{"task_id":"st_01a01885","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T05:32:44.849Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:29:07.278Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v20","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v20","description":"Provenance v20 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly v20 candidate 0c2d83b143aa0175e01916ce8c85149b415187aed5a13bbebe60c8ea060decd1, v20 bundle/postfreeze and ledger line165. Recompute candidate/product/wheels/controller/Telegram tool hashes, capability-v2 source+installed lifecycle, runtime snapshots, hermetic Ty/raw diagnostics, portable/raw RECORD, seals, authority, tests, cleanup. Rerun hermetic Ty, bare bootstrap, sealed-wheel rehydration. Confirm v19 revoked and v20 only current; no copied/truncated ledger hashes. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE and residual risks. Read-only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only v20 provenance verdict - the exact candidate passes cryptographic and runtime verification, with bounded residual risks.\n\n## Verdict: **PASS**\n\nCandidate:\n\n`0c2d83b143aa0175e01916ce8c85149b415187aed5a13bbebe60c8ea060decd1`\n\n### Cryptographic results\n\n- Candidate manifest: `100012f199ff9c71f405afee20583e5d351c9bd878ea7ba53516d64c00a91dce`\n- Product derivation recomputed to the exact candidate digest.\n- Hermes wheel: `e8e3ee5c26fa2645d8b06cfac5d354d4b3722f15ecb44701bce410a5202e55e7`\n- Profile wheel: `62c508d3548ed5f5fe28c1a137bbc1b6af286d48419dc9e66fa4c7c8422b4121`\n- Corrected Ty wheel: `932d4552233cfbaa325ddc3db5982150a37f437cf94a332eb3869052148bfe4c`\n- Controller source: `0f7dacb7184035630f9313da73d72a68416dff4e1d8c3f476886c7ae789bd26a`\n- Telegram source: `81c18c144643868e4e38e6689f379d1e31bc94ef37a8aa57dfc4ba84e2415db5`\n- Bundle seal: `2437d3ec821ad95780074c3e2365bfccf9a7415817adb96c9bb9c153a90c2679`\n- Postfreeze seal: `95ddac25805ae32b92e4a32efd65767afae4c679d2057ffb76bd0ac5dee588be`\n\nAll 381 candidate inventory entries matched current bytes. Bundle remained frozen: zero writable paths and zero symlinks.\n\n### Lifecycle and authority\n\n- Source lifecycle hash: `c6f92bb650b8f62e3a3c54fd249fa1eb7335a7c069d263421bfbe9196b18e990`\n- Installed lifecycle hash: `40eb40d51b6cc7650b0cdabd03a40f58921b316ca1a1eb10e19986fde14c35bd`\n- Both prove protected controller capability-v2 issuance, active authority, and audited delivery.\n- Runtime snapshot self-hash and source/installed parity passed:\n  `70ed568fdbd4113d2dda1971b3509cce4c7706468520099a0b62feea142eb18c`\n- Independently recomputed all 29 paired authority-chain links.\n- v19 `b347efcd...c33661ff` is revoked.\n- v20 is the sole current qualified candidate and is not revoked.\n\n### Ty, RECORD, and runtime\n\n- Fresh hermetic Ty rerun passed:\n  - raw diagnostics: `f4a2265141525dc8005430e8afdf61145ff88c24a7fc00aad2d7609b3f2ce86a`\n  - 810 diagnostics total\n  - 0 capability-surface diagnostics\n  - 810 acknowledged outside-surface diagnostics\n- Raw wheel RECORD validation passed for all Hermes 992, profile 58, and Ty 11 members.\n- Portable projections recomputed:\n  - Hermes: `6fcb7a82f2a09c0af26255f785e20d229650a99af272d98850ab9d5b2c2bb410`\n  - Profile: `89f7425c2712a4e4916fc59d8a7e5492e4fd055961b041a0e49310203539197e`\n- Fresh bare bootstrap and full sealed-wheel rehydration passed with `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`.\n- Terminal cleanup passed: no active, pending, orphaned, unknown, or temporary runtime residue.\n\n### Ledger line 165\n\n- All 52 digest-valued fields are complete 64-character lowercase SHA-256 values.\n- Every `evidence.*_sha256` resolves to actual v20 or postfreeze bytes.\n- No copied or truncated hashes were found.\n- Unlike v19 line 163, no correction record is required.\n\nHash-bound test receipts confirm: focused 450, expanded source/installed 579 each, parser 204 each, related 129, profile 749, and gateway 8,416 passed with zero failures.\n\n## Residual risks\n\n- Seals are self-hashes, not externally signed attestations. Compromised operator/admin or coherent repository-and-verifier replacement remains outside the declared trust boundary.\n- Ty does not establish whole-file cleanliness; 810 pre-existing outside-surface diagnostics remain.\n- Raw installed RECORD hashes are intentionally nonportable and changed on fresh rehydration; portable projections matched exactly.\n- The archived rehydration JSON contains stale absolute paths, so direct replay through `independent_verify_candidate.py` fails. Fresh sealed bootstrap/rehydration through the authoritative `task26_final_state` path passed.\n- Historical full-suite tests were hash-audited rather than all rerun; the explicitly requested Ty, bootstrap, and sealed rehydration gates were rerun live.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":305564,"turns":17,"tool_calls":55,"output_tokens":14051,"total_tokens":1610865,"generation_ms":285239,"tokens_per_second":49,"cost_usd":1.8299839999999998,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9825625473843821,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.9151021972502746}}