{"task_id":"st_01a0185e","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T04:53:39.674Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:15:19.360Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-objective-v19","task_summary":"Final objective audit for v19","description":"Objective v19 review","category":"ultrabrain","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-terra","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-terra","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"max","reasoning_effort":"xhigh"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final GOAL/CONSTRAINT audit for Task26 v19 candidate b347efcd931f8590e08faffd23ff70070d34b6fd48dcc2363cea9e91c33661ff only. Read plan, ledger lines 163 and append-only correction 164, current source, v19 bundle/postfreeze. Verify all prior blockers: canonical product/wheels/capability; hermetic Ty corrected wheel, raw diagnostics and executable provenance; external current authority at service activation, customer activation, capability issuance and actual provider transport with lock/revocation; production Telegram/CLI wiring mandatory; portable/raw RECORD; seven clauses/Korean/exactly-once/cleanup; no Task27/release. Return PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with evidence/blockers/residual risk. Read-only/no live actions.\n\n<Category_Context>\nYou are working on DEEP LOGICAL REASONING / COMPLEX ARCHITECTURE tasks.\n\n**CRITICAL - CODE STYLE REQUIREMENTS (NON-NEGOTIABLE)**:\n1. BEFORE writing ANY code, SEARCH the existing codebase to find similar patterns/styles\n2. Your code MUST match the project's existing conventions - blend in seamlessly\n3. Write READABLE code that humans can easily understand - no clever tricks\n4. If unsure about style, explore more files until you find the pattern\n\nStrategic advisor mindset:\n- Bias toward simplicity: least complex solution that fulfills requirements\n- Leverage existing code/patterns over new components\n- Prioritize developer experience and maintainability\n- One clear recommendation with effort estimate (Quick/Short/Medium/Large)\n- Signal when advanced approach warranted\n\nResponse format:\n- Bottom line (2-3 sentences)\n- Action plan (numbered steps)\n- Risks and mitigations (if relevant)\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only GO/CONSTRAINT audit for v19 - I traced each blocker through the sealed artifacts and frozen production paths.\n\n## Bottom line\n\n**FAIL** for candidate `b347efcd931f8590e08faffd23ff70070d34b6fd48dcc2363cea9e91c33661ff`. The immutable bundle is internally consistent and closes the Ty, RECORD, lifecycle, transport-revocation, and cleanup blockers, but current-authority enforcement is not mandatory at production service start or production CLI capability issuance.\n\n## Evidence\n\n- Candidate derivation recomputes exactly to `b347…61ff`; product binding recomputes to `94f9ff46…9c03`.\n- Frozen wheels hash correctly:\n  - Hermes: `62a09f9a…b3c7`\n  - Profile: `62c508d3…4121`\n  - Corrected Ty: `932d4552…e4c`\n- Ty provenance is hermetic: sealed ELF member/executable `a7c67f97…8d16`, 810 raw diagnostics at `f4a22651…e86a`, zero diagnostics in capability spans, no ambient Ty accepted.\n- Ledger line 164 correctly repairs line 163’s truncated installed-driver hash to `6aaf1367…357bb`; the receipt matches.\n- External authority is enforced for:\n  - customer activation through `dualcoach_admin` and `activate_customer_cutover`;\n  - internal `NutritionCoachingCoordinator.issue_delivery_capability`;\n  - Telegram provider I/O through `authorize_delivery_provider_transport`, with shared authority lock and zero sender calls after revocation.\n- Portable RECORD projections match across rehydration; differing raw installer RECORD hashes are explicitly retained and equality is not claimed.\n- Seven hash-linked clauses prove all 22 Korean answers, deterministic clarification/revision, preview isolation, projection failure, unknown-outcome no-retry, one `sent_audited` delivery, duplicate rejection, and resumed terminal cleanup.\n- Bundle/postfreeze seals match `0bef0efe…2599` and `9e7da340…6f84`.\n- Ledger ends at line 164 with `task26_complete:false`, `task27_started:false`, and `release_authorized:false`.\n\n## Blocking findings\n\n1. **Production capability issuance bypasses current authority.**  \n   The packaged `dualcoach_tasks21_25_controller issue-delivery-capability` directly rewrites `draft-deliveries.json`. Its issuance block contains no `FileCandidateAuthoritySource`, `authorize(..., \"capability_issue\")`, or revocation check. It also omits `runtime_authority_snapshot`, `hermes_wheel_sha256`, `profile_wheel_sha256`, and `candidate_product_binding_sha256`. The Golden Path instead calls the protected coordinator method directly, so its PASS does not prove the mandatory production CLI path.\n\n2. **Service-start authority is controller-conventional, not runtime-mandatory.**  \n   `launch_controller(..., start_service=True)` checks authority while starting the dedicated service, but normal packaged service entrypoints contain no Task26 enforcement, and `TelegramAdapter.connect()` does not load current authority. It only becomes mandatory when `_get_nutrition_coaching()` is later invoked. Therefore service activation can occur outside the authority-checked controller path.\n\n## Action plan\n\n1. Route CLI capability issuance through the coordinator’s lock-held `capability_issue` authorization and require all canonical product/wheel/snapshot bindings.\n2. Enforce current external authority inside service startup, not only in the optional launch controller.\n3. Add revoke-before-issue and direct-service-start negatives, reseal a new candidate, and rerun all Task26 lanes. **Effort: Medium.**\n4. Keep Task27 and release blocked.\n\n## Residual risks\n\n- 810 Ty diagnostics remain outside the scoped capability spans; no whole-file-clean claim is made.\n- Current worktree status has drifted since freeze, although the six relevant production modules remain byte-identical to the sealed Hermes wheel.\n- Evidence remains unsigned and bounded by the declared operator/admin trust model.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":361577,"turns":22,"tool_calls":101,"output_tokens":17187,"total_tokens":4505944,"generation_ms":349133,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":4.904716,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.994668522660468,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9313224128639621}}