile inventory entries, zero drift.\n  - Bundle inventory: 133/133 hashes match; `SEAL.json.sha256` verifies.\n\n- **Happy-path lifecycle/exactly-once/cleanup: PASS**\n  - One installed invocation covers onboarding, attestation, owner review, activation, check-in, generation, approval, capability consumption, one transport call, one surface receipt, duplicate rejection, pause, withdrawal, archive, and resumed cleanup.\n  - Cleanup journal is forward-only: `prepared -> copied_verified -> source_pruned -> committed`.\n  - Terminal counts are all zero; customer is disabled and nonconsenting.\n  - Cleanup truthfully reports no live service, Telegram, profile, or real-customer mutation.\n\n- **Old candidate exclusion: PASS**\n  - `2efe939a...` appears only as explicit invalidation metadata.\n  - New and old Hermes wheels differ in the parser implementation and RECORD.\n  - The new manifest rejects equality with the invalidated digest; no old artifact is used as runtime authority.\n\n## Blockers\n\n1. **Strict same-invocation proof is incomplete.**  \n   The plan at lines 1158-1160 requires one invocation to prove:\n   - genuine ambiguity,\n   - later-field revision isolation,\n   - preview cannot satisfy production acceptance,\n   - approved-card projection failure blocks capability issuance,\n   - unknown delivery is never retried,\n   - resumable terminal cleanup.\n\n   `tools/source_golden_path.py` proves the successful preview/production path, stale attestation, duplicate delivery rejection, and resumable cleanup, but does not execute the ambiguity, later-field revision, failed-card projection, or unknown-delivery branches. Those behaviors exist only in separate pytest suites, such as policy tests and `test_nutrition_coaching.py:6491`.\n\n2. **The independent verifier cannot close that gap.**  \n   `tools/verify_source_golden_path.py` has no checks for preview isolation, unknown-provider outcome, the 22 raw answers, or revision targeting. `tools/independent_verify_candidate.py` accepts several values from `golden-contract-summary.json` rather than deriving them from native artifacts.\n\n3. **Authoritative ledger adoption is absent.**  \n   `.omo/start-work/ledger.jsonl` ends with the 2026-08-16 `e788f5d5...` candidate and contains neither `cbbfc12d...` nor `2efe939a...`. Therefore this bundle is not yet an authoritative Task26 adoption or release verdict.\n\n## Action plan\n\n1. Extend one installed Golden Path run to execute every adversarial clause and emit native, hash-linked receipts.\n2. Make the verifier derive those outcomes, including both Korean forms and all 22 fields, rather than trusting summary counters.\n3. Rerun and reseal a successor candidate, then record authoritative ledger adoption only after all review lanes pass.\n\n**Recommendation: remediate before promotion — Medium effort.**\n\n## Residual risks\n\nThe production implementation likely behaves correctly because focused, related, and full suites all pass. The remaining risk is evidentiary: the current verifier can certify a bundle without proving every strict same-invocation requirement, so `cbbfc12d...` cannot receive a strict PASS.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":332680,"turns":13,"tool_calls":105,"output_tokens":16895,"total_tokens":1941811,"generation_ms":325151,"tokens_per_second":52,"cost_usd":2.592742,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.943890232989759,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8703049899320282}}