{"task_id":"st_01a01862","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T04:53:40.247Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:15:19.341Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v19","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v19","description":"Provenance v19 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly v19 candidate b347efcd931f8590e08faffd23ff70070d34b6fd48dcc2363cea9e91c33661ff in v19 bundle/postfreeze and ledger lines 163+164. Recompute candidate/wheels/product/capability, corrected Ty wheel/member/RECORD/executable/raw diagnostics/receipt, source+installed runtime authority snapshots and production wiring evidence, portable/raw RECORD, seals, authority, tests, observer, cleanup/dirty tree. Actually rerun hermetic Ty, bare bootstrap, sealed-wheel rehydration. Confirm append-only correction supplies installed-driver hash. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE with discrepancies/blockers/residual risk. Read-only only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only v19 provenance verdict - the exact sealed candidate passes, with two non-blocking operational discrepancies.\n\n# Cryptographic verdict: PASS\n\nCandidate:\n\n`b347efcd931f8590e08faffd23ff70070d34b6fd48dcc2363cea9e91c33661ff`\n\n## Verified\n\n- Candidate derivation recomputes exactly from canonical pre-execution inputs.\n- Product digest equals candidate digest.\n- Wheels:\n  - Hermes: `62a09f9a...ab2b3c7`\n  - Profile: `62c508d3...22b4121`\n  - Corrected Ty: `932d4552...48bfe4c`\n- All 109 wheel RECORD inventories, hashes, and sizes validate.\n- Capability identity matches source and installed modes.\n- Candidate inventory: 375 evidence files; bundle seal covers 377 total files.\n- Bundle seal: `0bef0efe...3992599`\n- Postfreeze seal: `9e7da340...8c6f84`\n- Source and installed runtime-authority snapshots are identical:\n  - snapshot `2877f7b0...690aa7`\n  - candidate bound\n  - 3 events\n  - registry head `37017156...61023`\n  - ledger head `4049d9e6...56e7b`\n- Production wiring is present in wheel bytes:\n  - external credential-backed authority\n  - forbidden bundle/profile roots\n  - activation, capability-issue, and provider-transport revalidation\n  - predecessor snapshot and revocation checks\n- Portable RECORD projections match across rehydration; raw RECORD equality is correctly not claimed because launcher material is path-dependent.\n- Observer: `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, zero inotify watches, five receipts.\n- Recorded tests are internally consistent:\n  - focused 207\n  - expanded 529 source + 529 installed\n  - parser 204 + 204\n  - related 129\n  - profile 749\n  - gateway 8,406 passed, 0 failed across 381 files/12 workers\n  - Ruff checks passed\n\n## Fresh reruns\n\n- Hermetic Ty: PASS\n  - executable/member: `a7c67f97...f88d16`\n  - installed RECORD: `2bf2008b...895be`\n  - raw diagnostics: `f4a22651...ce86a`\n  - 810 diagnostics, zero on capability surface\n  - receipt: `97f22cb8...83bb`\n- Bare bootstrap: `TASK26_FROZEN_BOOTSTRAP_PASS`\n- Sealed-wheel rehydration: `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`\n- Rehydration removed its runtime completely.\n- Bundle/postfreeze remain immutable: zero writable paths, zero symlinks.\n- Audit temporary files were removed.\n\n## Ledger correction\n\nLine 164 is a valid append-only correction to line 163. It supplies the complete installed-driver hash:\n\n`6aaf136745afbe39fa4e2fcfa0a1c0b7f4e5c111a336b192f34d24f392b357bb`\n\nThis exactly matches `receipts/installed-driver.json`. Line 163’s superseded value was truncated.\n\n## Discrepancies and residual risk\n\n- The live Hermes dirty tree has drifted since sealing:\n  - sealed status hash: `121b6303...6a90c`\n  - current status hash: `3f30c203...f529d4`\n  - Therefore PASS applies only to the immutable v19 bundle, not the current worktree.\n- Running `independent_verify_candidate.py` directly without a rehydrated runtime fails because its recorded original installed runtime was intentionally removed. The self-contained bare bootstrap and sealed-wheel rehydration both pass, so this is a verifier-entrypoint portability limitation rather than a byte-integrity failure.\n- Trust is hash-based and unsigned; external authenticity and operator/admin compromise remain outside the sealed trust boundary.\n- Candidate remains pending multi-lane review and is not release authorization.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":335650,"turns":21,"tool_calls":59,"output_tokens":14725,"total_tokens":2657330,"generation_ms":305651,"tokens_per_second":48,"cost_usd":2.570231,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9873561049254577,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.932122659269925}}