{"task_id":"st_01a0163a","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T18:50:38.114Z","updated_at":"2026-08-20T14:06:45.437Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v9","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v9","description":"Provenance v9 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly candidate 78ecb799bc2e451f6055d892cb1f3af459dca62f4b8dd80c61ff8a3d43789538 in v9 bundle /home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach/.omo/evidence/task26/task26-zero-inotify-portable-installed-st_01a01574-v9, postfreeze receipts, and ledger line 158. Independently recompute candidate/product/portable-runtime/seal hashes, 251-file inventory, wheels/RECORD/import origins/source-wheel-installed parity including packaged Task26 modules and zero-inotify observer, source/installed seven-clause chains, authority 15-event heads and revocations, full test logs, frozen verifier, runtime-removed sealed-wheel rehydration and temp cleanup, pressure before/after, dirty-tree preservation, and terminal cleanup. Actually rerun bundled verifier and rehydration against final frozen state. Read-only only. Return cryptographically grounded PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as a read-only final provenance verdict - report the independently recomputed result, discrepancies, and residual risk.\n\n# PASS\n\nCandidate `78ecb799bc2e451f6055d892cb1f3af459dca62f4b8dd80c61ff8a3d43789538` is cryptographically consistent with the frozen v9 bundle, post-freeze receipts, and ledger line 158.\n\n## Recomputed identities\n\n- Candidate digest: `78ecb799bc2e451f6055d892cb1f3af459dca62f4b8dd80c61ff8a3d43789538`\n- Product digest: `991768caae108104828435be8b5887fd75bd9dabdad436930e93e3cf2782133e`\n- Portable-runtime digest: `01fde4b63230782dfa985dd8fd59f3afefae24be7913e2c1ac2d8f5c03f76813`\n- Candidate manifest SHA-256: `f3885df7210fea08692a2e52569a8825b3e39919ab5ff08f2f88d3f3f57544fd`\n- Bundle seal SHA-256: `c505c3e6af80d1b7d5a2c79c8fb353c7541bf6b374a2c8f0c74ca9ef5dc8d936`\n- Post-freeze seal SHA-256: `08ae9ea2a74927e24501d0ede6b977ed0c773938bf6b6f91bb98f028ed3029ab`\n- Bundle inventory: exactly 251 files; inventory digest `fbc7ebdca4c436fd5c2f9de8b1c3e288fb2f171553b7b4758374ac3ef3d5afc3`\n- All bundle paths remain frozen at file mode `0400` / directory mode `0500`.\n\nLedger line 158 matches all five candidate/product/runtime/bundle-seal/post-freeze-seal values.\n\n## Provenance and authority\n\n- Both wheel ZIP inventories and every RECORD hash/size recomputed successfully.\n- Hermes wheel: `d530e1dbf58f2001ea272eac44a4182ae5cf4c75b8506b103369c787e5027a7a`\n- Profile wheel: `62c508d3548ed5f5fe28c1a137bbc1b6af286d48419dc9e66fa4c7c8422b4121`\n- All 92 recorded loaded-module origins are installed `site-packages` paths.\n- Source/wheel/installed hashes agree for the five packaged modules, including `task26_*`, `gateway.commit_observer`, and `_commit_receipts`.\n- Source tree digest independently recomputed as `b34b2a12fd0ad3d4c95a58c847a2411e81272a646f5a4f5ec568d0d3640a3747`.\n- Authority chains: 15 paired events/rows, seven valid revocations, no broken predecessor or cross-chain binding.\n- Registry head: `8a1d29a109a284cab67f11efa4cb90a6e31768fb7e9b1b245b8a895ccc4ac80e`\n- Ledger head: `3dbfc6e006649725a7bb7c4006bd8a18f14ed46cff6bd39c5b9eddaca6109d30`\n- Only the requested candidate remains current.\n\n## Runtime and behavior\n\n- Bundled frozen verifier rerun: `TASK26_FROZEN_CANDIDATE_PASS`.\n- Offline sealed-wheel rehydration rerun: `TASK26_FROZEN_CANDIDATE_PASS`, with `rehydrated_runtime_verified=true`.\n- Source seven-clause rerun reproduced chain head `1b7abf3fc7799220b354c0f6b24572714cd5913b3a4868a0457bd49af395e793`.\n- Installed chain head: `4d174421d8a89ace139aa0e79dddc33c8036f64745cc91ddb8cec2fb56a390dc`.\n- Observer: `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero inotify watches, five chained receipts.\n- Recorded and currently measured pressure both equal `130964 / 131072`; candidate process count is zero.\n- Terminal cleanup has active/pending/unknown/orphan counts all zero.\n- Original runtime remains absent; temporary rehydration runtime and audit directories were removed.\n- Bundle and post-freeze aggregate hashes were unchanged by verification.\n- Dirty-tree status stayed byte-identical at `d1c88ac107f9e0b96506a03c0ea1eb934086b3cf074d60933456a0894113c3b4`.\n\n## Test evidence\n\nSealed logs support:\n\n- Gateway: 376 files, 8,308 passed, 0 failed\n- Profile: 749 passed\n- Final-state/authority/provenance: 64 source + 64 installed\n- Parser/policy/preview: 196 source + 196 installed\n- Observer: 16 source + 16 installed\n- Adversarial: 10 source + 10 installed\n- Observer-resource attacks: 4 source + 4 installed\n- Static checks, compile/help probes, and `pip check`: PASS\n\n## Discrepancies and residual risk\n\n- A bare system-Python verifier invocation fails because `checkin_cli` is not on its import path. The documented frozen invocation succeeds with the sealed build-time package source, and the genuinely portable sealed-wheel rehydration succeeds without it.\n- The Gateway runner discovered 8,365 cases but summarizes 8,308 passed and 0 failed; the 57-case delta is not explicitly classified in the log summary, although it does not contradict ledger line 158.\n- Portable canonical state excludes pip-remapped `../` script/data paths; those bytes remain wheel/RECORD-bound and were validated during fresh rehydration before portable normalization.\n- Provenance PASS does not authorize release: ledger line 158 still states `task26_complete=false` and `release_authorized=false`.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":405115,"turns":24,"tool_calls":46,"output_tokens":15931,"total_tokens":3979880,"generation_ms":381171,"tokens_per_second":42,"cost_usd":3.577547,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9956784788245462,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9373440475646887}}