{"task_id":"st_01a0179e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T01:19:35.253Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T15:15:33.320Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v13","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v13","description":"Provenance v13 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly v13 candidate 34763d9879390c1e12ba39fcdf0dec3fd9bbde39ce8b9dda51219abbc235145b in v13 bundle/postfreeze and ledger line 161. Recompute canonical derivation from full inputs; actual Hermes/profile wheel hashes and RECORDs; source/installed byte-identical deployment receipts; candidate/product/tree/wheel separation; outer/cross-mode/authority/frozen/rehydrated parity; inventory/seals; wheelhouse/origins/trust; seven-clause chains; 23 authority events; logs/counts; zero-inotify; cleanup/dirty-tree. Actually rerun frozen verifier and sealed-wheel rehydration. Candidate must not appear in wheel fields. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk. Read-only only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final release-provenance verdict for v13 candidate `34763d…5145b` - the audit is complete and the release verdict is **FAIL**.\n\n## Cryptographic verdict: FAIL\n\n### Release blocker\n\nThe candidate digest appears in **four sealed wheel-designated fields**, violating the explicit requirement that candidate identity must not appear in wheel fields:\n\n- Source `task26-evidence/05-unknown_delivery_no_retry.json` → `delivery_capability.bindings.wheel_digest`\n- Source `data/owner-actions/draft-deliveries.json` → `delivery_capability.bindings.wheel_digest`\n- Installed equivalents of both paths\n\nEach contains:\n\n`34763d9879390c1e12ba39fcdf0dec3fd9bbde39ce8b9dda51219abbc235145b`\n\nThis conflates candidate/product identity with wheel identity.\n\n### Additional discrepancies\n\n- The frozen verifier is not independently executable after cleanup:\n  - Direct `python -I independent_verify_candidate.py …` fails because `gateway` is unavailable.\n  - Adding the bundle root progresses but then fails because `checkin_cli` is unavailable.\n  - Both frozen and rehydrated modes pass only after constructing a sealed-wheel venv and explicitly bootstrapping bundle imports.\n- Rehydrated Hermes installed `RECORD` is not byte-identical to the sealed original:\n  - Sealed installed RECORD: `47be01e44dbfec32e479945db1aeb59318c97a03526f12a0e5acf9f63269cef6`\n  - Fresh rehydration RECORD: `3c8b76c236d7a462c56441b6bdf85ba5395fcee17e728935f79fef223a200774`\n  - The verifier accepts this because portable comparison excludes RECORD/path-dependent installation material.\n  - Profile installed RECORD remained `e5ca6bf3d423fccf92af88a7434cb209c46875ca4807258e1c6a5a74b3de8924`.\n\n## Checks that passed\n\n- Canonical full-input derivation recomputed exactly to candidate `34763d…5145b`.\n- Product binding recomputed to `ed1c027d…23f4c`.\n- Actual wheels:\n  - Hermes: `ebf330ee…43cbe`\n  - Profile: `62c508d3…b4121`\n- Wheel RECORD validation:\n  - Hermes: 991/991 rows, RECORD `085c3b47…5ca46`\n  - Profile: 58/58 rows, RECORD `45545433…ee95`\n  - Zero malformed or mismatched members.\n- Candidate/product are distinct from source tree and both wheel hashes; candidate equals product digest.\n- Source and installed deployment receipts and product bindings are byte-identical.\n- Source tree digest: `b34b2a12…a3747`.\n- Outer, source, installed, authority, frozen, and rehydrated candidate parity passed.\n- Authority registry and ledger: 23 correctly chained events, no hash/sequence errors; event 23 qualifies the candidate.\n- Seven-clause chains passed:\n  - Source head `aa64e982…7fe6`\n  - Installed head `dd05e582…24e2`\n- Inventory/seals passed:\n  - Bundle seal `a1d3b84e…d7d56`\n  - Postfreeze seal `b533a93a…4e943`\n  - 354 candidate inventory entries; 356 sealed files\n  - Postfreeze inventory exact\n- Wheelhouse: 107 files, digest `af426798…783c3`, frozen modes, zero symlinks.\n- Zero-inotify receipt: backend `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero inotify watches, five receipts.\n- Recorded tests include 8,336 gateway passes, zero failures across 377 files; all focused/profile/parser/authority logs agree.\n- Frozen and rehydrated verifier reruns passed inside the freshly sealed-wheel environment.\n- Audit left bundle, postfreeze receipts, and ledger line 161 byte-identical; temporary runtime was removed.\n- Dirty-tree snapshot remains byte-identical to current state: 157 entries at HEAD `0dc0f228…9f79`.\n\n## Residual risk\n\n- No signatures or external authenticity/non-repudiation are claimed.\n- The candidate was produced from a 157-entry dirty tree with `commit: none`.\n- Frozen verification depends on reconstructing package authority despite claiming original-runtime cleanup.\n- Installed Hermes RECORD reproducibility is not enforced.\n\n**Final decision: do not release v13 candidate `34763d…5145b`.**","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":341330,"turns":15,"tool_calls":35,"output_tokens":14585,"total_tokens":1907143,"generation_ms":316092,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":2.1565959999999995,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9904328693975427,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9092624902380799}}