{"task_id":"st_01a018ab","status":"completed","residency_state":"evicted","parent_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","root_session_id":"01a00387-aaf8-7f2f-89e3-e24c1af24859","depth":1,"execution_mode":"in-process","model":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","notify_on_terminal":true,"created_at":"2026-08-19T06:13:44.553Z","updated_at":"2026-08-21T16:29:07.821Z","notification":{"run_epoch":0,"notified_epoch":0},"name":"review-provenance-v21","task_summary":"Final provenance audit for v21","description":"Provenance v21 review","category":"deep","requested_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"openai-codex/gpt-5.6-sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"fallback_models":[{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},{"provider":"clinepass","model_id":"cline-pass/glm-5.2","display":"clinepass/cline-pass/glm-5.2","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"}],"resolved_model":{"provider":"openai-codex","model_id":"gpt-5.6-sol","display":"GPT-5.6 Sol","source":"category","variant":"medium","reasoning_effort":"medium"},"spawn_spec":{"version":1,"cwd":"/home/cube/projects/richard/traning coach","prompt":"Final RELEASE PROVENANCE audit for exactly v21 candidate c5c24ee689daaa7a3fc52f85781ab3bc274490a9429ced3d09d35fcf1a4f24d5, v21 bundle/postfreeze and ledger line166. Recompute candidate/product/wheels/commit_observer/runtime_authority/Telegram/controller/Golden/verifier hashes, watcher/privacy lifecycle, runtime snapshots, hermetic Ty/raw diagnostics, portable/raw RECORD, seals, authority, tests, cleanup. Fresh rerun hermetic Ty, bare bootstrap, sealed-wheel rehydration. Confirm v20 revoked/v21 sole current and all ledger digests resolve. Return cryptographic PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE. Read-only.\n\n<Category_Context name=\"deep\">\nYou are operating in DEEP mode. This is the category reserved for goal-oriented autonomous work on hairy problems that reward thorough exploration and comprehensive solutions.\n\nThe orchestrator chose this category because the task benefits from depth over speed. You should feel empowered to spend the time needed: five to fifteen minutes of silent exploration before the first edit is normal and correct. Rushing to implementation on a deep task is a failure mode, not a feature.\n\n# How deep mode adjusts the base behavior\n\n**Exploration budget: generous.** Read the files you need, trace dependencies both directions, fire 2-5 explore/librarian sub-agents in parallel for broader questions. Build a complete mental model before the first `apply_patch`. Exploration here is an investment, not overhead.\n\n**Goal, not plan.** You receive a GOAL describing the desired outcome. You figure out HOW to achieve it. The orchestrator deliberately did not hand you a step-by-step plan; producing one and asking for approval is not what was asked. Execute.\n\n**Atomic task treatment.** When the goal contains numbered steps or phases, treat them as sub-steps of ONE task and execute them all in this turn. Splitting them across turns is wrong unless they reveal an architectural blocker that requires the user's input. If the \"steps\" turn out to be genuinely independent tasks that should have been separate delegations, flag that in your final message and refuse the ones beyond scope.\n\n**Root cause bias.** Prefer root-cause fixes over symptom fixes. A null check around `foo()` is a symptom fix; fixing whatever causes `foo()` to return unexpected values is the root fix. Trace at least two levels up before settling on an answer. In deep mode, you have permission (and the expectation) to do the deeper fix.\n\n**Ambition scaled to context.** For brand-new greenfield work, be ambitious. Choose strong defaults, avoid AI-slop aesthetics, produce something you would be proud to hand to another senior engineer. For changes in an existing codebase, be surgical and respect the existing patterns; depth does not mean invasiveness.\n\n**Completion bar: full delivery.** \"Simplified version\", \"proof of concept\", and \"you can extend this later\" are not acceptable deliveries for a deep task. The orchestrator routed here specifically for a complete solution. If you hit a genuine blocker (missing secret, design decision only the user can make, three materially different attempts all failed), document it and return; otherwise, finish the task.\n\n**Status cadence: sparse.** The user is not on the other side of this conversation; the orchestrator is, and they will synthesize your progress. Send commentary only at meaningful phase transitions (starting exploration, starting implementation, starting verification, hitting a genuine blocker). Do not narrate every tool call; silence during focused work is expected.