{"task_id":"st_01a0174b","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-18T23:49:03.455Z","updated_at":"2026-08-20T14:43:09.012Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v10","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v10","description":"Provenance v10 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly candidate 310632f25b112373d97355c5ce3290dc55fb6d036a735e2b53861d983c4fd648 in v10 bundle, postfreeze receipts, and ledger line 159. Independently recompute candidate/product/portable-runtime/seals, 364-file inventory, wheels/RECORD/import origins, source-wheel-installed parity, 107-wheel recursive inventory/dependency closure/modes/no-symlink and before/after equality, isolated execution/origin proof, trust-boundary hash/content, source+installed seven-clause chains, 17 authority events and revocations, logs/counts, zero-inotify proof, frozen verifier, runtime-removed sealed-wheel rehydration, temp cleanup, dirty-tree preservation, terminal cleanup. Actually rerun bundled frozen verifier and rehydration from final state. Return cryptographically grounded PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk. Read-only only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only v10 provenance verdict - report the independently recomputed result, fresh execution evidence, discrepancy, and residual risk.\n\n# Verdict: FAIL\n\nCandidate `310632f25b112373d97355c5ce3290dc55fb6d036a735e2b53861d983c4fd648` is byte-consistent and operationally reproducible, but its sealed **source Golden seven-clause chain belongs to another candidate**:\n\n- Expected v10: `310632f25b112373d97355c5ce3290dc55fb6d036a735e2b53861d983c4fd648`\n- Sealed source chain: `b34b2a12fd0ad3d4c95a58c847a2411e81272a646f5a4f5ec568d0d3640a3747`\n- Source chain head: `292a39f1d1a6bf3cf466bc10ddde2f5ed145ba45f043864bb2941f866fe257f2`\n- Installed v10 chain correctly binds candidate `310632…`\n- Installed chain head: `f712a4004b4e54a8e45f63ec7783265bc6145d77a08ac2adc9a1a4e1ed652157`\n\nThe bundled frozen verifier still returns PASS because it validates only the installed chain; it does not require the source chain to bind the candidate.\n\n## Passing recomputations\n\n- Candidate manifest SHA-256: `1e7064006cfefa2df8a33abdfb54533b4cbae424f934ec889e914656e0f8b1db`\n- Bundle seal: `f9a85ba877008043adc6a4842760e2e122d2466c7a26daa50f3a2cf410fa0241`\n- Product: `86be3a61d1af08bc434416192ff22f1f30dce2408d986ed20700964ba06dc207`\n- Portable runtime: `0e63013ffb74bd9d37eb6f5f9636f196ef37929000dec17179af68bc3a81253d`\n- Post-freeze seal: `24dce55cbdba09e555f6d8a4e309e4c9541ccce2da8e487f2d8595233e2e0c73`\n- Inventory: 364 sealed files; 447 entries including directories; no writable paths or symlinks.\n- Wheels: 107 dependency wheels plus two product wheels; 109 unique projects.\n- Independently checked 11,309 ZIP members and RECORD rows: all hashes/sizes valid; zero wheel symlinks; dependency closure complete; no active direct URLs.\n- Five source/wheel/installed product modules matched byte-for-byte.\n- Wheelhouse before/after: identical, SHA-256 `9bdc1462b626d77452b7493cf327658c80578a2c48d9f4cc9ce7c12900737e19`.\n- Origin isolation and hostile-CWD shadow-import rejection passed.\n- Trust-boundary content digest: `1273abc223a8f1eb6d4adb5178d5ab466d68bbcc365b33364cf6d7ef602410c6`; receipt file SHA-256 `636d9cc2b57dd3b03557f35ea9a502ddb116dec5c948bd9685eeb1ec9e27b174`.\n- Authority: 17 chained events, 9 qualifications, 8 revocations; only v10 current.\n- Registry head: `d4e0e2f6d44d15d9ca74c47941d5504a6c1618836b455567f268c7cec8cdffe7`\n- Ledger head: `3dd46f75fa61fe632315c0a8fa5c344671124289a890884ecb8352c741154549`\n- External ledger line 159 correctly records v10; line SHA-256 `4ce742fa9346fa1a7bf823b02ba98d802b33e6494f306995c71a3ded5d3d5144`.\n- Zero-inotify proof: `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero observer/process watches.\n- Logged counts agree: 8,321 Gateway tests, 376 files, zero failures; all other stated source/installed/profile/security counts present.\n\n## Fresh final-state reruns\n\n- Frozen verifier: PASS, byte-identical output SHA-256 `1e53178ec183664118173f3433890fdab1678d2fea73794d19bfc273281f1e83`\n- Sealed-wheel rehydration: PASS, byte-identical output SHA-256 `37265d393947798ff48a7fcc9b1b543ed7f9acb18fd8ed6a503cb93eb2a64d0f`\n- Rehydration stderr empty; temporary runtime, controlled CWD, and hostile caller tree removed.\n- Bundle before/after digest unchanged: `ac8df0d1f2288b70cfe134e40a6a6094d42ed4c24d1b2bf8507e74179d16b8eb`\n- Ledger and all nine discovered Git dirty-tree states unchanged.\n- No audit temp directories or residual audit processes remain. Existing unrelated tmux sessions were untouched.\n\n## Blocker and residual risk\n\nRelease qualification is blocked until a source seven-clause chain is generated and sealed for exact candidate `310632…`, and the frozen verifier requires that source binding. Existing cryptographic integrity cannot repair the semantic cross-candidate binding.\n\nEven after repair, evidence remains limited by its declared trust boundary: no external authenticity, non-repudiation, WORM protection, or compromised operator/admin resistance is claimed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":352887,"turns":23,"tool_calls":46,"output_tokens":14550,"total_tokens":3366214,"generation_ms":325747,"tokens_per_second":45,"cost_usd":3.0874279999999996,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9971987146466504,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9353491280748906}}