{"task_id":"st_01a01802","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T03:09:17.287Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T15:52:06.989Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v17","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v17","description":"Provenance v17 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly v17 candidate 448252965faa5b936855225eb2a638f65e4f24291c68206fa7de587e8d65aa7f in v17 bundle/postfreeze and ledger line 162. Recompute candidate/product/wheel/tree identities; capability receipt; source/installed deployments; portable runtime v2; exact wheel RECORD and 18 relocated rows; original/rehydrated projection equality; separate raw audit hashes with no equality claim; Ty receipt/tool binding; bundle/seals; authority; chains; tests; observer; cleanup/dirty tree. Actually rerun bare stdlib bootstrap and sealed-wheel rehydration after runtime removal. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk. Read-only only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only provenance decision for v17 - I authenticated the bundle, ledger line 162, reran rehydration, and checked cleanup/drift.\n\n# CRYPTOGRAPHIC PASS\n\nPass applies **within the bundle’s declared trust boundary**. It does not itself authorize release: ledger line 162 still states `release_authorized:false`, `task26_complete:false`, and “pending multi-lane review.”\n\n## Recomputed identities\n\n- Candidate/product: `448252965faa5b936855225eb2a638f65e4f24291c68206fa7de587e8d65aa7f`\n- Product binding: `ed67bace5e141bdf371a0fb22fd761b6fc2bcad1f81b3300578dd53d4482321f`\n- Source tree, 137 bound files: `b34b2a12fd0ad3d4c95a58c847a2411e81272a646f5a4f5ec568d0d3640a3747`\n- Hermes wheel: `9189d87ec649f123e9a44ee45d7f800f6b938c8207e5f399c71e54758a023a3e`\n- Profile wheel: `62c508d3548ed5f5fe28c1a137bbc1b6af286d48419dc9e66fa4c7c8422b4121`\n- Portable runtime file/runtime identity:\n  - `3a943f91983cdec5978ad058ed0dbed77f885db0a161b7b03268e55d11408ef9`\n  - `84b48b3780d8999835f0e8f0bcee80537571506ffa497d2045e34e11a2b715f0`\n- Capability receipt recomputed in source and installed modes:\n  `f810b15aad4d0194bcb940dcd1661679249536ec8c068efbc77b595b76a36f93`\n- Source/installed deployment receipt, byte-identical:\n  `05948267ef7d5e86bf3e4f29e04c488ec736c432e793078f5d529e52922ddfb7`\n\n## Wheels and installed RECORD\n\n- Hermes: 991 members/991 RECORD rows; RECORD SHA-256  \n  `8442962a4fa5283a32abccdc8cc6cbdef47909ebbb5ef2a316ebb8288d32cecf`\n- Profile: 58 members/58 RECORD rows; RECORD SHA-256  \n  `45545433260cd10d3354999f3f4c18013886bf17419e14ea6274a4d1517aee95`\n- Every member hash, size, path, self-row, and installed row verified.\n- Exactly 18 relocated Hermes data rows verified: 16 locale YAML files plus the Linear and n8n optional-MCP manifests.\n\nPortable projections matched original and fresh rehydration:\n\n- Hermes: `4719d451dfa07436213f87f6a94cd5c7b85101dde675125d5aafd3282e7273b4`\n- Profile: `547a20d224fe90ef0282ea844c05912d1a10cb0995982ff86c3f22d088d3b958`\n\nRaw RECORD hashes were kept separate. No equality was claimed. Fresh Hermes raw RECORD was `a6f2f369...`, differing from original `3d814a14...` as expected from path-dependent launchers.\n\n## Seals, authority, chains\n\n- Bundle seal: `699ca175e7985ebd91dae2ca721280ccf424a492c0277e1c94bfef9001c6bfa7`\n- Postfreeze seal: `1eeac8f2c3f6c2f12c67c07bfbf37e74b68da245bab3a2db8fd91799cace36d0`\n- Candidate inventory: 366 entries; exact match. Total sealed files: 368.\n- Authority registry/ledger: 25 rows, canonical hashes and predecessor chains valid.\n- Current authority is exactly the v17 candidate.\n- Source evidence chain: 7 receipts, head `8f4cee6c...`\n- Installed evidence chain: 7 receipts, head `73450a61...`\n- Both observer chains: 5 valid receipts; `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero inotify watches.\n\nLedger line 162 binds exactly to all recomputed bundle, candidate, wheel, authority, runtime, test-log, and postfreeze hashes. Line SHA-256 including newline:  \n`7d138f6265af7478e94e61df8b6a597740f19d2585c084580662dc190b600ad7`.\n\n## Actual reruns\n\n- Bare stdlib bootstrap: `TASK26_FROZEN_BOOTSTRAP_PASS`\n- Fresh sealed-wheel rehydration: `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`\n- Original v17 runtime was absent before execution.\n- Hostile `PYTHONPATH` was excluded by isolated execution.\n- Fresh runtime was scrubbed afterward; no bootstrap/rehydration directories remain.\n- Focused provenance/final-state suite: **112 passed in 4.28s**\n- Sealed historical logs authenticate 8,373 gateway, 749 profile, 450 source, 450 installed, 202+202 parser, 129 related, and 25 provenance passes.\n\n## Discrepancy and residual risk\n\n- Ty capability surface rerun still passed with **zero capability diagnostics**, but outside-surface diagnostics changed from sealed `493` to `809`. The source file hash is unchanged. The historical Ty executable itself is referenced by absolute path but not cryptographically hashed; only the wrapper, source, receipt, and wheelhouse are bound. This does not invalidate the scoped capability result, but prevents claiming fully hermetic Ty reproducibility.\n- The source tree remains intentionally heavily dirty. Its status digest is unchanged before/after and exactly matches the sealed snapshots: `2800d070...`.\n- No signatures, external authenticity, non-repudiation, WORM storage, or compromised-operator resistance are claimed.\n- Ledger line 162 is not independently signed or self-hashed; its referenced artifacts authenticate, but ledger append-only status remains an operator-account trust assumption.\n\nNo bundle/source edits occurred. No writable sealed files, symlinks, temporary runtimes, or test residue remain.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":402586,"turns":21,"tool_calls":69,"output_tokens":17346,"total_tokens":3168800,"generation_ms":377827,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":4.105618000000001,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9945181636296755,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.8583009620321287}}