{"task_id":"st_01a01779","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T00:39:50.117Z","updated_at":"2026-08-20T15:26:57.820Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v12","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v12","description":"Provenance v12 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly candidate 5948498c6297d31f9cc8adfb26b0e3e1f3c8e5ade706e36dfae2c97997499a63 in v12 bundle, postfreeze receipts, and ledger line 160. Independently recompute preexecution product binding and candidate derivation, prove evidence outputs excluded, outer manifest, candidate/product/runtime/seals, 367-file inventory, wheels/RECORD/import/source parity, 107-wheel closure, isolation/trust, source+installed candidate/tree/authority/chain parity, 21 authority events/revocations, logs/counts, observer, frozen verifier, runtime-removed rehydration, cleanup/dirty-tree. Actually rerun frozen verifier and rehydration final-state. The source chain must bind 5948498c, not b34b2a; tree digest must be provenance only. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk. Read-only only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final release-provenance verdict - I independently recomputed the bindings, reran the frozen verifier through fresh offline rehydration, and checked cleanup and ledger line 160.\n\n# Cryptographic verdict: PASS\n\nCandidate:\n\n`5948498c6297d31f9cc8adfb26b0e3e1f3c8e5ade706e36dfae2c97997499a63`\n\nKey results:\n\n- Preexecution derivation independently reproduced:\n  - `SHA256(canonical(derivation_inputs)) = 5948498c...99a63`\n  - Golden execution had not started.\n  - Evidence outputs are explicitly excluded from digest inputs.\n- Candidate and product digest both equal `5948498c...99a63`.\n- `b34b2a12...a3747` is used only as the 137-file source-provenance tree digest.\n- Source and installed seven-receipt chains each bind `candidate_digest = 5948498c...99a63`, never `b34b2a...`.\n- Outer manifest, candidate binding, candidate manifest, expected state, parity, ledger-ready receipt, and bundle seal hashes all match.\n- Inventory is exact:\n  - 365 evidence-inventory entries\n  - plus `candidate.json` and `SEAL.json`\n  - total: 367 sealed files\n  - zero writable paths, links, ownership, or mode violations.\n- Wheels:\n  - 107 dependency wheels plus two product wheels.\n  - All 109 ZIP inventories and RECORD hashes/sizes passed.\n  - Dependency closure has no missing active requirement.\n  - Fresh installed inventories: Hermes 998 entries; profile 61 entries.\n  - Profile source/wheel parity passed for all 52 packaged Python files.\n- Wheelhouse digest: `af426798...783c3`; bytes unchanged across rehydration.\n- Source/installed candidate, tree, authority, outer-manifest and chain parity passed.\n- Authority:\n  - 21 hash-chained events\n  - 11 qualifications, 10 revocations\n  - current candidate is exactly `5948498c...99a63`\n  - ledger head `53705512...a819`\n  - registry head `0071841d...b305`\n- Observer passed in both modes:\n  - `dnotify_signalfd_v1`\n  - one directory resource\n  - zero inotify watches\n  - five chained receipts.\n- Recorded test/log counts match, including 8,327 gateway tests across 376 files with zero failures.\n- Postfreeze nine-file bundle and seal passed.\n- Ledger line 160 identity and referenced hashes passed.\n\n## Actual reruns\n\nA new private venv was built offline using only the sealed wheelhouse and product wheels with `--no-index --no-deps --no-compile`.\n\nFrozen verifier result:\n\n- `TASK26_FROZEN_CANDIDATE_PASS`\n- `frozen_modes_verified=true`\n- `rehydrated_runtime_verified=true`\n- seven-clause installed chain head `0f23389a...27c98`\n- candidate/product remained `5948498c...99a63`\n\nThe temporary runtime was removed afterward. No audit temporary directories remain; sealed wheel bytes were identical before and after.\n\nA bare system-Python invocation cannot run after deliberate runtime removal because `checkin_cli` is absent. The required runtime-removed path—offline rehydration followed by the frozen verifier—passed.\n\n## Cleanup and dirty tree\n\n- Bundle writable paths: zero.\n- Original and independent runtimes remain absent.\n- Temporary audit runtime: removed.\n- Captured pre/final git status snapshots are byte-identical.\n- Live normal git status still exactly matches that captured dirty snapshot: 155 entries. The source repository is intentionally dirty, but it did not drift during qualification or this audit.\n\n## Discrepancies / blockers\n\n- None affecting candidate provenance or release identity.\n\n## Residual risk\n\nThe declared trust boundary provides no external signature, non-repudiation, WORM protection, or protection against coherent operator/administrator compromise. Within the stated trusted-host/operator/toolchain boundary, the candidate passes.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":412699,"turns":23,"tool_calls":65,"output_tokens":17480,"total_tokens":2477642,"generation_ms":383685,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":2.3374019999999995,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.995619807114376,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9473457438981661}}