\n</Category_Context>"},"host_pid":1761519,"final_response":"I read this as the final read-only provenance verdict for v21 - report the independently recomputed identities, fresh execution results, and any verifier caveat.\n\n# Cryptographic verdict: PASS\n\nCandidate `c5c24ee689daaa7a3fc52f85781ab3bc274490a9429ced3d09d35fcf1a4f24d5` is internally consistent, sealed, reproducible, and the sole current qualified candidate.\n\n## Recomputed identities\n\n- Candidate manifest: `81c7e0b59ea316506e801019b695d7b2125bf07ce0fc6d35fc4e37ec26ca7bc1`\n- Candidate derivation recomputed from canonical inputs: exact candidate digest\n- Product-binding file: `947d93c80d1d9c9df77c3f4cc51f73ac9673d001765873cdada182b8eafb4c74`\n- Product-binding identity: `c9d33ec70c9f55ab9f8e530a9c160adf98e933ae1cf794a75d8b9c8bba75404f`\n- Hermes wheel: `d718d3a8779cf37e2ff576d1fd9cdd1642e0d0528a954a6ccfd35f88b30d34db`\n- Profile wheel: `62c508d3548ed5f5fe28c1a137bbc1b6af286d48419dc9e66fa4c7c8422b4121`\n- Commit observer: `a0dfca77dadc4cfc80946f27ebe344f22559410edaa7fb843a779796701826cc`\n- Runtime authority: `9c87a226475e71e7c6727fdab01410156cd77b8e8609328c15eccda7a933bd43`\n- Telegram: `5e08e9a5392dadf91344de35d21564d23344c6c3fda80aa3f5c10d5f0f213ebe`\n- Controller: `0f7dacb7184035630f9313da73d72a68416dff4e1d8c3f476886c7ae789bd26a`\n- Source Golden: `3f8595e5df10f57d6abcc24b92c64dab7155433c08b94547093fa01f95773462`\n- Golden verifier: `33eb4c7f1417d933d1abf2fc622f190ae58c69dae7d433009c40c8f018cfaeb3`\n\nBoth production wheel ZIP inventories and every RECORD hash/size/self-row passed direct recomputation.\n\n## Seals and ledger\n\n- Bundle seal: `febfac9ddf639c7c993f87373643228337e190f68af4ccc6b094aba4e744baaf`\n- Expected state: `05202cc53831fff64d05e5f6b787bf8cc168aeccc8c0821eee93c5f3e5528c35`\n- Post-freeze seal: `5b1b3465a0e33fcda6f27f39b70d361776905eaad436bd401584913e894a11e9`\n- Bundle inventory: exact, 378 entries\n- Post-freeze inventory: exact, 6 entries\n- All canonical `document_sha256` values passed.\n- All 31 registry events and 31 qualification-ledger rows recomputed without mismatch.\n- Every `_sha256` evidence digest in ledger line 166 resolves to an actual v21 bundle or post-freeze file.\n- Line 166’s candidate, bundle seal, and post-freeze seal match exactly.\n\nAuthority replay produced:\n\n- Sole live candidate: v21\n- v20 `0c2d83...decd1`: revoked\n- Registry head: `7966be517c26b46b8fa555a6ee546aef297a26f9c9600cf7dc5b0ac56fa8054b`\n- Ledger head: `290b0b1ae682c21fd097db5a07a5b5e4b75e0dd072e1a5a938b4746b4afd2f51`\n\n## Fresh execution\n\n- Hermetic Ty: reproduced exact raw diagnostics:\n  - Raw SHA-256: `f4a2265141525dc8005430e8afdf61145ff88c24a7fc00aad2d7609b3f2ce86a`\n  - 810 raw/outside-surface diagnostics\n  - 0 capability diagnostics\n  - Outside fingerprint: `4b24118c95c05fa392f976a69034da7e7d24f63d098b32ef5c252537ab13da61`\n  - Receipt identity: `d63f16490b84d39924fc6a532ccb9aed297b5600755f51cb40866db22470b47d`\n- Bare isolated bootstrap: `TASK26_FROZEN_BOOTSTRAP_PASS`\n- Fresh sealed-wheel rehydration: `ACTUAL_INSTALLED_GOLDEN_PATH_PASS`\n- Runtime snapshot reproduced: `4aa770a1939609642bcaf2e559313c98d8e539d2a40905af0cad5e9a1b66d83e`\n- Portable RECORD projections reproduced:\n  - Hermes: `7c52fe1750b7bcc159d4ade26b0fe5414b8baba24107248047ecb6dc95ebaf4d`\n  - Profile: `a9b6e67929efc911bfdf1c18d63b6e22788a1cb91d920eedb8e8f96c7120ac94`\n- Raw installed RECORD equality is correctly **not claimed** because installer-generated paths are nonportable.\n\n## Watcher, privacy, tests, cleanup\n\nSource and installed Golden evidence agree:\n\n- `dnotify_signalfd_v1`, one directory resource, one signal fd, zero inotify\n- Live revocation disconnect: PASS\n- Watcher cleanup: PASS\n- Advisory `store=False`: PASS\n- Duplicate rejected: true\n- Terminal cleanup: active/orphan/pending/unknown counts all zero\n\nSealed test evidence resolves and reports:\n\n- Focused 460\n- Expanded source/installed 591 each\n- Parser source/installed 204 each\n- Related 131\n- Profile 749\n- Full Gateway: 382 files, 8,428 passed, 0 failed\n\nFresh rehydration removed its runtime completely; no audit temporary directories remain. The original runtime remains absent. Candidate and seal hashes were unchanged after execution.\n\nThe standalone independent verifier dereferences the deliberately removed original runtime and therefore cannot operate directly on the cleaned bundle. This is not a provenance failure: the sealed bootstrap and rehydration path reconstructs the bound runtime from the verified wheels and completed successfully. No repository files were changed.","run_stats":{"runtime_ms":280676,"turns":15,"tool_calls":52,"output_tokens":11796,"total_tokens":1601641,"generation_ms":255738,"tokens_per_second":46,"cost_usd":1.891073,"cache_hit_rate_last":0.9891921877689998,"cache_hit_rate_run":0.896248376414053}}